Kenya passes new Marriage Act- Guess what it legalizes.......

FelonDJT wrote:

MyKey wrote:

Polygamy is legal in 58 countries around the world

vs 28 (26?) countries where gay marriage is legal.

Very sad but true....

So what? Polygamy is just as valid as a gay "marriage."

Two too too many wrote:

I dont even want to put up with one wife!!

The best story I've heard along those lines is from a family friend. Her dad was a big time lawyer for some Saudi Princes. He got on a private plane and was flying over to Saudi Arabia and talking to the rich guy for the first time. Standard stuff, "Do you have a family? Where do you live etc?" The guy was like, "Yeah I have 8 wives." This US lawyer must have looked at him in fear or something as the Saudi Prince immediately turned to him and said, "8 Saudi wives - one US wife is enough."

MyKey wrote:

1. Why single out Kenya?

2. What does polygamy have to do with running?

I wasn't judging. I was just pointing out a fact. I singled out Kenya because I found the article on a Kenyan website that we check daily for running news. It may not have anything to do directly with running but people are always analyzing why Kenya is better at distance running than us and one reason often cited is culture/way of life.

My main point was "Kenya is still a lot different than the US."

Cult Watch wrote:

Yusef Smith wrote:

One wonders why the Mormons haven't flooded Africa with missionaries...ohright, negroes.

Was referring to this rather than OP

More like "Misinformed POTD."

The first question shouldn't be whether it's fair to the women, unless they're forced into it which is objectionable on its own. If it weren't, they wouldn't choose to do it.

That it does happen shows the fundamental difference, biologically based, between men and women. Men don't know if a baby is theirs, so they have to keep all other men away from their woman. But for women, what matters is material wealth to support their baby, so they have no problem sharing a rich guy with other women. Many would prefer that to being the only wife of a poor man.

Bad Wigins wrote:

The first question shouldn't be whether it's fair to the women, unless they're forced into it which is objectionable on its own. If it weren't, they wouldn't choose to do it.

That it does happen shows the fundamental difference, biologically based, between men and women. Men don't know if a baby is theirs, so they have to keep all other men away from their woman. But for women, what matters is material wealth to support their baby, so they have no problem sharing a rich guy with other women. Many would prefer that to being the only wife of a poor man.

Nice, evidence based, well researched post. I thank you for sharing your heightened wisdom and knowledge with us all.

Bad Wigins wrote:

The first question shouldn't be whether it's fair to the women, unless they're forced into it which is objectionable on its own. If it weren't, they wouldn't choose to do it.

That it does happen shows the fundamental difference, biologically based, between men and women. Men don't know if a baby is theirs, so they have to keep all other men away from their woman. But for women, what matters is material wealth to support their baby, so they have no problem sharing a rich guy with other women. Many would prefer that to being the only wife of a poor man.

booo bad wigins. hissssssssss.

rojo wrote:

No - not Gay Marriage.

Polygamy.

It happened in December but I missed it as I was ironically on paternity leave.

You were on an ironic version of paternity leave? Or you were "on paternity leave, ironically?"

Either way, I dont think you understand what irony means.

I'll give you an example or actual irony:

Despite owning his own business, which he started with his brother using their inheritance, the man is still forced to take paternity leave."

red pill giver wrote:

FelonDJT wrote:

vs 28 (26?) countries where gay marriage is legal.

Very sad but true....

So what? Polygamy is just as valid as a gay "marriage."

. . . which is just as valid as hetero "marriage."

rojo wrote:

MyKey wrote:

1. Why single out Kenya?

2. What does polygamy have to do with running?

I wasn't judging. I was just pointing out a fact. I singled out Kenya because I found the article on a Kenyan website that we check daily for running news. It may not have anything to do directly with running but people are always analyzing why Kenya is better at distance running than us and one reason often cited is culture/way of life.

My main point was "Kenya is still a lot different than the US."

Nah, this was yet another race baiting article and you know it.

This website is fast going down the drain. It is infested with "Alt-Right" bottom feeders. I'm actually astonished that this kind of article is posted by a co-founder of this website. In another thread, which is still standing, there are references to the "Holohoax". Typical.

I'm afraid the time is fast approaching when all decent readers will simply abandon this website and leave the bigots to it. I wonder what the advertisers will say to that.

From Wiki for Sammy Wanjiru:

Personal life

Wanjiru married Mary Wacera, a fellow long-distance runner, in 2009 and the two had a child (Ann) in 2010. He had previously married Triza Njeri in a traditional ceremony and had two children, although Wanjiru and Wacera's marriage was legally binding.[23]

In December 2010 Wanjiru was arrested by Kenyan police at his house in Nyahururu and charged with threatening to kill his wife and illegally possessing an AK-47 rifle. He denied both the accusations and claimed that he was being framed.[24][25]

Wanjiru and his wife Triza Njeri, a beautician, had a daughter Anne Wanjiru and a son Simon Njoroge.[3][26] Wanjiru also had a third wife, Judy Wambui Wairimu, who was pregnant when he died and has since had a son.[27]

Death

On 15 May 2011, Wanjiru died from a fall off a balcony at his home in Nyahururu. Wanjiru appeared to have suffered internal injuries after the fall and was confirmed dead by doctors at a nearby hospital after attempts to revive him failed.[2]

Police said Wanjiru's wife, Triza Njeri, had come home to find him in bed with another woman. She locked the couple in the bedroom and ran outside. Wanjiru then leapt from the balcony.[1] Police are unsure if Wanjiru intended suicide or jumped out of rage, and are investigating the circumstances related to Njeri and his female companion that led to his death.

Polygamy is widely practiced already in Africa, validated both by pre-colonial traditions and Islam--the Muslim population in Africa is 550,000,000 out of 1.2 billion people, and 2.8 million in Kenya.

The only difference between Kenya and the U.S. that you should concern yourself with is that fact that their domination in distance running over the U.S. is total and complete. The reason Kenyan runners are superior to the elite runners in the U.S. is not cultural or hereditary. They work harder. The difference is not talent but character. The sooner the U.S. running community accepts this and starts to train at the Kenyan level the sooner they will be more competitive in the world.

Bad Wigins wrote:

The first question shouldn't be whether it's fair to the women, unless they're forced into it which is objectionable on its own. If it weren't, they wouldn't choose to do it.

That it does happen shows the fundamental difference, biologically based, between men and women. Men don't know if a baby is theirs, so they have to keep all other men away from their woman. But for women, what matters is material wealth to support their baby, so they have no problem sharing a rich guy with other women. Many would prefer that to being the only wife of a poor man.

Would you like some juice to wash down that Red Pill with?

So you're saying Kenyans train so hard so they they can become rich and get more wives (or cows).

Fundamentalist Mormons should just move to Kenya. Problem solved.

Interesting. I wonder if Utah’s unique history with polygamy has anything to do with their disproportionate strength in high school distance running.

Maybe males have more incentive to train like a beast, and fewer distractions?

ezby wrote:

Bad Wigins wrote:

The first question shouldn't be whether it's fair to the women, unless they're forced into it which is objectionable on its own. If it weren't, they wouldn't choose to do it.

That it does happen shows the fundamental difference, biologically based, between men and women. Men don't know if a baby is theirs, so they have to keep all other men away from their woman. But for women, what matters is material wealth to support their baby, so they have no problem sharing a rich guy with other women. Many would prefer that to being the only wife of a poor man.

Nice, evidence based, well researched post. I thank you for sharing your heightened wisdom and knowledge with us all.

2 canned ad-hominems and your weak sarcasm. That's all you kids have got? Can anyone actually prove me wrong?

Bad Wigins wrote:

ezby wrote:

Nice, evidence based, well researched post. I thank you for sharing your heightened wisdom and knowledge with us all.

2 canned ad-hominems and your weak sarcasm. That's all you kids have got? Can anyone actually prove me wrong?

Can you actually prove you right?

ezby wrote:

Bad Wigins wrote:

The first question shouldn't be whether it's fair to the women, unless they're forced into it which is objectionable on its own. If it weren't, they wouldn't choose to do it.

That it does happen shows the fundamental difference, biologically based, between men and women. Men don't know if a baby is theirs, so they have to keep all other men away from their woman. But for women, what matters is material wealth to support their baby, so they have no problem sharing a rich guy with other women. Many would prefer that to being the only wife of a poor man.

Nice, evidence based, well researched post. I thank you for sharing your heightened wisdom and knowledge with us all.

Keep taking those blue pills...