Big Doping Announcement Coming Very Soon

well played!

Does Canada have athletes?[/quote]

Yes, but Americans call them sled dogs.[/quote]

dfkjjfklda wrote:

Fast Dude Runner 2 wrote:

Does Canada have athletes?

Yes, but Americans call them sled dogs.

POD

bah hahaha wrote:

well played!

Does Canada have athletes?

Yes, but Americans call them sled dogs.[/quote][/quote]

Canada?

Yes a can!

The only reason this tweet got any attention was that David Epstein retweeted it.

Can anyone find any connection this guy has to TF? Why does David Epstein follow him?

Does ol Brucey Jenner get a free pass on his doping?

ezrahallam wrote:

The only reason this tweet got any attention was that David Epstein retweeted it.

Can anyone find any connection this guy has to TF? Why does David Epstein follow him?

Perhaps Epstein retweeted it because he knows it's true?

Perhaps... wrote:

ezrahallam wrote:

The only reason this tweet got any attention was that David Epstein retweeted it.

Can anyone find any connection this guy has to TF? Why does David Epstein follow him?

Perhaps Epstein retweeted it because he knows it's true?

Yep, that adds quite a bit of credibility to the tweet. He's not going to retweet something with no substance behind it, contrary to what NOPers may say.

ezrahallam wrote:

The only reason this tweet got any attention was that David Epstein retweeted it.

Can anyone find any connection this guy has to TF? Why does David Epstein follow him?

I dunno, but even Ross Tucker from Science Of Sport has retweeted it and is playing the guessing game, a couple of his replies:

"Given that it's a British journalist saying "faith-shattering", I don't know if Wariner would do it. I'm leaning Paula."

"Because context is clear - I believe,based on everything over the last 2 weeks, that the revelation involves her"

Isn't It Obvious? wrote:

ezrahallam wrote:

The only reason this tweet got any attention was that David Epstein retweeted it.

Can anyone find any connection this guy has to TF? Why does David Epstein follow him?

I dunno, but even Ross Tucker from Science Of Sport has retweeted it and is playing the guessing game, a couple of his replies:

"Given that it's a British journalist saying "faith-shattering", I don't know if Wariner would do it. I'm leaning Paula."

"Because context is clear - I believe,based on everything over the last 2 weeks, that the revelation involves her"

Did Epstein take his retweet down? I can't find it now.

Whether this guy is credible or not, there's plenty rumbling about this from other sources as well. Obviously, it might not be that Paula is the 'big name' on the IAAF list, but, right now, it sure looks like it is.

I sure hope it's not Gatlin, that would destroy my faith for sure

Since he says "faith shattering", i'm going with Ryan Hall.

What if it's Lagat?

Oh that would be terrible.

nice!

also in the running for POD in my opinion

imagine if hall got busted for PEDs though, haha

Since he says "faith shattering", i'm going with Ryan Hall.[/quote]

It's going to be Paula. Can't wait. Doped up she was.

Nothing like watching a top athlete fall from grace for doping.

I agree, most of these goons are cheaters anyway, not big news anymore.

dkny64 wrote:

Anyway, we're now into day 14 of Paula's great twitter silence.

Yeah, gotta admit that doesn't look good...

bukta wrote:

Does ol Brucey Jenner get a free pass on his doping?

Yes he does. Because this is America and usatf protects dopers. Just like the others who got their wheaties box cover. You get a wheaties box cover and they'll cover for you too.

Nothing surprises me about usatf any more. Yeah, yeah I know it wasn't usatf then.

dfkjjfklda wrote:

Fast Dude Runner 2 wrote:

Does Canada have athletes?

Yes, but Americans call them sled dogs.

POD.