Farah and UK athletics set to leave Salazar post Beijing

Advised to leave the coach who ships Mo used books and magazines wherever Mo decides to train in the world. Mo won't leave Salazar. He will likely become a U.S. citizen and pull a Mobot on the UK.

can we stop posting dailymail links on this site? They're always completely untrustworthy and misleading. The title claims that Mo + UK athletics are going to leave Salazar, but then the article has NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of this. They make up titles for click bait, and fill an article with old information just to get website traffic.

getting old wrote:

can we stop posting dailymail links on this site? They're always completely untrustworthy and misleading. The title claims that Mo + UK athletics are going to leave Salazar, but then the article has NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of this. They make up titles for click bait, and fill an article with old information just to get website traffic.

Exactly.

Firstly, they would have written a separate full piece article for this story if they really knew, instead, the story is mixed in with 3 or 4 other sports related stories.

Secondly, it's Charles Sales.

Thirdly, no quotes, not even the usual bullshit "sources close to UK Athletics..." was used. At best, it's just a guess. Anyone on here could have written that.

Most of the commenters here are the daily mail type.

getting old wrote:

can we stop posting dailymail links on this site? They're always completely untrustworthy and misleading. The title claims that Mo + UK athletics are going to leave Salazar, but then the article has NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of this. They make up titles for click bait, and fill an article with old information just to get website traffic.

salazar and mo are using the"loopholes" of tues and allowable AA injections to win as practice by Belgium Chris Mertens......it looks like they will be indicted but will get off the hook as well by using the same arguments in arbitration....

http://cyclingtips.com.au/2015/04/van-avermaet-to-race-on-pending-belgian-cycling-federation-anti-doping-hearing-two-year-ban-sought/

Run_dope wrote:

salazar and mo are using the"loopholes" of tues and allowable AA injections to win as practice by Belgium Chris Mertens......it looks like they will be indicted but will get off the hook as well by using the same arguments in arbitration....

http://cyclingtips.com.au/2015/04/van-avermaet-to-race-on-pending-belgian-cycling-federation-anti-doping-hearing-two-year-ban-sought/

Greg Van Avermaet--Bicycler: "I'm innocent. I am clean and pure. I haven't done anything that was not allowed, so I'm not worried. Yes, I have been long with doctor Mertens, but I have not used any..."

LOL... the exact same defense as Farah. Just change doctor Mertens to Salazar/Brown.

Looks like Greg Van Avermaet got a bit of karma here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKWDjzRf_G4

That's how anti-doping should be done...

getting old wrote:

can we stop posting dailymail links on this site? They're always completely untrustworthy and misleading. The title claims that Mo + UK athletics are going to leave Salazar, but then the article has NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of this. They make up titles for click bait, and fill an article with old information just to get website traffic.

I agree. The truth hurts so badly.

The NOP has had one person, for a small period of time, on one TUE in the last 4-5 years. They have less athletes on their past and present team with athletic induced asthma than the USOC reported average. This has been proven to be factual and verified. Athletes must report these medications (it will show up in urine or blood), and the doping authorities are the only ones that can issue a TUE. No way around that. If the NOP lied about that, it could be shot down in a second by WADA or USADA. Not too mention that the NOPs biggest star was just reported as someone NOT on the IAAF "suspicion list."Of course, you are entitled to keep these rumors alive, as well as your psychotic Freud PR nonsense, but the facts and truth will prevail.Hopefully, the respected journalists like Mr Esptein won't be taken for a ride any longer and start to turn the questions on the lying monsters and psychopaths that have started this nonsense.

Run_dope wrote:

salazar and mo are using the"loopholes" of tues and allowable AA injections to win as practice by Belgium Chris Mertens......it looks like they will be indicted but will get off the hook as well by using the same arguments in arbitration....

http://cyclingtips.com.au/2015/04/van-avermaet-to-race-on-pending-belgian-cycling-federation-anti-doping-hearing-two-year-ban-sought/

another Sleazy apologist wrote:

getting old wrote:

can we stop posting dailymail links on this site? They're always completely untrustworthy and misleading. The title claims that Mo + UK athletics are going to leave Salazar, but then the article has NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of this. They make up titles for click bait, and fill an article with old information just to get website traffic.

I agree. The truth hurts so badly.

This isn't about whether or not Mo+NOP are dirty or clean. It's about the fact that Daily Mail makes false claims and blatantly lies. If you are too blind to see that this news source is not reputable, you're just as bad as the people who defend NOP to the death.

As far as sorts reporting goes they are actually very reputable, they are regular winners of journalism prizes in the area. This has nothing to do with their right wing little Englander front pages.

getting old wrote:

This isn't about whether or not Mo+NOP are dirty or clean. It's about the fact that Daily Mail makes false claims and blatantly lies.

Where are these "false claims and blatant lies"?

And please come back to us after the worlds when Sleazy has been kicked out.

Are you disputing the use of "tues" and injecting AA into the blood by NOP?

Please give me the links and facts that show otherwise?

[quote]getting old wrote:

[quote]another Sleazy apologist wrote:

It's about the fact that Daily Mail makes false claims and blatantly lies. If you are too blind to see that this news source is not reputable, quote]

Just like Yahoo sports. Most of what they write is made up. (see all the Kevin Love stories last winter)

Coe will be Coe and Salazar will be Salazar

My guess is Nike will be Nike too, so USADA is

all we have to save us.

The question to ask is who is behind recent leak of test data

and who really benefits.

TUE system is destroyed thanks to Nike lab

Athletics will be next if we don't stop this

dsrunner wrote:

The question to ask is who is behind recent leak of test data

and who really benefits.

Leaking peoples' test data is a violation of privacy. Whoever did this deserves to be in jail.

It's not just the commenters. The people who run this site are the Daily Mail type.

Run_dope wrote:

salazar and mo are using the"loopholes" of tues and allowable AA injections to win as practice by Belgium Chris Mertens......it looks like they will be indicted but will get off the hook as well by using the same arguments in arbitration....

http://cyclingtips.com.au/2015/04/van-avermaet-to-race-on-pending-belgian-cycling-federation-anti-doping-hearing-two-year-ban-sought/

Does Mo have a TUE?

...in fact, I don't think Rupp has used his TUE in over 2 years.

As of 2013, WADA had over 400 IAAF athletes with a TUE's, some of those are Olympic medalist whose career is beyond doping suspicion. TUEs aren't just an NOP thing, if you are going through cancer treatment, you need to file a TUE.

you're the liar wrote:

getting old wrote:

This isn't about whether or not Mo+NOP are dirty or clean. It's about the fact that Daily Mail makes false claims and blatantly lies.

Where are these "false claims and blatant lies"?

And please come back to us after the worlds when Sleazy has been kicked out.

You seriously must be a troll. The article is titled "Farah and UK athletics set to leave Salazar post Beijing". Now find me ONE sentence in the article that backs that up. All of the claims they make have no source. If they say UK athletics is splitting with Salazar, why don't they cite a spokesperson???

While you're at it, explain how the Daily Mail makes these claims IMMEDIATELY after UK Athletics found "no impropriety" on behalf of Mo.