Runners World sexually harasses Jordan Hasay to sell magazines...

fdsfsdfasdfsadf wrote:

Body shaming wrote:

And look at how they were body shaming her by putting "beer and pizza" by her stomach! How thin does she need to be, Runners World? For shame.

POD

+1

It is narcissistic to feel entitled to find fault and offense in something like this magazine cover, and then doubly so to feel compelled to pronounce to the world that entitled sense of being offended. Thanks for pasting a large picture of Hasay's tight ass in tighter tights for all here to see though!

Lobotomy wrote:

I don't think this is a good picture of her. She's a natural beauty and looks awesome in most photos. Runner's World has somehow managed to make her look artificial. She looks like a mannequin. I bet they have 100 pictures from the shoot better than this one and more in their archives. Any amateur could have chosen a better cover shot. Great honor for Jordan, new low for Runner's World. Both well earned.

The picture is awesome and I know photos and the caption is perhaps slightly misplaced, but no more so than all the other magazines. The problem is, the senic always looks for something bad and always finds it.

Whiite Trash wrote:

It is narcissistic to feel entitled to find fault and offense in something like this magazine cover, and then doubly so to feel compelled to pronounce to the world that entitled sense of being offended. Thanks for pasting a large picture of Hasay's tight ass in tighter tights for all here to see though!

You don't really have an eye for sarcasm do you?

Whiite Trash wrote:

It is narcissistic to feel entitled to find fault and offense in something like this magazine cover, and then doubly so to feel compelled to pronounce to the world that entitled sense of being offended. Thanks for pasting a large picture of Hasay's tight ass in tighter tights for all here to see though!

Those who are easily offended should be offended more often.

Senic? Haha pod

Nor do you, retard.

pluser of ones wrote:

Whiite Trash wrote:

It is narcissistic to feel entitled to find fault and offense in something like this magazine cover, and then doubly so to feel compelled to pronounce to the world that entitled sense of being offended. Thanks for pasting a large picture of Hasay's tight ass in tighter tights for all here to see though!

You don't really have an eye for sarcasm do you?

"She's a real cutie pie!!"

_________________________________

You mean her 'pie' is cute?

Yep, it's "senic" alright..

I think you're reading too much into this. It's not like they put a whiner-shaped arrow pointing at her cute butt.

TrackCoach wrote:

Lobotomy wrote:

I don't think this is a good picture of her. She's a natural beauty and looks awesome in most photos. Runner's World has somehow managed to make her look artificial. She looks like a mannequin. I bet they have 100 pictures from the shoot better than this one and more in their archives. Any amateur could have chosen a better cover shot. Great honor for Jordan, new low for Runner's World. Both well earned.

The picture is awesome and I know photos and the caption is perhaps slightly misplaced, but no more so than all the other magazines. The problem is, the senic always looks for something bad and always finds it.

I think the caption was intentionally placed by her butt. Otherwise, they would have used a photo like Molly's:

gregmacd wrote:

TrackCoach wrote:

The picture is awesome and I know photos and the caption is perhaps slightly misplaced, but no more so than all the other magazines. The problem is, the senic always looks for something bad and always finds it.

I think the caption was intentionally placed by her butt. Otherwise, they would have used a photo like Molly's:

https://goo.gl/ZFxPVm

That's a great picture. Looks natural. The Runner's World pic of Jordan looks fake.

Yum Yum wrote:

Nor do you, retard.

Thanks for showing up to announce your stupidity, stupid.

One can only assume that everyone "complaining" about this magazine cover is being sarcastic. Personally, the only thing that offends me about the photo is that Jordan is wearing tights. Above any of her other body features, she has great legs that should be shown off!

she has no but or hips so she cant be offended

Are you kidding me? Have you never seen a magazine cover? This is nothing. How about Cosmo putting the headline "Best Sex Ever" beside Dakota Fanning the month she turned 18, or even worse, Rolling Stone using the headline, "Mary Kate and Ashley, America's Favorite Fantasy" when the Olsen twins were only 17 and underage? I'm sure there are PLENTY of even worse ones out there.

Lightweight headlines wrote:

Are you kidding me? Have you never seen a magazine cover? This is nothing. How about Cosmo putting the headline "Best Sex Ever" beside Dakota Fanning the month she turned 18, or even worse, Rolling Stone using the headline, "Mary Kate and Ashley, America's Favorite Fantasy" when the Olsen twins were only 17 and underage? I'm sure there are PLENTY of even worse ones out there.

Meh on all of those. Rolling Stone's Tsarnaev cover, on the other hand...

Who cares about RW's cover? What actual runner looks at the magazine anyway?

I would like to have a relationship with her. She was 3 years younger than me in high school so it was kind of weird to want a relationship with her then, but now it's not weird at all.