If Alberto's statement hasn't convinced you of his innocence, you are either stupid or being willfully obtuse.

F'ing priceless wrote:

pop_pop! wrote:

The good news is someone is burning money for spam starters like this and their work is awful.

What a total joke! Pretending that, on this cesspool of a message board where it's standard practice to post anonymously, with multiple nics, all you want about anything with virtually no restrictions, an unregistered name equals a PR firm worker is f'ing priceless.

There's no good news here, just delusional folks who think it's all good when the mob on losers rant are attacking your target but it's got to be pr flacks when posts challenge your preconceived notions and biases.

LOL. A delusional Duck is off his rocker again.

It's easy to recognize all the PR firm workers since they haven't even read the documents. So as they have no clue about the facts they're just blathering about "Alberto's strong response", "Magness' false statements", "brojos' bad journalism", "Lrc must apologize", and so on. There's absolutely no substance in their posts. Due to these shills, Nike has lost even more credibility. I'll never buy a Nike product anymore.

They don't need a PR firm when idiots like you are swinging at ghosts. Its over man just deal with it. regular long time REGISTERED posters are switching sides, fast.

I'm a troll and I get pasted on the 'What's Hot' column!

Does anyone else think Alberto's response is highly reminiscent of Lance Armstrong's "People ask me what I'm on. I'm on my bike 6 hours a day." response before he was busted?

So what about Salazars response to coaching Slaney? There's too much documentation for him to refute that claim so he just pretends it doesn't exist I suppose.

How about him doling out prescription meds to his children and goucher? He admits it but writes it off as part of his obsession?

I also assume that it makes sense for him to believe Gatlin's story? How many of you believe that bullshit? I'd be willing to bet that not one poster here believes Gatlin, yet Salzar was so worried by it that he decided to conduct an experiment using his own children to make sure that it couldn't happen. Yes that makes sense. It couldn't possibly be that he was testing to see what amount would trigger an positive test. Yeah that seems likely.

"He was starving in some deep mystery, like a man who is sure what is true." Leonard Cohen

(Directed at both sides of this issue.)

ya..... wrote:

They don't need a PR firm when idiots like you are swinging at ghosts. Its over man just deal with it. regular long time REGISTERED posters are switching sides, fast.

Then why don't you post this using your long time REGISTERED name so it's more believable?

Alberto did dispel a lot of the suspicion that was reaching.

But he also clearly showed his knowledge of exogenous testosterone application and has Androgel.

Shoebacca wrote:

Alberto did dispel a lot of the suspicion that was reaching.

But he also clearly showed his knowledge of exogenous testosterone application and has Androgel.

That's true, but that doesn't mean he was doping his athletes. If you already believed he was doping his athletes, then that is more fuel for your fire. But in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't mean much.

OnTheFence wrote:

TurninTablez wrote:

Pfft... just another weak post by one of the Brojos' paid trolls.

Solid post. Put the sad part is that he's not getting paid. These sad dudes are doing the Brojos' work for free!

And many of them "are" the Brojos'.

EARTH to unregistered nic.

Your claim is false. Typical PR firm hacks crying because the can't shift public opinion they way they do with the gullible sheep who are the usual targets.

do you morons honestly believe anyone at nike cares enough to hire a PR firm to spam a message board? yikes.

That's true, but... wrote:

That's true, but that doesn't mean he was doping his athletes. If you already believed he was doping his athletes, then that is more fuel for your fire. But in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't mean much.

There are three definitions of doping.

1. IAAF sanctions an athlete/coach for a doping offense.

2. IAAF does not sanction an athlete/coach because the federation can be bought, or there's a TUE, or it's not a strong case.

3. The methods used are within the rules. (aka "never tested positive")

The rules are created to permit doping. Most of you haven't read them, but, Alberto has and so have I. The WADA rules permit doping, IAAF's rules permit IVs and LOTS of exogenous Testosterone and more. Nike's doping program is very likely completely within the rules and Alberto has executed it very well.

If the final outcome is more viewers understand how the system actually works and how much doping the system permits, vs. the widely misunderstood fantasy, then that would be great.

The bad thing about these accusations is that they are like being charged with sexual assault, sexual harassment, child molestation, or rape. Whether the charge is 100% completely false you can never un-ring that bell.

The rest of your life people will just remember the terrible accusation and figure that if you weren't found guilty "something" happened to bring about the charge.

zohan wrote:

The bad thing about these accusations is that they are like being charged with sexual assault, sexual harassment, child molestation, or rape. Whether the charge is 100% completely false you can never un-ring that bell.

The rest of your life people will just remember the terrible accusation and figure that if you weren't found guilty "something" happened to bring about the charge.

Nothing suspicious about Michael Jackson owning the Neverland Ranch and having children over for slumber parties.

nbskis wrote:

do you morons honestly believe anyone at nike cares enough to hire a PR firm to spam a message board? yikes.

Well, Alberto *did* ask for 117 I.P. addresses. It's not really a reach, is it?

so done wrote:

I'm so sick of how biased this site is...the brojo's and half the people that post here are absolutely ridiculous

Yes, quite so!

3:30

Hey, can I work for this pr firm? Seems like easy work.

In somewhat seriousness it appears to be only 3 workers from their obvious writing styles. Switch it up fellas, might make ya a touch more successfull