No surprise. the losers and haters are out in full force. Let's just appreciate them for the variety they bring to the boards. God knows they can't help themselves.
It's not your fault...
It's not your fault..
It's not your fault.
No surprise. the losers and haters are out in full force. Let's just appreciate them for the variety they bring to the boards. God knows they can't help themselves.
It's not your fault...
It's not your fault..
It's not your fault.
Dwightarm wrote:
Soccer mom 6 wrote:
What’s with you pedophiles fixating on HS girls?
Never seen such a bunch of degenerate stalkers. Beat it creeps.
No one here is sexualizing her nor commenting on anything about her appearance other than her foot pronation.
This is a running site. We discuss all things running, that includes HS boys and HS girls. There is nothing sexual about that as most of us also competed in HS.
If you feel any of these posts are sexualizing an underage girl or boy, by all means, use the Report Post feature. Otherwise, this is no different than sports fans commenting on any other HS sport.
Learn what pronation is. She doesn't pronate.
Sigh! wrote:
Learn what pronation is. She doesn't pronate.
U serious man? Everyone pronates. Its part of landing on ur feet. U cant run or walk if u dont pronate.
crumpet wrote:
Soccer mom 6 wrote:
What’s with you pedophiles fixating on HS girls?
Never seen such a bunch of degenerate stalkers. Beat it creeps.
I'm with you.
The interest in high school girl performances is more than creepy.
So I shouldn't go watch our high school girls basketball team who is 9-0, but I can go watch our boys team who is 4-5?
Why is she racing so soon after xc?
After xc, she should have taken a 2 week break.
55 year old guy....... wrote:
crumpet wrote:
I'm with you.
The interest in high school girl performances is more than creepy.
So I shouldn't go watch our high school girls basketball team who is 9-0, but I can go watch our boys team who is 4-5?
You’re male. You’re evil
They're just jealous
She's getting a lot of attention
Setting records making history
And she's got charisma
Dummies got to think of some way to put down someone who's working hard and accomplishing and getting the recognition they deserve
crumpet wrote:
Soccer mom 6 wrote:
What’s with you pedophiles fixating on HS girls?
Never seen such a bunch of degenerate stalkers. Beat it creeps.
I'm with you.
The interest in high school girl performances is more than creepy.
That's cuz you're an idiot who lives in Fantasyland
Here in the real world we're naturally attracted to cool people who are making history
And she's doing it with style and hard work and deserves the attention
Why don't you try doing something with your life instead of being a jealous troll
Ahh you jealous troll
She's gone through puberty you dummy
She's a young woman not a little kid
And she's making history. It would be weird if we didn't take notice
Why is the mile so hard? wrote:
olympichopeful wrote:
28.48 FAT split according to runnerspace. That's not very good for a 4:33 miler.
Shoot, I've done back to back 28 second 200s (i.e., a 56 second 400) a few times this year and have yet to break 5, let alone run a 4:33.
Yeah but that's just emphasizes her Talent is holding a good pace
58 is her 400 PR
But she can hold 70s for a full mile
She's basically the top 1500 in the country
Close to Tops at the 1K and then falls back from the very elite Runners at the 800 and 600
Anyway I think they're smart for focusing on speed. Probably good physically to vary things, give your body a change, work on the kick
I wouldn't go by the time, she looked good
She got the handoff in traffic and was able to catch the girl in front of her who was about 3 m ahead
She was happy afterwards. The time was good enough to get them into the finals but she didn't run in the finals.
For anyone interested North Rockland is probably trying to win Nationals at the DMR
Here were there splits
Girls Distance Medley Varsity Saturday
4
North Rockland 'A'
12:43.68
1) Catherine Ruffino
2) Katelyn Tuohy
3) Rachel Keller
4) Haleigh Morales
# Lap Split
1 3:58.624 3:58.624
2 1:01.523 5:00.147
3 2:33.760 7:33.907
4 5:09.768 12:43.674
Morales ran really well for the mile considering it's early in the season
She'll run the 1200 Tuohy will run the 1600
They always have good sprinters so I'm sure they'll have a good 400
Probably hoping Ruffino can run 225 800
Should be a strong team
1500 will never be her event at that level
5000 and farther is more likely where she will make an impact--maybe eventually the marathon
For those questioning footstrike, here is a sampling taken from the 2012 Olympic Trials
http://biomechanics.byu.edu/footstrikesmens10k.jpg
http://biomechanics.byu.edu/footstrikeswomens10k.jpg
http://biomechanics.byu.edu/footstrikesmens5k.jpg
http://biomechanics.byu.edu/w800final.jpg
http://biomechanics.byu.edu/footstrikes10krupp.jpg
Tuohy's looks just right in comparison to the nation's best runners.
Shirk wrote:
For those questioning footstrike, here is a sampling taken from the 2012 Olympic Trials
http://biomechanics.byu.edu/footstrikesmens10k.jpghttp://biomechanics.byu.edu/footstrikeswomens10k.jpghttp://biomechanics.byu.edu/footstrikesmens5k.jpghttp://biomechanics.byu.edu/w800final.jpghttp://biomechanics.byu.edu/footstrikes10krupp.jpgTuohy's looks just right in comparison to the nation's best runners.
Thank you for the posting on the foot strikes of many successful runners. I raised a non-issue.
there will be a number of other good teams - FM and Beavercreek come quickly to mind as 2 who might get under 11:40. NR needs to find someone who can get to 2:20 for 800 leg or else you get another Penn Relays situation. Last year FM ended up using a 400 runner on the 800 leg due to injury to 800 runner.
Yeah North Rockland got to convince one of their sprinters to step up and pull a fast 800
I don't know why but they never seem to able to get any good 800-meter Runners when they have lots of good sprinters
They always have a bunch of girls who can go sub 60 in the 400 none of those girls can pull a 2:16 800
Anyway it was at least good to see them out at the meet and getting ready for the season
Refreshing to have someone admit to making an error and saying thank you. Too many personal attacks instead of a civil exchange of facts and opinions.
Jedsdead wrote:
Take it up wrote:
Talking about foot mechanics and 200 speed now qualifies as being a pedophile. Got it.
Don't you love the perspective of some people...
Womens sports is constantly fighting for similar recognition (and deservedly so) as mens....yet dimwitted putz's cry perversion when people start watching...
Tuohy is arguably the greatest female XC runner and one of the greatest mid-distance track runners in HS history...but watch her and you're a perv....if it was Pre or Webb, would anyone care?? No. So doesn't that make the dimwit putz just another sexist blowhard??
Seriously, quit with the garbage derogitory comments and maybe grow up just a little!!
+1
Agreed. Talk about female runners, your a pedophile perv..... don’t talk about female runners, the board is full of misogyny
Megan Keith (14:43) DESTROYS Parker Valby's 5000 PB in Shanghai
2024 Boston marathon - The first non-carbon assisted finisher ran..... 2:34
Official Suzhou Diamond League Discussion Thread (7-9 am ET+ Instant Reaction show at 9:05 am ET)
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday