Terence Crutcher's hands went down before being shot. He's attempted gun violence against cops before & is ex-con.

Deplorable John wrote:

Chimpout in Charlotte wrote:

This is what BLM is protesting.

https://mobile.twitter.com/1989Misanthrope/status/779528100782698496/photo/1

I know you're just trolling with racism, but this is why BLM is protesting:

"in 2016 black Americans have been three times more likely than whites to die in interactions with police"

http://www.snopes.com/do-police-kill-more-whites-than-blacks/

Unfortunately we don't have the statistics on how much more often they resist arrest, refuse to listen to authority, carry a weapon, try to act "hard" etc.

Unfortunately for the blacks in America, it seems that they don't know how to act as anything other than the victim. They have every opportunity in America in 2016 to succeed, but many choose the path of the victim. They choose to automatically believe police are bad, the system is against them, the world is racist, etc. Anytime something like this gives them an excuse to riot and protest and play the poor poor blacks card, they flock to it. To them, they are doing the same as those in the 1960's did.

Deacon wrote:

The actual theme with these shootings isnt that any of these people were armed(just about all weren't). The theme has been the attempt at criminalizing the deceased in order to justify the killing. As if the criminal record of the victim in any way justifies the killing.

Hypothetically, if a cop pulls a young guy over and sees on his computer that the guy has 1000 prior offenses, all of them involving guns and violence against cops, should the cop be expected to act the same as if he pulls over an 80-yr-old lady who has no criminal history?

jamin wrote:

Deacon wrote:

The actual theme with these shootings isnt that any of these people were armed(just about all weren't). The theme has been the attempt at criminalizing the deceased in order to justify the killing. As if the criminal record of the victim in any way justifies the killing.

Hypothetically, if a cop pulls a young guy over and sees on his computer that the guy has 1000 prior offenses, all of them involving guns and violence against cops, should the cop be expected to act the same as if he pulls over an 80-yr-old lady who has no criminal history?

How would a cop see this information before identifying the individual? A license plate number identifies the car, not the person driving the car.

How would he see this? wrote:

jamin wrote:

Hypothetically, if a cop pulls a young guy over and sees on his computer that the guy has 1000 prior offenses, all of them involving guns and violence against cops, should the cop be expected to act the same as if he pulls over an 80-yr-old lady who has no criminal history?

How would a cop see this information before identifying the individual? A license plate number identifies the car, not the person driving the car.

There is no sense in attempting rational discussion with the loonie left.

No reason for a cop to be on guard just because the cop-hating criminal owns the car -- he might not be the one driving it at the time.

Crooked Hillary wrote:

How would he see this? wrote:

How would a cop see this information before identifying the individual? A license plate number identifies the car, not the person driving the car.

There is no sense in attempting rational discussion with the loonie left.

No reason for a cop to be on guard just because the cop-hating criminal owns the car -- he might not be the one driving it at the time.

Jamin did not make the argument that the cop should be on guard because the car was owned by a criminal. He made the argument that a cop should be on guard because the driver is a criminal. The former could be a valid argument. The latter is not.

500 murders already this year. Zero Black Lives Matter protests about this.

In 2016 Chicago has recorded more murders than New York and Los Angeles combined

http://econ.st/2cXqLS5

) econ.st/2cXqLS5

Peaceful protesting? Looting stores, attacking journalists, throwing rocks at passing cars, stealing sneakers, starting fires, smashing storefront windows, etc. Yet, the cuck MSM media continues to paint a false narrative. These are thugs and animals. Fuk BLM.

https://youtu.be/MDzsE5heUuA

Chimpout in Charlotte wrote:

Fuk BLM.

]

You left out a "C". You should have stayed in high school. Your rants would at least have a chance of being taken seriously by one or two people if they thought you weren't a ditch-digger.

I repeat...(from Deacon)

The actual theme with these shootings isnt that any of these people were armed(just about all weren't). The theme has been the attempt at criminalizing the deceased in order to justify the killing. As if the criminal record of the victim in any way justifies the killing.

If no one noticed, the cops lied about him reaching into the car seeing as how the window of the car was rolled completely up. If no one noticed, the reason crutchers arm went down was because he was tazed. How much sense would it make to reach for a potential weapon while still keeping your other arm raised?

Read more:

http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=7705091&page=4#ixzz4LJuTcvY1