Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

If you don't like the law, then go ahead and lobby to have the law changed. That IS the law though.

"Federal law prohibits a foreign national from directly or indirectly making a “contribution or donation of money or other thing of value” in connection with a U.S. election, and prohibits a person from soliciting, accepting or receiving such a contribution or donation from a foreign national. "

We, including our imbecilic President, were educated on that with regard to the Russian investigation. We do NOT allow foreign interference in our election process.

In your ridiculous scenario, YES I would still have the same opinion. I voted for Clinton TWICE and thought he should have not only been impeached for lying under oath but that he should have been removed from office. I am not a Party stooge like you apparently are.

Your stance here in anti-American and flat wrong according to FEDERAL LAW.

Fat hurts wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I said it before. He is my new hero.

It appears we finally have found an honest man in Tiny's administration.

Wait. My bad. That's the acting DNI. I thought it was another story about the ICIG.

So this is new. I'm glad the DNI is standing his ground now but still wondering why he didn't follow the law in the first place.

And another thought.

If the DNI really threatened to resign, there must be some more bombshells to come. I don't think he would be so bold over that one phone call.

agip wrote:

Sally, elected republicans are laughing at people like you, who honestly believe the president is a good guy doing the right thing.

I mean they must be chortling at how low lifes like you believe trump's BS.

https://twitter.com/mitchellreports/status/1176901688139165697?s=20

Agip - I am not exactly a low-life. I likely make much more than you. I can run circles around you. And here you are continually insulting me. Is that how you ride? By insulting those who disagree with you? Nice way to ride.

Fat hurts wrote:

So this is new. I'm glad the DNI is standing his ground now but still wondering why he didn't follow the law in the first place.

I am also glad the DNI is standing his ground, but the reason he went to the White House and the DOJ for guidance first is because as an "Acting" DNI, he really completely owes his job to Trump...he wasn't confirmed...he is a puppet and was likely told he was to behave in that manner.

This is just part of the way that Trump has surrounded himself with YES men...make them "Acting" and don't have them get confirmed. Just more evidence of how awful he is.

Fat hurts wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Wait. My bad. That's the acting DNI. I thought it was another story about the ICIG.

So this is new. I'm glad the DNI is standing his ground now but still wondering why he didn't follow the law in the first place.

And another thought.

If the DNI really threatened to resign, there must be some more bombshells to come. I don't think he would be so bold over that one phone call.

respectable people can argue that the whistleblow report must not be released as the law seems to say. They say the president is exempt - otherwise any whistleblower could mess with presidential right to set foreign policy. It's a real argument.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

Sally, elected republicans are laughing at people like you, who honestly believe the president is a good guy doing the right thing.

I mean they must be chortling at how low lifes like you believe trump's BS.

https://twitter.com/mitchellreports/status/1176901688139165697?s=20

Agip - I am not exactly a low-life. I likely make much more than you. I can run circles around you. And here you are continually insulting me. Is that how you ride? By insulting those who disagree with you? Nice way to ride.

Pretty much done with you, Agip. I never insult anyone here. But you vigorously get your jollies doing so. Not how I ride. You can continue insulting those who disagree with you but it ain't going to be me. Ciao! Oh ... how many languages do you speak? 1? LOL.

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So this is new. I'm glad the DNI is standing his ground now but still wondering why he didn't follow the law in the first place.

I am also glad the DNI is standing his ground, but the reason he went to the White House and the DOJ for guidance first is because as an "Acting" DNI, he really completely owes his job to Trump...he wasn't confirmed...he is a puppet and was likely told he was to behave in that manner.

This is just part of the way that Trump has surrounded himself with YES men...make them "Acting" and don't have them get confirmed. Just more evidence of how awful he is.

As I posted that last post, the DNI says he has NOT said he will resign, disputing the report from the Wall Street Journal.

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So this is new. I'm glad the DNI is standing his ground now but still wondering why he didn't follow the law in the first place.

I am also glad the DNI is standing his ground, but the reason he went to the White House and the DOJ for guidance first is because as an "Acting" DNI, he really completely owes his job to Trump...he wasn't confirmed...he is a puppet and was likely told he was to behave in that manner.

This is just part of the way that Trump has surrounded himself with YES men...make them "Acting" and don't have them get confirmed. Just more evidence of how awful he is.

not completely - as I wrote above, there is a valid argumetn that whistleblowers should not be able to disrupt presidential foreign policy.

Sally Vix wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Agip - I am not exactly a low-life. I likely make much more than you. I can run circles around you. And here you are continually insulting me. Is that how you ride? By insulting those who disagree with you? Nice way to ride.

Pretty much done with you, Agip. I never insult anyone here. But you vigorously get your jollies doing so. Not how I ride. You can continue insulting those who disagree with you but it ain't going to be me. Ciao! Oh ... how many languages do you speak? 1? LOL.

sally anyone who believes utter nonsense and doesn't have the interest to look up the truth of things is a low life in my book. That's you.

if you like, I can use 'fool' or 'ignoramous' - if that makes you feel better.

I think you need to read a little bit more on election law and understand how conflicts in law are resolved. And yes, without a doubt, you are a party stooge.

agip wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

And another thought.

If the DNI really threatened to resign, there must be some more bombshells to come. I don't think he would be so bold over that one phone call.

respectable people can argue that the whistleblow report must not be released as the law seems to say. They say the president is exempt - otherwise any whistleblower could mess with presidential right to set foreign policy. It's a real argument.

In this case though, the whistle blower went to the DNI who went to the IC IG who determined the complaint to be "credible" and of "urgent concern". This not some random person messing with the President.

Actually, there's an interesting thought experiment here. Imagine if Germany had raided raided Deutsche Bank in 2016 and then called Obama and said "Hey you guys need to look at this because there's some seriously shady sh!t here relating to Trump."

Although that doesn't involve a quid-pro-quo and I imagine Germany would contact the FBI instead of Obama directly. Basically, if Trump actually thought Biden was guilty of something, then the proper channels certainly exist to collaborate with Ukrainian law officials. Calling up the president and withholding an already-approved-by-Congress aid package is definitely not the right channel

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Pretty much done with you, Agip. I never insult anyone here. But you vigorously get your jollies doing so. Not how I ride. You can continue insulting those who disagree with you but it ain't going to be me. Ciao! Oh ... how many languages do you speak? 1? LOL.

sally anyone who believes utter nonsense and doesn't have the interest to look up the truth of things is a low life in my book. That's you.

if you like, I can use 'fool' or 'ignoramous' - if that makes you feel better.

My last post with you. Weaklings use insults. Learned people stay above the fray. They don't get in the gutter. You continually get in the gutter with the other low-lifes you so detest. Enjoy the filth down there. You will flourish!

Ernest wrote:

Why did Biden want some Ukrainian prosecutor fired eight times? You'd think once would be sufficient.

FYI: Biden was never president. Trump asked for political help more than 8 times, and that is just from the Ukraine. Putin, Putin, Putin.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

sally anyone who believes utter nonsense and doesn't have the interest to look up the truth of things is a low life in my book. That's you.

if you like, I can use 'fool' or 'ignoramous' - if that makes you feel better.

My last post with you.

Got $20 riding on 2:1 odds that this lasts less than 24 hours.

I’m a bit confused by the Republicans response. Let’s put aside the 400 million Trump put on hold. We still have Trump going to a foreign leader asking him to reopen a closed investigation into his political opponent. Please explain to me how this is remotely OK.

W.W. wrote:

I think you need to read a little bit more on election law and understand how conflicts in law are resolved.

This is not about an election. Election laws do not apply.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

sally anyone who believes utter nonsense and doesn't have the interest to look up the truth of things is a low life in my book. That's you.

if you like, I can use 'fool' or 'ignoramous' - if that makes you feel better.

My last post with you. Weaklings use insults. Learned people stay above the fray. They don't get in the gutter. You continually get in the gutter with the other low-lifes you so detest. Enjoy the filth down there. You will flourish!

actually after re-reading my posts I agree with Sally.

I was over the line - I conflated Rigged with Sally as I multitask.

Sally I apologize - you are not a low life. You are a solid person.

Sally Vix wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Agip - I am not exactly a low-life. I likely make much more than you. I can run circles around you. And here you are continually insulting me. Is that how you ride? By insulting those who disagree with you? Nice way to ride.

Pretty much done with you, Agip. I never insult anyone here. But you vigorously get your jollies doing so. Not how I ride. You can continue insulting those who disagree with you but it ain't going to be me. Ciao! Oh ... how many languages do you speak? 1? LOL.

You have said that to many others before, but you have the brain of a fungus gnat and result to commenting to those people again.

Crikey mate, you speak multiple languages? So, you spread your idiocy in multiple languages? Bananas! What's "idiot racist wanker" in all the languages you speak? You are that no matter the language.