Bizarre shoe fetish wrote:
Your continued and constant obsession with this is just plain weird.
I don't think the obsession is weird at all. In running, a small advantage is huge. There is a new rule, noone has seen it enforced and people want to know what the deal is.
Someone explained to me in another thread that the actual shoe doesn't have be available but similar ones do. So the fact that Jared Ward's Saucony marathon shoe isn't available doesn't matter because Nike has it's own and presumably better shoe out there.
But there is no one else out there with a 4% spike. Perhaps Nike could argue that the 4% flat isn't that much different but I totally understand why someone is obsessed about this. If we have a new rule, we want to see if it will be enforced.
I know I saw a good photo of the spikes somewhere today online. If you find them, please post it.
Note: Typos in Rojo's 2nd sentence have been corrected.