You said "potentially lethal PEDs". The link you provided (see below) did not say "potentially lethal" or for that matter "performance enhancing". Your link EXPLICITLY said it was NOT DOPING, according to an anti-doping expert quoted in the story. If you had said "broke German law" and "potentially dangerous" that would have been more accurate. I did not say anything about Beyer and Straub, and I did not condone breaking German law, but is there any other rational conclusion than one story that explicitly said it is NOT about doping would say nothing about another story that IS about doping? Here's the German link you gave us (in a previous thread):https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/andre-pollmaechers-trainer-bernd-diessner-im-zwielicht.1346.de.html?dram:article_id=195287