Cnn are the ones who reported that he was briefed on it, which may not be correct.
Cnn are the ones who reported that he was briefed on it, which may not be correct.
Runningart2004 wrote:
Page 27:
"Two knowledgeable St Petersburg sources claim Republican candidate Trump has paid bribes and engaged in sexual activities...."
Would this be something out of character for him? I don't think so...."grab her by the P..."
Alan
Saying it is plausible is a long way from saying it is true.
His Billy Bush audio noted that he didn't have to pay women to do anything, they just let him do whatever he wanted. Why would he then go to Russia to get his jollies? Total media hit job. Ridiculous. I'd be so embarrassed to work for any organization connected to this. The document passed around was embarrassingly vague and looked like it was typed up by a high schooler.
wait until the MSM realizes its been fooled by a 4chan poster, serious cognitive dissonance on order.
cnn is SPRINTING away from the story:
its fake news, sorry
During the Clinton administration, we heard endless stories about Whitewater. But Clinton disclosed all of his business dealings and produced his tax returns. We know almost nothing about Trump's dealings with Russia. He won't release his tax returns or disclose the full extent of his dealings with Russia. Trump's debts could be over $1.5 billion depending on whether you count businesses that he has more than a 30% stake. He now has liens on his DC hotel because he has not paid over $5 million to subs. His credit is generally regarded as terrible due to past bankruptcies and numerous failed ventures. There is concern that he might have a substantial debt with a Russian bank that could be used against him.
The dossier is not fake news. There is confidence that it comes from a former British intelligence official. Whether the content is true or not has not been substantiated. Media outlets would normally be able to at least know whether a president had business dealings that would take a step towards investigating whether the dossier is accurate. But Trump won't give out any of that information. Unfortunately, given the importance of making sure that the President of the USA is not beholden to a foreign power, it may just be appropriate to throw off the journalistic gloves and put the allegations out there for all to see in order to find out if there is any merit. That is not how it should work, but Trump is the one to blame for that.
Liberals today, this morning, were whispering that bad news would come out on Trump today.
Haha
He turned it around.
Smart people turned it around
And CNN is running in the other direction.
Haha
Funny that
Honestly I think the big news is that the intelligence community is intentionally leaking stories which have the potential to seriously harm the president, even though they apparently can't confirm anything in that memo.
Bingo
But did the current Prez force them to do it?
Was the FBI forced to not charge Hillary?
Someone around election time said CIA could be fight a war on US soil against own people.
(I forget the circumstances surrounding this claim).
But at some point whistle blowers need to speak out if things are turning into poop poop, the S word.
See some people just want to see the World burn. (Remember batman?)
Also, when some people touch something, it turns to poop poop, the S word.
At some point people won't feel sorry for CIA or NSA or DIA.
Hopefully there love for the National Anthem and the Flag doesn't sour.
fake newsman identifier wrote:
Fake news Buzzfeed and CNN get schlonged and go home devastated!
Yes, and the whole Golden Shower matter does bring new meaning to the technique known as "leaking sensitive information."
random6 wrote:
cnn is SPRINTING away from the story:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/01/11/tapper-buzzfeed-trump-russia-report-irresponsible-i-would-be-upset-about-it-too-we-did-not-publish-it/its fake news, sorry
CNN also sprinted away from calling Assange a pedophile. WikiLeaks tweeted that CNN had 48 hours to retract the comment, or they would file a lawsuit... CNN retracted the next day.
CNN is 'fake news'.
If you get your 'news' from CNN, YOU ARE AN IDIOT.
Interesting times wrote:
random6 wrote:cnn is SPRINTING away from the story:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/01/11/tapper-buzzfeed-trump-russia-report-irresponsible-i-would-be-upset-about-it-too-we-did-not-publish-it/its fake news, sorry
CNN also sprinted away from calling Assange a pedophile. WikiLeaks tweeted that CNN had 48 hours to retract the comment, or they would file a lawsuit... CNN retracted the next day.
CNN is 'fake news'.
If you get your 'news' from CNN, YOU ARE AN IDIOT.
CNN is not fake news. Stay on planet earth, willya?
Mr. Obvious wrote:
Honestly I think the big news is that the intelligence community is intentionally leaking stories which have the potential to seriously harm the president, even though they apparently can't confirm anything in that memo.
Things are going to get VERY interesting after the inauguration. The 'defamation' suits will be epic, and will change media for a very long time.
The political left better hold on tight, because they are not in a good position.
Awww yes, my good friend, go gop... so ironic of you to show up now.
2 Russian trolls working this thread. For what purpose.
Precious Roy wrote:
During the Clinton administration, we heard endless stories about Whitewater. But Clinton disclosed all of his business dealings and produced his tax returns. We know almost nothing about Trump's dealings with Russia. He won't release his tax returns or disclose the full extent of his dealings with Russia. Trump's debts could be over $1.5 billion depending on whether you count businesses that he has more than a 30% stake. He now has liens on his DC hotel because he has not paid over $5 million to subs. His credit is generally regarded as terrible due to past bankruptcies and numerous failed ventures. There is concern that he might have a substantial debt with a Russian bank that could be used against him.
The dossier is not fake news. There is confidence that it comes from a former British intelligence official. Whether the content is true or not has not been substantiated. Media outlets would normally be able to at least know whether a president had business dealings that would take a step towards investigating whether the dossier is accurate. But Trump won't give out any of that information. Unfortunately, given the importance of making sure that the President of the USA is not beholden to a foreign power, it may just be appropriate to throw off the journalistic gloves and put the allegations out there for all to see in order to find out if there is any merit. That is not how it should work, but Trump is the one to blame for that.
You are an educated idiot... Which makes you dangerous and thus should be regulated.
My Precious wrote:
Precious Roy wrote:During the Clinton administration, we heard endless stories about Whitewater. But Clinton disclosed all of his business dealings and produced his tax returns. We know almost nothing about Trump's dealings with Russia. He won't release his tax returns or disclose the full extent of his dealings with Russia. Trump's debts could be over $1.5 billion depending on whether you count businesses that he has more than a 30% stake. He now has liens on his DC hotel because he has not paid over $5 million to subs. His credit is generally regarded as terrible due to past bankruptcies and numerous failed ventures. There is concern that he might have a substantial debt with a Russian bank that could be used against him.
The dossier is not fake news. There is confidence that it comes from a former British intelligence official. Whether the content is true or not has not been substantiated. Media outlets would normally be able to at least know whether a president had business dealings that would take a step towards investigating whether the dossier is accurate. But Trump won't give out any of that information. Unfortunately, given the importance of making sure that the President of the USA is not beholden to a foreign power, it may just be appropriate to throw off the journalistic gloves and put the allegations out there for all to see in order to find out if there is any merit. That is not how it should work, but Trump is the one to blame for that.
You are an educated idiot... Which makes you dangerous and thus should be regulated.
Don't you just love the hypocrisy of educated idiots? My favorite...
Unfortunately, given the importance of making sure that the President of the USA is not beholden to a foreign power, it may just be appropriate to throw off the journalistic gloves and put the allegations out there for all to see in order to find out if there is any merit.
I wonder how the left ever supported HRC after her pay-to-play schemes with brutal foreign powers such as Saudi Arabia were exposed?
Interesting times wrote:
My Precious wrote:You are an educated idiot... Which makes you dangerous and thus should be regulated.
Don't you just love the hypocrisy of educated idiots? My favorite...
Unfortunately, given the importance of making sure that the President of the USA is not beholden to a foreign power, it may just be appropriate to throw off the journalistic gloves and put the allegations out there for all to see in order to find out if there is any merit.
I wonder how the left ever supported HRC after her pay-to-play schemes with brutal foreign powers such as Saudi Arabia were exposed?
It doesn't matter. It was time for a woman to be President and Hillary was it. This country failed because of fake news.