Just Sayin, since I was, and I'm again, on the ground for following athletes in Kenya and Ethiopia, I well know there are, for the best athletes (national and international, according to their whereabouts), several blood tests, normally carried out by a task force of South Africa. For that reason, your idea that European, American or from Oceania athletes of top level can escape tests going to train during winter in Kenya or Ethiopia is a wrong opinion (but, of course, here in LR everybody has the mentality of Conspiracy, without knowing what really happens).
About Kenyan doping, I repeated several times how it was very easy to ride the "scoop" of "widespread" doping, using the disinformation that is at the base of the criticism.
The second report of Seppelt in ARD, for example, was something ridiculous, starting with the "mental impact" of one Kenyan's Death because of EPO (something that is only an opinion, because nobody had evidence of any connection between EPO and his Death. But this runner dying was not a Kenyan athlete : he never ran any Marathon faster than 2:27, was already old, and never was in top 20 in any doimestic competition on road. Practically, he was a farmer not trained, who went running as an amateur, and the "whitnesses" speaking in the report were not athletes, but of course normal people who received some money.
The consistency, and "scientific and fair approach" that there was in all the reports of Seppelt have the same validity of the famous experiment supported by WADA for looking if EPO works with Kenyans, taking as subjects "not athletes" running 9'20" in 3000m, and without specifying type of training before, during and after the experiment : NOTHING.
So, we need to be able to distinguish facts from opinions, nurtured because of media Attacks without any real correct point (such as the Attacks in English newspapers). And facts are :
1) There are not blood OOC tests in Kenya and Ethiopia
2) Any substance can be found in the urines only, so blood tests have effect for the Biological Passport only, or for discovering some strange value which put the athlete in a special list for being followed by WADA and IAAF antidoping in more specific way
3) There are frequent normal OOC test in Kenya for urine (and the Kenyan runners who were positive were caught in DOMESTIC OOC TESTS, or in tests after winning prizes in small marathons around the World)
4) The number of Kenyan and Ethiopian runners competing around the World and winning prizes is so wide (and full of second level athletes, for these Countries, who are considered elite in all the other Countries) that in any case, also with a well organized National Antidoping, it's not possible to carry out with them blood tests. So, practically, nothing changes : 95% of doped Kenyans took steroids, and for searching them blood tests are not effective.
5) Several times the task force of WADA comes in Kenya and Ethiopia, for blood tests with the best NOT LOCAL athletes, in order to have data enough for the Biological Passport. So, don't forget it's easy to escape from the controls only because they are in another Country.
6) Different case is the possibility to cover tests, like Lamine Diack and his gangster's Group did, for reason of money and opportunity of image before top Championships. This possibility (which I hope no longer available in the future) is not connected with the "technicality" of tests, so it's wrong to think that the antidoping tests are all a joke.
7) About the technicality of the tests, the conclusions of Ashenden and Parisotto on the long list that Seppelt gave them, are not "scientific" and don't consider too many factors that, I suppose, they don't know.
8) Doping is connected with training, if athletes want to look at their best performances possible. But all the scientists studying doping don't know anything about the effects of training, so their data about the Biological Passports are not significative, because not in connection with different training systems, including a lot of variables (volume, intensity, continuity, recovery, altitude, permanence in altitude, latitude (because the same altitude at different latitudes doesn't produce the same effects), individual attitude to respond or not at many factors, affinity between Hb and O2, and still many other factors).
This means that about Kenya it was created an atmosphere of suspicion that doesn't have any reason to exist. In this situation, AK has great responsibility, because at first denied the existence of doping (that instead was clear), and secondly, when was in the corner because the lack of a working Antidoping Agency, wanted to show that they did everything against doping, increasing in the World the wrong idea that all the best Kenyan runners normally used PEDs. This because nobody had the specific education for fighting the superficial conclusions of the ARD report in scientific way, instead going on the ground of "populism".
Final conclusion : people must have some more confidence in the best athletes, because the performances they do are absolutely "normal" with high talent and proper strategy, training and motivation, without using any substance for aiding their activity (legal or illegal).