juxtaposition wrote:
All posts with this username after the first one are someone else trolling. I went to one of Harvard, Princeton, Yale. Studied a hard science.
Wow thanks for clarifying!
I'm so impressed!
Can I buy you a soda?
juxtaposition wrote:
All posts with this username after the first one are someone else trolling. I went to one of Harvard, Princeton, Yale. Studied a hard science.
Wow thanks for clarifying!
I'm so impressed!
Can I buy you a soda?
No need for a soda, but you should be impressed. It was a very hard science.
asdfasddfasdfasdfasdfaslfjkas wrote:
juxtaposition wrote:All posts with this username after the first one are someone else trolling. I went to one of Harvard, Princeton, Yale. Studied a hard science.
Wow thanks for clarifying!
I'm so impressed!
Can I buy you a soda?
3 yrs ago. My actual major was physics, but my honors thesis was on the astro part of physics. So f off, mooron.
juxtaposition wrote:
3 yrs ago. My actual major was physics, but my honors thesis was on the astro part of physics. So f off, mooron.
Fail.
You said it that major was offered when you went there.
But it wasn't a major offered there.
Now you say that it wasn't your major?
Why are you ashamed of your community college-tier education anon?
LOL
juxtaposition wrote:
No need for a soda, but you should be impressed. It was a very hard science.
It never went soft? Not even once?
juxtaposition wrote:
All posts with this username after the first one are someone else trolling. I went to one of Harvard, Princeton, Yale. Studied a hard science.
Do you have any thoughts on how to live life as a highly gifted person in a world absolutely not set up for highly gifted people? Do you feel you have many equals? The only way I've been able to find people I find interesting is to read books and watch interviews with people like Gladwell, Hitchens, Harris, Chomsky, Sacks, Pinker, Sowell, etc. My ultimate goal is to become one of them, basically.
unrecognized wrote:
juxtaposition wrote:All posts with this username after the first one are someone else trolling. I went to one of Harvard, Princeton, Yale. Studied a hard science.
Do you have any thoughts on how to live life as a highly gifted person in a world absolutely not set up for highly gifted people? Do you feel you have many equals? The only way I've been able to find people I find interesting is to read books and watch interviews with people like Gladwell, Hitchens, Harris, Chomsky, Sacks, Pinker, Sowell, etc. My ultimate goal is to become one of them, basically.
All of those people would be creeped out by you.
unrecognized wrote:
Part of that is because on standardized tests I always scored at about the 98th national percentile. What I didn't realize is that I scored at the 98th percentile because I have a mismatch in cognitive abilities, and the tests did not have a high enough ceiling to measure my strengths. What this meant is that I would score as high as possible in tests measuring math and quantitative reasoning, but then I would "only" score around the 90th percentile on verbal sections, so my composite score would put me at about the 98th percentile. I recently found out I'm on the autistic spectrum, and this sort of profile of strengths and weaknesses is apparently the norm with people like me.
Upon being given several other tests by the psychologist, I found out that even though my verbal ability is now at about the 97% percentile (I've improved as an adult), my quantitative/logical/pattern abilities are much higher, as high as the typical person with an IQ of 150-160 (SD 15), so about the 99.99th percentile.
Are you saying that you didn't even get a properly administered IQ test?
You said "as high as the typical person with an IQ of 150 to 160."
I took the GREs and they were very easy. I also took the LSAT and got a 175. I did my BS and MS at Berkeley in engineering and attended law school. I work at a top IP firm.
However, I would NEVER use those percentiles or attributes to say that I have a certain IQ, much less claim to be a "genius" (I mean come on, that sounds pretty pathetic in and of itself).
If you didn't get a properly administer IQ test then your pdoc is likely blowing smoke up your ass.
And even if you did get one, so what? My brother was tested and scored an actual (not "equivalent" like you) IQ of 156. He is a slob, can't land a woman, and has a horrible personality. He's no genius!
So you DIDN'T get a proper IQ test.
You got an equivalency based on percentiles from other tests from a doctor?
You don't have an actual IQ result idiot.
Ltcg wrote:
unrecognized wrote:I said that someone who doesn't recognize all the names I listed would not understand what it's like to be me. That does not mean that someone who does recognize all those names does understand what it's like to be me. An analogy would be like how someone who can't multiply cannot do advanced calculus, but that doesn't mean everyone who can multiply can do advanced calculus.
I have to think you and everyone else still replying are trolling, but the quality of posters on LR makes it hard to tell sometimes.
You really are not very bright. You were given a second bite at the apple and you choked. How stupid are you? Somebody could understand what it is like to be you and have never been exposed to one or more of the names you listed, just as someone with an IQ lower than you might speak Chinese well when you cannot. This is an epic fail on your part. You should be humble because you do not reason well.
Hahahaha. OP cannot even understand logic. OP has been trolling. He is average in intelligence.
Maybe the doctor was just trying to cheer him up after telling him he is retarded?
Sorry I don't know what you're supposed to refer to retards as these day.
Logical puppy wrote:
Maybe the doctor was just trying to cheer him up after telling him he is retarded?
Sorry I don't know what you're supposed to refer to retards as these day.
Lol nobody can understand OP's "genius" because he is slurring his words on the short bus. We call them spregs.
Edit: just checked. My LSAT was 165, not 175. Memories fade. The rest is still all true, though. I'm wicked smart.
unrecognized wrote:
Part of that is because on standardized tests I always scored at about the 98th national percentile. What I didn't realize is that I scored at the 98th percentile because I have a mismatch in cognitive abilities, and the tests did not have a high enough ceiling to measure my strengths. What this meant is that I would score as high as possible in tests measuring math and quantitative reasoning, but then I would "only" score around the 90th percentile on verbal sections, so my composite score would put me at about the 98th percentile. I recently found out I'm on the autistic spectrum, and this sort of profile of strengths and weaknesses is apparently the norm with people like me.
Upon being given several other tests by the psychologist, I found out that even though my verbal ability is now at about the 97% percentile (I've improved as an adult), my quantitative/logical/pattern abilities are much higher, as high as the typical person with an IQ of 150-160 (SD 15), so about the 99.99th percentile.
Are you saying that you didn't even get a properly administered IQ test?
You said "as high as the typical person with an IQ of 150 to 160."
I took the GREs and they were very easy. I also took the LSAT and got a 175. I did my BS and MS at Berkeley in engineering and attended law school. I work at a top IP firm.
However, I would NEVER use those percentiles or attributes to say that I have a certain IQ, much less claim to be a "genius" (I mean come on, that sounds pretty pathetic in and of itself).
If you didn't get a properly administer IQ test then your pdoc is likely blowing smoke up your ass.
And even if you did get one, so what? My brother was tested and scored an actual (not "equivalent" like you) IQ of 156. He is a slob, can't land a woman, and has a horrible personality. He's no genius![/quote]
And another thing. I'm very disappointed in letsrun. I don't even run. Ironically, I suppose, I need a wheelchair to get around. I started this thread on letsrun because I heard from numerous sources that this board draws more genius posters than most other online communities. I don't see it. I thought I'd get some good advice but, instead, I'm stuck dealing with moorons. I hope you guys run better than you think. Out.
Maybe you are not recognized for being smart because you are a loser.
Ughhhh wrote:
Sorry bro I guess I would feel the same way if I found out I had Assburgers too.
Not McDonald's best seller
Why is this thread still going? Clearly, if you were a genius, you would have stopped responding pages ago.
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
Ughhhh wrote:Sorry bro I guess I would feel the same way if I found out I had Assburgers too.
Not McDonald's best seller
The poor genius is reporting everything that he can't understand.
Which is everything.
Sperg on!
I don't think you can appreciate how high my IQ is. It is incredibly powerful yet depressing to know that I am so much more intelligent than other people. You are a dimwit compared to me.
its really depressing being superior to everyone around you in terms of just general intelligence. I scored 140 on a few tests and I can't help but look down upon everybody at high school not for their moral values or character but how limited their ways of thinking are. I don't feel "woke" just isolated.
Megan Keith (14:43) DESTROYS Parker Valby's 5000 PB in Shanghai
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Official Suzhou Diamond League Discussion Thread (7-9 am ET+ Instant Reaction show at 9:05 am ET)
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
Article: Director of BU track and field, cross country steps down following abuse allegations