Did Mike Rossi (viral marathon dad) cheat his way into Boston?

abingtonrunner wrote:

This is not Iran, Iraq or South Korea.

they said of note was that there was NO conclusive evidence that his time was inaccurate. They did not say they had conclusive evidence that it was accurate or that he was on the course. That is a big difference.

And you're an idiot, it's up to the prosecution to prove, you find the evidence, ever heard of the right to remain silent, until you find "conclusive evidence" he's presumed innocent.

And WFT does South Korea have to do with it?

Rossi Rossi Rossi wrote:

Bearer of bad news wrote:

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news (OK, I'm not really) but Mike really does own you lot, especially the two numbskulls Bloviator and bored troller, it's been fun to watch, but can't you two see what he's doing, what does both of your handles have in common?, think about it.

I don't get it. I guess that Mike Rossi is just too savvy for me.

Most people including Mike are too savvy for you and the other idiots on this thread.

Where did you get "hundreds" from? Where did you read he cooperated? Obviously you are either him or friends with him based on comments a few posts ago, so why don't you offer up exactly what he shared. He has neither been open nor honest. There is no record of that in the public domain. I think you are very confused how the US court system works, which does have an open system and what occurred here. I, as anyone else who would be accused in this manner,would most certainly share the exculpatory evidence he so loudly professes that he has. If he isn't going to share it, he shouldn't have posted and boasted that he has it. That speaks volumes about him and his guilt. He opened pandora's box by saying he has evidence but like a third grader, said I am not sharing,,,,,nah nah nah.

Case closed.

And remember, this is a guy that shares everything! He filmed his whole Boston run.

abingtonrunner wrote:

share the exculpatory evidence he so loudly professes that he has. If he isn't going to share it, he shouldn't have posted and boasted that he has it. That speaks volumes about him and his guilt. He opened pandora's box by saying he has evidence but like a third grader, said I am not sharing,,,,,nah nah nah.

Case closed.

What don't you understand?, as indicated above he doesn't have to share or say anything, if he wants to post and boast he has it, he can, it's a free country, it's not "Iran or Iraq", it's his prerogative and it says nothing about his guilt, it may do in "Iran or Iraq" or your tiny hypocritical mind but not here or in a court of the good ol' USofA. You're the one carrying on like a "third grader". Fool.

abingtonrunner wrote:

I think you are very confused how the US court system works,

this was funny coming from ar pissed meself laughing kangaroo court is hes style

Innocent unless proved guilty wrote:

abingtonrunner wrote:

share the exculpatory evidence he so loudly professes that he has. If he isn't going to share it, he shouldn't have posted and boasted that he has it. That speaks volumes about him and his guilt. He opened pandora's box by saying he has evidence but like a third grader, said I am not sharing,,,,,nah nah nah.

Case closed.

What don't you understand?, as indicated above he doesn't have to share or say anything, if he wants to post and boast he has it, he can, it's a free country, it's not "Iran or Iraq", it's his prerogative and it says nothing about his guilt, it may do in "Iran or Iraq" or your tiny hypocritical mind but not here or in a court of the good ol' USofA. You're the one carrying on like a "third grader". Fool.

You are right, he doesn't have to share. But if he is going claim he has photos, although everyone, including the LVM, knows that he does not have anything but lies, then it is our prerogative to say that he lied and cheated. Moreover, it is a reflection on his honesty and more aptly, his guilt. It is disingenuous to say you have something over and over only to not show it. He lied about what he has and where he got it. I have the email from him and US Candids.

I realize that you are drunk on Mike's Kool-Aid, but to each his own. The truth hurts, so deal with it. I am sure that before the next LVM that there will be some pretty definitive action which will paint an entirely different picture.

abingtonrunner wrote:

Case closed.

Oh goody does that mean this thread can be closed then and Mike continue to walk and run around as the innocent man he is.

Until he arrested.

Innocent unless proved guilty wrote:

.

That's just it .... several people collected evidence and we have reviewed the evidence and all rationale people concluded that he is guilty.

He was considered innocent until it was proven he was guilty. Understand?

Bloviator wrote:

Until he arrested.

Go away fake.

Preponderance of evidence wrote:

Innocent unless proved guilty wrote:

.

That's just it .... several people collected evidence and we have reviewed the evidence and all rationale people concluded that he is guilty.

He was considered innocent until it was proven he was guilty. Understand?

No, because the meatheads on this thread are not "rationale people" so what ever they concluded counts for zilch, the RD and USATF seem to agree, sorry to burst your bubble.

Hi cheat defender! Hi minion of Mike! Hi low IQ!

Innocent unless proved guilty wrote:

Preponderance of evidence wrote:

That's just it .... several people collected evidence and we have reviewed the evidence and all rationale people concluded that he is guilty.

He was considered innocent until it was proven he was guilty. Understand?

No, because the meatheads on this thread are not "rationale people" so what ever they concluded counts for zilch, the RD and USATF seem to agree, sorry to burst your bubble.

Innocent unless proved guilty wrote:

Preponderance of evidence wrote:

That's just it .... several people collected evidence and we have reviewed the evidence and all rationale people concluded that he is guilty.

He was considered innocent until it was proven he was guilty. Understand?

No, because the meatheads on this thread are not "rationale people" so what ever they concluded counts for zilch, the RD and USATF seem to agree, sorry to burst your bubble.

so if he people on this thread are meatheads and what they conclude doesn't count and he wasn't proved guilty by the authoritative powers does that mean he innocent? if so can we close the thread?

"Hi cheat defender! Hi minion of Mike! Hi low IQ!" - As I said, "meatheads".

BarbiePlaysRD wrote:

Hi cheat defender! Hi minion of Mike! Hi low IQ!

Innocent unless proved guilty wrote:

No, because the meatheads on this thread are not "rationale people" so what ever they concluded counts for zilch, the RD and USATF seem to agree, sorry to burst your bubble.

close the thread? wrote:

Innocent unless proved guilty wrote:

No, because the meatheads on this thread are not "rationale people" so what ever they concluded counts for zilch, the RD and USATF seem to agree, sorry to burst your bubble.

so if he people on this thread are meatheads and what they conclude doesn't count and he wasn't proved guilty by the authoritative powers does that mean he innocent? if so can we close the thread?

The problem is, just because you are found not guilty (which was not the case in this instance), does not mean you are innocent. A not guilty verdict in a court case does not necessarily or automatically mean you are innocent. That is a fact, not an opinion.

Innocent unless proved guilty wrote:

"Hi cheat defender! Hi minion of Mike! Hi low IQ!" - As I said, "meatheads".

haha is that whats meant by shooting yourself in the foot

abingtonrunner wrote:

close the thread? wrote:

so if he people on this thread are meatheads and what they conclude doesn't count and he wasn't proved guilty by the authoritative powers does that mean he innocent? if so can we close the thread?

The problem is, just because you are found not guilty (which was not the case in this instance), does not mean you are innocent. A not guilty verdict in a court case does not necessarily or automatically mean you are innocent. That is a fact, not an opinion.

FMD you're clutching at straws now.

I think everyone on here knows that all these people now proclaiming his innocence are actually Mike and his DJ minions. You tried to intimidate people away and it didn't work. You tried to make it about me and it didn't work.

Now the only hope they have is to calm the fervor so that new readers just get bored and decide not to poke around too much when they find it in Google search results.

It's not going to work. Every single one of us has bookmarked this thread and know to to get back to it.