California running mom Sherri Papini, who went missing but found 3 weeks later, is finally arrested for lying about abduction

Feels like this one is about to get really interesting.

Working Harder wrote:

Feels like this one is about to get really interesting.

So, she said she was kidnapped by 2 woman and realeased on Thanksgiving day. Then we learn she faked her abduction years ago, and met up with a guy from Michigan 2 days before she disappeared. She said she cut her foot, although there was no cut. Also, why did her husband say "they" grabbed her on the 911 call, like he knew there was more than 1 abductor?

Blow to the narrative.

http://nypost.com/2017/11/07/video-shows-abducted-jogger-unshackled-running-to-safety/

This surprises no one.

I said from the start she had a lover. Sure enough she was texting some dude. A lot of effort just to cheat. I guess she wanted a vaca from her family.

Often overlooked is the fact she was found in YOLO County.

Sherri Papini, 34, was spotted in the footage briskly heading to Interstate 5 in Yolo County at about 4 a.m. Nov. 24, 2016, according to the the Shasta County Sheriff’s Office.

moist wrote:

Often overlooked is the fact she was found in YOLO County.

Low crime. Nearly 70% white. Median family income $75k. Home of UC Davis.

It doesn't sound like a blow to the narrative at all. She weighed 87 pounds when released, had a broken nose and was branded on the shoulder. Plus she had DNA from two people on her body. The LA Times story doesn't say anything about this video casting doubt on her story.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-sherri-papini-video-20171107-story,amp.html

Huh??? wrote:

It doesn't sound like a blow to the narrative at all. She weighed 87 pounds when released, had a broken nose and was branded on the shoulder. Plus she had DNA from two people on her body. The LA Times story doesn't say anything about this video casting doubt on her story.

She is into kinky sex. She was already an anorexic. Here story is very doubtful and full of inconistancies, say real police detectives.

"After all"?! We called this a blatant fraud from the start-- you can look it up.

Scammers, cultists, probably meth and almost certainly extra-marital sex... nothing about the initial story was "true."

The video may not prove anything, but there are enough clues to establish that this alleged kidnapping was a hoax. Although the police know it is a hoax, the police will never say so. This is because they don't want to be sued by the Papini's for emotional distress. This is what happened when the Vallejo police said that the the kidnapping of Denise Huskins and Aaron Quinn was a hoax, and it turned out to be an actual kidnapping with bizarre facts:

http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article159792624.html

rockford wrote:

"After all"?! We called this a blatant fraud from the start-- you can look it up.

Scammers, cultists, probably meth and almost certainly extra-marital sex... nothing about the initial story was "true."

She's got all the makin's of a good distance runner.

Kinky S wrote:

Huh??? wrote:

It doesn't sound like a blow to the narrative at all. She weighed 87 pounds when released, had a broken nose and was branded on the shoulder. Plus she had DNA from two people on her body. The LA Times story doesn't say anything about this video casting doubt on her story.

She is into kinky sex. She was already an anorexic. Here story is very doubtful and full of inconistancies, say real police detectives.

Which real police detectives? Do you have links?

Links? wrote:

Kinky S wrote:

She is into kinky sex. She was already an anorexic. Here story is very doubtful and full of inconistancies, say real police detectives.

Which real police detectives? Do you have links?

So, you want links to Huh??? and you.

Saw the thread title and thought someone had a new article. This one seems to confirm more than defeat her claims.

I was thinking the "branding" was going to be a car cigarette lighter burn, but article says it looks like it is suppose to be writing.

Still don't believe her.

The NYPost story linked is from Oct 25th. There was another article today regarding the video.

The odd thing about what is shown in the video is the fact that she runs towards the church, presumably from wherever she was let off and then she runs back in the same direction she came from. If I was running from someone, I wouldn't head back towards them.

The restraints she was found with were around her waist, so she could still run with that. I don't entirely believe this was a hoax. She lost like 20-30lbs, was burned and branded. That's not something you would voluntarily put yourself through. Someone did something to her whoever it was-and she may have been so traumatized that it may have been hard to make out male or female-I do remember reading somewhere they had her blind folded most of the time.

I personally know the people in the Vallejo case and remember saying that there was know way they would make that story up, even though everyone was saying it was fake. And then turned out it wasn't fake! I just have a feeling this case isn't fake either.

The LA Times story says she ran to the church looking for help, but no one was there so she went back in the other direction.