What the hell?
The Huff Post wrote:
The New York Times editorial board endorsed Sens. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) and Amy Klobuchar (Minn.) in the race for the Democratic presidential primary after interviewing the top nine contenders on issues that are most important to voters in this heated election year.
It was a perplexing endorsement, since the two senators are running on significantly divergent platforms. Warren is one of the most progressive candidates in the race, while Klobuchar is a moderate.
So basically they were afraid to upset their really liberal readers as well as their more more moderate readers so they endorsed two candidates to try to make everyone happy? Is that how everyone else reads this?
https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/new-york-times-endorses-warren-klobuchar-041128419.html