Let's compare apple to apples....i.e. non-profit organization to non-profit organization. It does no good to compare Masback's compensation with a for-profit orgainzation executive's compensation.
Probably the most similar organization to USATF in the United States is Swimming USA. Both are 501c3 non-profit organizations and are the national governing body of their respective sports.
Comparison-2003:
USA Swimming vs USATF
Revenue:
$18,098,533 vs $11,763,592
Which includes Revenue received from United States Olympic Committee:
$0 vs $2,801,610
Expenses:
$16,439,551 vs $11,303,799
Assets:
$26,443,026 vs $3,610,928
Liabilities:
$8,003,885 vs $3,564,741
Number of medals won in Athens:
28 vs 25
Top Executive Total Compensation:
$284,495 (Chuck Wielgus) vs $413,143 (Craig Masback)
Looking at this comparision I would have to say that Masback's compensation is way out of line. He's had 7 years to turn the organization around and the only significant claim(s) he can/is making are: (1) a 120% increase in revenue (which sounds impressive until you look at the extremely small base the % is applied to) and (2) just this year they are out of debt for the first time in 8+ years (Masback claims to have inherited books that had USATF $3 million in the hole from his predecessor).
Meanwhile the sport (in the USA) has been battered and bloodied due to doping/drug coverups while he has been at the helm. His lawyer background has been the hallmark of his actions in the 7 years he's been in charge. Posturing, legal manuverings and political wrangling with the USOC and IAAF were all unneccessarily protracted and have lead to stagnation/minisucle porgress in all other areas of the sport.
Looking at the Long Distance Running division of USATF I see no significant progress in the past 7 years. This is not surprising because Masback does not have LDR on his priority radar. Never has, and probably never will. RunningUSA has been the bastard child of USATF and has not had Masback support almost from the get go. He saw RUSA as the marketing arm of USATF LDR and he beleives that it has been a failure (which it more or less has been). The RD of the most significant marathons/road races are now controlling RUSA and they are using it for their own purposes/gains.
Finally, I have to disagree with Garry Hill's letter from the editor in the Jan 2005 issue of T&F News. Hill states, " Having Masback & Roe set for additional (4 yr) terms at USATF is a big plus for the sport." This blatant ass kissing will be the reason why I'll let my subscription to TAFN expire once again. I recently re-subscribed to that rag after many years of not reading it. Hill's/TAFN's blatant blind eye approach to reporting the drug problem in T&F along with their cozy relationship with USATF is NOT good for the sport.
Lest anyone think that this me personally bashing Masback and Roe, it's not. I think both of them are decent guys who love T&F, but I think that they are not the ones who can take the sport out of the rut it is/has been in for many years.