lol ok, your cover is blown now. it's hard to tell the difference between a redhat and a troll sometimes. for sh*tzandgigs, please quote the thousands and millions of illegal murderers you keep suggesting.
lol ok, your cover is blown now. it's hard to tell the difference between a redhat and a troll sometimes. for sh*tzandgigs, please quote the thousands and millions of illegal murderers you keep suggesting.
That wall around the Kremlin obviously didn’t stop donald from getting in...
see, this is the problem with mag@s. They know nothing.
Dude. the ENTIRE PREMISE of postwar American diplomacy, the whole thing, which trump has been systematically destroying piece by piece, is that if you build up the world economy with rules based trade and multilateral arrangements and interweaving economies...THEN EVERYONE WINS. The US wins, Guatemala wins, China wins, and we don't go shooting at each other.
Since the US imposed this system the world has had the most incredible rise out of poverty and reduction in inequality the world will ever see. And there have been no major power wars in that time.
And that's leaving out direct aid like the marshall plan.
So yeah that's what the US used to do. Now trump is tearing it apart. Which will conly cause more poverty and MORE illegal immigration. Morans.
So yeah, trade deals and other help is the way to slow illegal immigration.
I mean, why do you think illegal immigration has been falling for decades? Why? Why?
The answer is that other nations are becoming wealthier enough to keep more of their young people. That's the reason.
But m@gas are trying to reverse that. dumb, dumb, dumb.
dkty6 wrote:
I doubt it. I think Mueller has a *long* way to go. This case is like a hydra: There are probably now more avenues to be investigated than anyone had imagined when Mueller was getting started. For one example, the Manafort data transfer to Russia--while extraordinarily significant (more than some people seem to grasp)--is going to open up more trails that need to be examined.
This may be new news to the general public but it's likely old enough news to the Special Counsel that he's well on the way to having it investigated.
agip wrote:
If you don't have a response, then stop being condescending and dont reply.
here is your first reading assignment! Have fun, man. You'll be a democrat in 6 weeks. (not. I'm under no impression that any m@gahead will ever change her mind about anything)
Here, showing that building the wall costs the nation a fortune and doesn't stop the illegal immigration.
"Their conclusion? It would hurt the U.S. economy because there would be fewer workers and lower output. It would also have a tiny impact on illegal immigration, and U.S. workers wouldn’t be better off."
"“Our research shows that building a wall was an ineffective way of reducing migration,” Allen said after presenting the new research paper this weekend at the American Economic Association conference. “It was expensive to build, and it harmed U.S. workers.”
"Expanding the wall would reduce the number of Mexican workers in the United States by 144,000 — about 1 percent — the economists found after extensive modeling and data analysis."
"“This suggests that for each fewer migrant in the United States as a result of the Secure Fence Act, GDP declined by $30,000 (in addition to the direct costs of wall construction),” the economists wrote."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/01/08/three-economists-ran-numbers-trumps-border-wall-they-find-its-bad-investment/?utm_term=.c1abb4583a5f[/quote]
Thanks, I read it with an open mind. But I will say even before I read it, there are a lot of programs in the US that cost money that keeps our country safe.
So even if it isn't financially a smart idea, it saves lives and millions of crimes being committed. I hope they took that into account when writing this article? I doubt it, but let me see.
I read it and I really thought it was crap.
If you really think that a Mexican benefits this country by 30K per year, then I don't know what to say. I am sure I don't even benefit this country half of that. So all of these lawn jobs and such, brings in more money than a minimum wage job with no taxes? That is just dumb.
Even if it did, it didn't even say that a wall wouldn't work. Of course a wall done properly would work.
But if you are hoping that the way to get rid of illegals is from a recession, which is what they say is effective, well, I hope not as I like to keep my job regardless of it keeps Mexicans from coming over or not.
And again, it only costs Americans 7 dollars per person to build a wall and stop millions of crimes that happen from illegals. I will tell you, 7 dollars is worth it to me if they are even right, which I don't think so.
You should watch this and see if it makes sense. I look forward to your response. Let's see if the crowd agreed with you.
https://youtu.be/PettvYLrLLMThus far no one caught in Muellers’ net has been charged with collusion? Not Kelly, not Manafort, etc.
Trump will not be charged with collusion either.
He will finish his term and remain a threat in 2020.
One just needs to look at Europe to understand effective immigration management. If you disalllow businesses from hiring undocumented workers they have very little incentive to come. They have a self inflicted migrant crisis right now, but these people don’t have any permanent way to make a living, so once out of the temporary asylum system they have little recourse but to go back home. I don’t fully agree with 100% strict employment laws but just saying they are effective in reducing immigration.
The main immigration issue in the US has always been what to do about the millions that have been living here for so long and their kids, but we have always benefited tremendously from a strong flow of cheap labor.
My main point is Trump’s wall/fence/steel bars neither resolves the legal status of millions residing here nor does it prevent immigration that actually benefits us anyway. It certainly wouldn’t stop drugs and criminals from crossing. It’s just a total waste of money and would serve as a negative symbol. It is not American.
agip wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Mymymy how Democratic hypocrites conveniently forget.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/01/08/howie-carr-dems-flip-flop-on-border-security/no hypocrisy
virtually NOBODY is for open borders or whatever trump says the Dems are for. NOBODY. Maybe a few hardcore right wing libertarians who think government is bad.
Trump has masterfully taught his weak-brained followers that the Dems aren't for border security. While your article shows that the Dems are for border security.
The Dems need to make that clear and then explain why an ocean to gulf wall is impossible and stupid.
Instead they say 'no wall' which makes it sound like they don't want any walls.
Correction. They "were for border security". Or at least they said so when it was politically expedient and furthered their own goals. You think the sanctuary city/state policies that exist in many if not all Democratically controlled cities/states indicate that they are still? You think that they are for border security given that in many cities, local police and courts aren't allowed to inform ICE when a criminal alien is set free? If so, you're clearly delusional and part of the problem. I wonder what Kate Steinle's family thinks? Or the families of the cops killed in CA by illegal's? I'd be happy with the combination of a wall where it makes sense, along with other high tech barriers and early warning mechanisms there it may not be.
[quote]asians r not REALLYLLYYY hot wrote:
lol ok, your cover is blown now. it's hard to tell the difference between a redhat and a troll sometimes.
for sh*tzandgigs, please quote the thousands and millions of illegal murderers you keep suggesting.
[quote]asian r reallly hot wrote:
Thank you for changing you name a little bit, but still Asians are hot dude/dudet!
Why don't you look at the stats before you tell someone they are wrong. Please show me where there haven't been thousands and millions?
I will show you stats since you obviously don't know but have the time to go on here and talk about something you don't know anything about.
"Government Accountability Office (GAO) report in which they say the research reveals about 12 Americans a day are killed by illegal aliens, though the findings have been challenged by researchers. Immigration reformers have been frustrated for decades by the federal government’s lack of fully quantified data on the number of Americans killed every year by illegal aliens.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/320/316959.pdf
In Texas alone last year, there was over 1000 killed by illegals. That is just one state. But people suggest this is a money or racist issue.
Every country on earth wants to protect its boarders, how in the hell does this country have an issue with it. I know why, but that's too long to type.
well you completely skipped over the part where it says the wall would not materially reduce illegal immigration. Which is the whole reason for the wall, right? If it doesnt' work then why have it?
As for crime, that's a tricky one. I'll separate from most Dems by agreeing that illegal immigration does increase crime. If you are that victim, then it sucks to be you.
But
The US is running the lowest crime rates since the 1960s in most ways. Crime has been falling, falling, falling. I don't see how a few thousand more crimes committed by illegals matters a whole lot, when 99% of the crime is committed by US citizens. I mean if you are serious about slowing crime more, then do something about handguns, and cut spend billions to lower recidivism. That would lower crime. But it's not politically useful to Rs so they won't do it.
Whereas calling illegals murderers, rapists and bearers of disease brings out the vote, so that's what trump does.
Sick.
Any anyway, an ocean to gulf wall won't stop illegals, so the whole premise is lame. They'll still come. They will still commit crimes. Might as well not steal land from locals, spend hundreds of billions of useless dollars, wreck the environment if they are coming anyway.
asian r reallly hot wrote:
I really don't understand why people don't get this.
…
I just don't understand why people don't get this.
You already expressed your utter ignorance.
There is no need for you to continue doing so.
Trollminator wrote:
The main immigration issue in the US has always been what to do about the millions that have been living here for so long and their kids, but we have always benefited tremendously from a strong flow of cheap labor.
My main point is Trump’s wall/fence/steel bars neither resolves the legal status of millions residing here nor does it prevent immigration that actually benefits us anyway. It certainly wouldn’t stop drugs and criminals from crossing. It’s just a total waste of money and would serve as a negative symbol. It is not American.
Yes dude, most everyone who wants a wall, wants companies to be penalized when hiring illegals. You are preaching to the choir but to the right (not the rich, they don't give a F about regular folk), not the left.
The fact that millions have come here and sucked the tit from America isn't my problem. I have friends who spent 10 years going through visas and immigration to come here legally and many friends who cant get a visa here at all.
So you want to say FU to all of those trying to do it legally and then let the one who said FU to our laws by coming here illegally.
Nice!
XY wrote:
Thus far no one caught in Muellers’ net has been charged with collusion? Not Kelly, not Manafort, etc.
Trump will not be charged with collusion either.
.
Conspirancy you moran.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Correction. They "were for border security".
YAWN!
The majority of ALREADY fenced border is along democratic states.
The VAST majority of NO STINKING WALLS/FENCES ON OUR BORDER LAND is along republican Texas.
asian r reallly hot wrote:
In Texas alone last year, there was over 1000 killed by illegals. That is just one state. But people suggest this is a money or racist issue.
Every country on earth wants to protect its boarders, how in the hell does this country have an issue with it. I know why, but that's too long to type.
1. There were 1,478 murders in texas in 2016. Your view is that 'over 1000' of them were committed by illegals? Please copy/paste or link. That would change my mind on a few things if true.
2. This country does not have an issue with protecting its borders. Trump wants you to think we do.
3. Many countries have zero border controls. Zero. Zilch.
asian r reallly hot wrote:
And Trump knows that without a wall, he won't get elected again
And that's one of the major reasons that the wall will never happen. Democrats simply won't allow it.
Tiny had his chance when the R's had full control of congress. He could have traded the wall for DACA, but he killed the deal at the last minute.
Just face it. The wall is dead. Not gonna happen.
I didn't skip over it, I didn't see anything that made me believe them. I have stats showing the wall in California worked wonders. I can get them if you like?
See you say 99% of the crime is done by Americans. Gosh, you are wrong, again. Why can't people actually go look at the stats.
Nearly 95 percent of foreign nationals in federal prison are illegal aliens, while the Bureau of Prisons data has revealed that about one-in-five inmates are foreign-born. There are close to 40,000 criminal illegal and legal immigrants incarcerated in federal prisons across the country, making up about 21 percent of the total federal prison population. Nearly all of those inmates are from Central and South America, resulting in a cost to U.S. taxpayers of about $1.4 billion every year.
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Alien_Incarceration_Report_OIS_FY17_Q4_2.pdfBefore you have such opinions, at least know the stats. It is sick that you don't even know that stats but have the balls to call someone sick!
My friend who is a teacher isnt even allowed to ask her student for his/her SS# during registration in the beginning of the year because of illegals. What country on earth makes it's locals scared to ask its people for their ID#. Only Democrats who try to start race crap every 5 min.
Fat hurts wrote:
asian r reallly hot wrote:
And Trump knows that without a wall, he won't get elected again
And that's one of the major reasons that the wall will never happen. Democrats simply won't allow it.
Tiny had his chance when the R's had full control of congress. He could have traded the wall for DACA, but he killed the deal at the last minute.
Just face it. The wall is dead. Not gonna happen.
Agreed, he F'ed up not getting it done earlier. I do think he will cave or give DACA or something to get the wall.
He knows that without this wall, he wont ever get a 2nd term. And we all know Trump cares about himself most of all.
So to go into a chicken fight with an Egomaniac, not sure I would want to do that. They (trump) b crazy!
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06