Paula Radcliffe: A super injunction stops the British press from reporting her blood values?

Super injunctions don't apply to the United States ya goofball.

I assumed he was going to check on Google.co.uk

The only reference I have seen Paula's superinjunction referenced is this board.

Could anyone post a link proving it's existence?

No results in Netherlands..

This thread is showing up in UK results, both searching with the full title, or just relevant keywords from it.

ella guru wrote:

This thread is showing up in UK results, both searching with the full title, or just relevant keywords from it.

Not for long.

Linford Christie for as long as it lasts:

https://twitter.com/ChristieLinford/status/628129944527327232

Super injunction !!!!! Bet someone didn't sleep well last night ...

Interesting.

Direct quotes from this thread are now indexed by Google and refer to this thread, as googling this:

Super injunctions don't apply to the United States ya goofball.

brings you here.

In contrast, direct quotes from the other thread are not indexed by Google:

Googling this:

"she has gotten a super injunction against the British press reporting on it, so she certainly can't comment on it." letsrun

Gives you no results in quotes, and won't bring you to the thread.

Yup, thread title is already indexed by Google. I have to admit, I was completely wrong on this :(

@CuriousPerson

That is indeed interesting. Perhaps I should wait a while before admitting defeat?

Dirty Paula wrote:

Yup, thread title is already indexed by Google. I have to admit, I was completely wrong on this :(

Completely is a stretch; Google also indexed the content, as it normally does. (I have yet to find something where the content is not indexed with the title). This means someone took the other thread off the Google index. (That's how it normally works for pirating too; Google simply takes stuff off the index).

It does mean that Google isn't simply not indexing anything with the words 'Radcliffe super injunction', though.

Can anyone get the Linford Christie tweet to show up? I read it yesterday but when I click on the link today it won't open.

Dirty Paula wrote:

@CuriousPerson

That is indeed interesting. Perhaps I should wait a while before admitting defeat?

There are some conclusions we can draw from your failed experiment. One being that references to "Radcliffe super injunction" are not being suppressed ergo the assertion that there is a super injunction In place is probably false. We are the only ones talking about it.

Try it for Kelly Holmes and Christine Ohuruogu

Bozo detector wrote:

There are some conclusions we can draw from your failed experiment. One being that references to "Radcliffe super injunction" are not being suppressed

But then why does the content of the other thread, that also references the injunction, not show up on Google? As I thought (and someone called me an idiot for it) Google does indeed index letsrun.com threads and their contents within minutes - with the exception of the "Paula Radliffe's silence is deafening" thread.

CuriousPerson thinks this is, because the content of the other thread was explicitly taken off the Google index.

I'll wait and see. If this thread is gone frome the Google search results this time tomorrow, that's proof enough for me. If it is still there, I will admit I was wrong

BTW: if you search twitter, you get a current result for Radliffe super injunction, but if you tell Google to search twitter for the same keywords: no results.

You're amazingly stupid.

That's a clown query, bro. You misspelled her name. When spelled correctly it pops up at Google.co.uk.

Only this thread, but not the other one - explain why

Make sure you're spelling is correct

paula radcliffe's silence is deafening

The other thread appears in my result set.