Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

All of this winning regarding refuting the already debunked notion that Hillary lied under oath has made me BRIEFLY forget the main thing...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done...OH, and the biggest I Told You So in the history of Letsrun is coming from me to you Trumpers.

And, when Trump is gone, headlines in more places than one will read, "You're Fired!"

Flagpole wrote:

All of this winning regarding refuting the already debunked notion that Hillary lied under oath has made me BRIEFLY forget the main thing...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done...OH, and the biggest I Told You So in the history of Letsrun is coming from me to you Trumpers.

And, when Trump is gone, headlines in more places than one will read, "You're Fired!"

And Trump will "win" a real Time Magazine cover.

Gary, what kind of sh1t website is that? magapill? Garbage, garbage, garbage.

Oh, you and "Rigged for Hillary" seem to post at similar times. Is that another one of your alts?

Democrats lose again

Flagpole wrote:

Noticer of dominance wrote:

YES, Comey did. Wanna bet? She clearly lied and I'll happily post the video that you've already seen but refuse to acknowledge. Gosh oh mighty you are one dumb old man.

http://checkyourfact.com/2017/12/05/fact-check-did-hillary-clinton-lie-to-the-fbi/

Here's the important pull out - “We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI,” Comey testified.

Check this too -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsxwtW6PWSc

Flagpole wins. Game. Set. Match.

the untruths were told to Congress, not the FBI

sorry flagpole, this link https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/07/11/chaffetz-goodlatte-clinton-perjury-congress/86964558/

LOL ... TWO YEARS AGO, Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Bob Goodlatte (R-Va) sent a letter demanding an investigation into their claims of Clinton lying. . . . From your link, "Chaffetz and Goodlatte offered no details in their request letter." Typical partisan repubs--low-IQ--demand something and fail to support your claim.

blahgovich wrote:

sorry flagpole, this link

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/07/11/chaffetz-goodlatte-clinton-perjury-congress/86964558/

look, HRC told congress a few things that turned out not to be true. That is not debatable. Whether she knew she was telling untrue things is the quesiton. I don't know the answer and either do you.

I forgot that in addition to never being able to defend Trump based on his own merits, some of the more obsessed ones think they are winning an argument by posting random Obama and Hillary links every night and weekend. Links to people who are irrelevant + no substance in the post = deplorable dumb dumb.

sent a letter . . . wrote:

LOL ... TWO YEARS AGO, Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Bob Goodlatte (R-Va) sent a letter demanding an investigation into their claims of Clinton lying. . . . From your link, "Chaffetz and Goodlatte offered no details in their request letter." Typical partisan repubs--low-IQ--demand something and fail to support your claim.

blahgovich wrote:

sorry flagpole, this link

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/07/11/chaffetz-goodlatte-clinton-perjury-congress/86964558/

Do you honestly think he even bothered to read the article in his own post? He saw a picture of Clinton in the article and read the headline and concluded that was proof. Now you see why it didn't take much for Trump to dupe these folks. Only reason to keep bringing up debunked suspicions about Hillary and conspiracy theories about Obama is they feel pretty stupid about their vote but instead of swallowing their pride they are tripling down on stupid.

blahgovich wrote:

sorry flagpole, this link

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/07/11/chaffetz-goodlatte-clinton-perjury-congress/86964558/

She just lied over and over again the the people of the US. No big deal.

Trollminator wrote:

Do you honestly think he even bothered to read the article in his own post? He saw a picture of Clinton in the article and read the headline and concluded that was proof. Now you see why it didn't take much for Trump to dupe these folks. Only reason to keep bringing up debunked suspicions about Hillary and conspiracy theories about Obama is they feel pretty stupid about their vote but instead of swallowing their pride they are tripling down on stupid.

Same MO as their leader who never knows anything about anything aside from getting his name out there as often as possible. Read details? LOL!

The Fokus wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Do you honestly think he even bothered to read the article in his own post? He saw a picture of Clinton in the article and read the headline and concluded that was proof. Now you see why it didn't take much for Trump to dupe these folks. Only reason to keep bringing up debunked suspicions about Hillary and conspiracy theories about Obama is they feel pretty stupid about their vote but instead of swallowing their pride they are tripling down on stupid.

Same MO as their leader who never knows anything about anything aside from getting his name out there as often as possible. Read details? LOL!

How about the eagles debacle. So the president invites the team, some of the players say they don’t want to go, so instead of hosting the ones who did want to go he decides to punish the whole team for failing his patriotism test while the ones who did want to go never once kneeled and protested during the season - so he punishes them???

Trump patrionizes anyone who doesn’t pass his love-for-the-dear-leader tests, calling them SOBs, accusing them of not loving and respecting their country, all the while he made his money on the back of poor taxpayers and dodged that draft without a second thought... fat worthless bast@rd

Trollminator wrote:

How about the eagles debacle. So the president invites the team, some of the players say they don’t want to go, so instead of hosting the ones who did want to go he decides to punish the whole team for failing his patriotism test while the ones who did want to go never once kneeled and protested during the season - so he punishes them???

Trump patrionizes anyone who doesn’t pass his love-for-the-dear-leader tests, calling them SOBs, accusing them of not loving and respecting their country, all the while he made his money on the back of poor taxpayers and dodged that draft without a second thought... fat worthless bast@rd

There were reports that under 10 (and as few as 2) players plus the owner and mascot planned to show up at the White House. So this is just Trump saving face.

Trump just lied that the Eagles didn't want to come to the White House because they didn't want to stand for the anthem.

Trump lied saying he didn't dictate what his son should say about his pre election collusion, I mean meeting with Russians in the summer of 2016.

Trump lied about not knowing about the hush payment to Stormy Daniels and lied about his reimbursements to Michael Cohen.

Trump lied to the head of Canada about the trade deficit.

The whole premise of Trump avoiding a Mueller interview is that it is not a crime to tell all of these lies the press and the American people but it is a crime to lie in a formal investigation.

And he can't help but lie.

Any oath situation with Trump is always a perjury trap because he doesn't know how to string two sentences together without telling a lie.

If he testifies, he will lie.

Agreed - there is no strategy here. It’s just a fat fvck with a giant ego thinking it’s totally ok to lie through his teeth, whether to reporters, his wife or investigators and who believes he’s above it all - that he should get away with it because the country has accepted him and he’s almighty. Of course, he’s got endless bottom feeding minions around him to enable his attitude further and inflate his bravado.

Trollminator wrote:

I forgot that in addition to never being able to defend Trump based on his own merits, some of the more obsessed ones think they are winning an argument by posting random Obama and Hillary links every night and weekend. Links to people who are irrelevant + no substance in the post = deplorable dumb dumb.

It's as simple as, "Who? That was so long ago. It's irrelevant." And it is. 2016 is almost 2 years ago.

Treasury won't commit to putting Harriet Tubman on $20 bill:

Raaaaaaaccciiiiissssssttttsssss.

However, that doesn’t appear to be the case. Video footage taken Tuesday shows Trump attempting to sing along to the national anthem at the White House during a “Celebration of America” event. The president appears to lose interest around the line, “were so gallantly streaming.”

Shocked!!! Child throwing tantrum about something he knows nothing about.

Yep. I won this argument.

sent a letter . . . wrote:

LOL ... TWO YEARS AGO, Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Bob Goodlatte (R-Va) sent a letter demanding an investigation into their claims of Clinton lying. . . . From your link, "Chaffetz and Goodlatte offered no details in their request letter." Typical partisan repubs--low-IQ--demand something and fail to support your claim.

blahgovich wrote:

sorry flagpole, this link

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/07/11/chaffetz-goodlatte-clinton-perjury-congress/86964558/