That's good stuff there Chad. ?
That's good stuff there Chad. ?
Pretty impressive indeed, remind me not to start an argument with Mindweak.
Oh how clever -- posting as "rekrunnr".
rekrunnr wrote:
No. EPO makes you slower. Look at Jeptoo (clean 2:18, doped 2:24). Kiprop (clean 3:26, dirty 3:33), and now Jepchumba (clean 1:05, dirty 1:06).
This proves that she only microdosed. The rest is mythology and the letsrun non-experts' assumptions.
kljk wrote:
I believe EPO is a placebo, but then again, I work in the pharma industry.
Agree, it is very clever.
rekrunner wrote:
Oh how clever -- posting as "rekrunnr".
rekrunnr wrote:
No. EPO makes you slower. Look at Jeptoo (clean 2:18, doped 2:24). Kiprop (clean 3:26, dirty 3:33), and now Jepchumba (clean 1:05, dirty 1:06).
This proves that she only microdosed. The rest is mythology and the letsrun non-experts' assumptions.
What drug test history? Do we know more than this one drug test result?
factoid wrote:
And yet the drug test result history of this particular athlete suggests exactly this.
rekrunner wrote:
You assume that she could not run faster than 69:29 clean. This is where we part.
[quote]m!ndweak wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
Oh how clever -- posting as "rekrunnr".
It is very clever. ?
casual obsever wrote:
Subway Surfers wrote:
This news is nearly 2 months old.
Indeed. Don't know why Monti came up with that now...
casual obsever wrote:
Subway Surfers wrote:
This news is nearly 2 months old.
Indeed. Don't know why Monti came up with that now...
Possibly because they just released the details of the arbitration case against her? (I’m not sure)
.athleticsintegrity.org/downloads/pdfs/notifications-and-sanctions/en/IAAF-v-Violah-Jepchumba-Final.PDFIt’s worth a read to see how things proceed in reality. Tragi-comic. Repeatedly sending her legalistic emails, when it’s patently clear she doesn’t remotely understand the process or even really the content of what they’re saying. I have no idea of what Jepchumba is like, but it’s not a stretch, given her likely upbringing, to think that she’s semi-literate, poorly educated - plus they’re not even communicating in her language. (Yes, I know that offered her translators, but it doesn’t seem she really understood that either). And the offer that she can find legal support but at her own cost, lol!
I think the AIU has stepped up its game with the recent positives in Kenya, but reading this is pretty disappointing. Where’s the agent in this discussion? Where’s the coach? Why aren’t they going after the supplier? Who’s her sponsor? (Adidas?) Where’s the Bahraini federation? Where’s the plea deal to help get to the truth? And I don’t condone the doping for a second but this isn’t legal due process for someone from her background in her position. Look at what legal and PR spin Froome or Paula were able to come up with when their AAFs came up
Wouldn’t let me post the link correctly, it needs a www. at the start.....
DHT123 wrote:
Wouldn’t let me post the link correctly, it needs a www. at the start.....
A lot of african runners are lab rats and puppets being told what to do, when to run, where to run, and what to take. They come from impoverished environments, and their focus is to bring money and food back to their villages. That's it.
Africans are willing to do any and everything to help their families and villages, and agents and companies know that, so they are preying on them. A lot of runners aren't even seeing the majority of the money they get from winning big races and appearance fees.
When runners get caught doping ( after being told to dope), agents and companies are nowhere to be found, and they simply move on to the next Kenyan to ride.
PEDS are not just simply landing in their laps. They are getting them from somewhere and someone, and since a lot of Kenyan runners are not well educated, they are not researching or studying what to take. .....
Who's her coach & agent? Maybe Canova would know?
And what about Bett? I wonder if he even knows he was taking dope? Maybe he was told it was vitamin shots or something? Btw, anyone know who Bett is coached by? (tried a general search and can't find anything).
When Bahrain, UAE, and all these other middle epo countries go bankrupt after oil dries up then there will be many less dopers.
No all the sport needs is a rule, if you didn't live in that country before you were 15, you can't represent them.
Pronghorn. Husky.
Are you suggesting it's not possible to make an affirmative claim about the cause(s) of the observed 5% improvement without making faith based assumptions? And that different assumptions, with the same facts, will lead to different conclusions?
Rekrunner is a liar wrote:
Based off of no evidence at all, but solely and purely on faith.
rekrunner wrote:
You assume that she could not run faster than 69:29 clean. This is where we part.
Hfhjjgghjj wrote:
You people who believe anything that the con artist Canova says are absolute gullible morons. He makes a living encouraging vulnerable and desperate African athletes to cheat. That's how he makes money which is all he wants. He knows damn well EPO works on anybody like a turbo charge and only cares about getting money from his job as an agent/pimp. He has changed his story many times as do typical liars who are caught in their BS. He started saying Kenyans don't dope at all a long time ago then changed to the BS that top Kenyans don't dope then changed to BS it doesn't work on top Kenyans anyways. This man is a sad excuse for a human being, he is low life scum and is able to get away with his BS because of gullible morons like many on this site.
Rojo, this should be your Quote of the Day.
Great post. Very good discussion points and makes me understand EPO use better.
Banana Bread wrote:
When Bahrain, UAE, and all these other middle epo countries go bankrupt after oil dries up then there will be many less dopers.
What's with Bahrain importing dopers? You would have thought after they were embarrassed so badly by the Ramzi debacle they would be a little more careful about the choice of athletes they recruit to represent their country. ?
Not as dumb as all this name-calling. It is not logic at all, but resisting to make one generous assumption with no basis. If students are caught cheating on a test -- they should be punished for cheating. After they have been adjudicated and sentenced and serving their punishment, if you then want to claim how much cheating improved their test scores -- you need two numbers, and you only have one. You need a reliable and an accurate way to assess what their non-cheating score would have been. It is not because they cheated, that you are permitted to make assumptions in your favor that you could not otherwise make, due to some benefit of the doubt. I can't answer why she needed to dope, because I think she did not need to dope.
This Is Getting Ridiculous wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
You assume that she could not run faster than 69:29 clean. This is where we part.
That's dumb logic Gary. Dopers shouldn't be given the benefit of doubt where one minimizes their doping by saying they could run that fast without doping. That always seems to your style on EPO-positive cases and it makes you sound like a doping apologist. It's analogous to give the benefit of the doubt to students caught cheating on tests by saying it's no big deal because lets assume they could have passed the test anyway. If Jepchumba could have run that fast clean...then why did she need to dope? Huh?
A couple questions about this mitichondria study. Can you help me interpret these statements? "This finding is consistent with the concept that humans have an excess capacity of muscle mitochondria over O2 delivery due to limits of cardiac output during whole body exercise" "The finding of a 22% increase in mitochondrial OXPHOS in the present study indicates that the disparity between O2 delivery and muscle oxidative capacity is even larger with Epo treatment, and the proportional increase in hematocrit and whole body VO2 emphasizes the large dependence on O2 delivery." It looks like this "more and larger mitochondria" study still finds "more rbcs" important. Another question: As far as I can tell, this study doesn't talk about CO2. Where does "the other bonus of more and larger mitochondria is the expulsion of C02 from the cell" come from?
m!ndweak wrote:
you must have missed it, multiple times posted....but anyways
rhEPO, in recent studies have shown that they SIGNIFICANTLY increase the size and number of mitochondria....now you tell me, or anyone else on here who thinks they are smarter than jonO.....what is more important in the aerobic respitory system
1) more rbcs?
or
2) more and larger mitochondria?
here is a simple explanation. with more and larger mitochondria, a greater % of the available 02 floating in the blood is absorbed into the cell for cellular function, the most important in any exercise is that of combining 02 with glucose to created ATP. the other bonus of more and larger mitochondria is the expulsion of C02 from the cell, and a greater capacity to store Calcium, which is ESSENTIAL in the contraction/extension of muscles.
rekrunner wrote:
Not as dumb as all this name-calling.
It is not logic at all, but resisting to make one generous assumption with no basis.
If students are caught cheating on a test -- they should be punished for cheating.
After they have been adjudicated and sentenced and serving their punishment, if you then want to claim how much cheating improved their test scores -- you need two numbers, and you only have one.
You need a reliable and an accurate way to assess what their non-cheating score would have been.
It is not because they cheated, that you are permitted to make assumptions in your favor that you could not otherwise make, due to some benefit of the doubt.
I can't answer why she needed to dope, because I think she did not need to dope.
Still doesn't make sense. ? Does a person rob a bank if they're financial sound and don't need the money? Does a drug addicted spend all their money, blow all their savings, even steal money from relatives, etc., on drugs if the drugs didn't give them the addictive high?
If Jepchumba could run that fast clean why would she dope and risk getting caught like she did? Athletes usually know what their physical limitations are and some accept it while others look to cheat to get faster. One other reason might be to take a shortcut with dope to achieve a certain level by getting more with less training.