Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
hallant pic wrote:
Thanks Dumbocrats for proving your supreme stupidity.
Trump won. Clinton only won the popular vote due to one state, period.
Yes, alert the media and FBI, "So Manly" is poor little snowflake who's girl lost the election on electoral votes (got slaughtered) and the popular vote (California is one baby whining state).
Is that okay with you princess?
Dude, you're insane. WHY do you think it is a good point to keep saying "if you don't count CA (and your implication is that we shouldn't), then Trump wins popular vote. So Trump really won popular vote." ??? WTF are you talking about?
CA is the BIGGEST state. It has the most voters. OF COURSE WINNING THAT STATE BY A LOT WILL HELP YOUR POPULAR VOTE COUNT. DUH!!!!
You are seriously a dumba$$ if you think this is a good point.
Examples of actual, relevant points you could make:
' Popular vote, though a direct measure of how many people voted for a candidate, doesn't matter as far as who becomes president. Maybe it should, maybe it shouldn't, but it DOESN'T.'
' If popular voted decided the presidency, then Trump would have campaigned harder in CA. This would likely have gotten him more votes in CA, possibly cutting his deficit in popular vote"
{however, he would have maybe lost votes in other places he campaigned hard in, because his expanded time in CA would have taken away from his time spent in those other states, and since CA is very liberal overall, he still would have likely lost it bigly, and still lost the popular vote by a million+ votes}
Feel free to use those ACTUAL, RATIONAL points next you argue about Trump's large popular vote LOSS to Clinton.
You are welcome mr Dumba$$.