"Call me Caitlyn Jenner." Annie Leibovitz photos

KudzuRunner wrote:

"Jenner came to international attention when, while identifying as a man, she won the gold medal in the decathlon at the 1976 Summer Olympics held in Montreal."

Ah, no. We get to make history, but we don't get to rewrite history.

Here's the sentence as it should read:

"Jenner came to international attention when, as a man, he won the gold medal in the decathlon at the 1976 Summer Olympics held in Montreal."

Puh-leese.

--your crotchety neighborhood English professor

Imagine if Bruce had decided to "identify" as a woman back them. He (she?) would have killed it in the hepthalon!

The only reason I ever look through threads like this on LR is for the hilarious lunacy of this guy's tantrums!

______________________

Wow, you got me there!

But in all seriousness, if you disagree with me, why don't you actually engage with the terms of my argument rather than throw a bunch of knee jerk insults at me?

What I attempted to do in responding to the poster who was concerned about her/his friend's child is to give some brief data on how sex and gender are more complicated than they first seem, then to provide a rational explanation about why

some may people feel like they're born into the wrong body.

Is my position that some people aren't born with XX or XY chromosomes Marxist? Is it ideological?

Is my observation that human gender presentation is sometimes the exact opposite of the presentation we observe in most other animals ideological? Marxist?

If you want to know my ideological stance, it is this: Nobody can claim to speak for God, and those that do--especially those who oppress others in the name of God--are really trying to defend and promote their own narrow interests, not protect society against degeneracy.[/quote]

The only reason I ever look through threads like this on LR is for the hilarious lunacy of this guy's tantrums!

______________________

Wow, you got me there!

But in all seriousness, if you disagree with me, why don't you actually engage with the terms of my argument rather than throw a bunch of knee jerk insults at me?

What I attempted to do in responding to the poster who was concerned about her/his friend's child is to give some brief data on how sex and gender are more complicated than they first seem, then to provide a rational explanation about why

some may people feel like they're born into the wrong body.

Is my position that some people aren't born with XX or XY chromosomes Marxist? Is it ideological?

Is my observation that human gender presentation is sometimes the exact opposite of the presentation we observe in most other animals ideological? Marxist?

If you want to know my ideological stance, it is this: Nobody can claim to speak for God, and those that do--especially those who oppress others in the name of God--are really trying to defend and promote their own narrow interests, not protect society against degeneracy.[/quote]

Fjfnnfnfnfnffnfn wrote:

Hurts to lose to a girl dont it?

Not when the girl has bigger balls and outweighs me by 40 pounds.

I'll continue to ask this..

What % of the genes that define "gender" are telling Bruce, or anyone, that they are the opposite of their physical gender? 0.1%? 1%?

Can't be higher than that, he is clearly a male.

So, why side with a few effed up genes rather than accepting your true gender? Why not tryt to fix yourself, Bruce, by psychotherapy or other treatment rather than siding with the faulty gene and growing fake knockers? It makes no sense.

You might have one faulty gene. ONE!!!! And thousands of properly functioning ones defining you as male. Again, why side with the one?

If you had 100 friends advising you not to jump off a cliff and one advising you to jump... Who do you listen to? FFS, Bruce! Wake up!!!

Dwight Phillips @Dwightdagreat · 5 h

It's non of my business but..This is ridiculous. We have to draw the line somewhere, certain things should be taboo.

As a rule, great civilizations/empires in history have not been conquered by external enemies but have rotted away internally.

I would think that even the most self-absorbed nihilist could see the depravity of this spectacle.

Charles Marlow wrote:

As a rule, great civilizations/empires in history have not been conquered by external enemies but have rotted away internally.

I would think that even the most self-absorbed nihilist could see the depravity of this spectacle.

You are retarded.

I guess Phillips doesn't have ties to track and field anymore and doesn't want any. If he was he would stay silent or tweet out go 4 it Caitland!!!!

Look, we all know that LGBT are all mental disorders.

They're all mentally messed up and people are cheering them on . . . makes me sick.

This board is too PC! wrote:

I guess Phillips doesn't have ties to track and field anymore and doesn't want any. If he was he would stay silent or tweet out go 4 it Caitland!!!!

I think he's coaching some long jumpers?

BTW, he predicted 3:51 for Centro...

Average distance runner wrote:

Fjfnnfnfnfnffnfn wrote:

Hurts to lose to a girl dont it?

Not when the girl has bigger balls and outweighs me by 40 pounds.

"Sexual identity is impossible," says Sontag; however, according to Tilton[1] , it is not so much sexual identity that is impossible, but rather the fatal flaw, and some would say the dialectic, of sexual identity. It could be said that precapitalist feminism suggests that narrative must come from the collective unconscious. Lyotard promotes the use of Sontagist camp to attack capitalism.

In a sense, Bataille's model of precapitalist feminism states that society has intrinsic meaning. Marx suggests the use of dialectic postmodernist theory to analyse and modify sexual identity.

[...]

"Sexual identity is fundamentally elitist," says Bataille; however, according to de Selby[5] , it is not so much sexual identity that is fundamentally elitist, but rather the failure, and some would say the genre, of sexual identity. Thus, Debord uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of concensus' to denote the collapse, and therefore the rubicon, of prematerial sexual identity. The subject is interpolated into a precapitalist feminism that includes sexuality as a whole.

[...]

however, according to Dahmus[8] , it is not so much sexual identity that is unattainable, but rather the fatal flaw, and eventually the dialectic, of sexual identity.

You guys should ask yourselves what is true source of your hate.

You are obviously attracted to Caitlyn.

Just like we all know why white guys are jealous/intimidated/hateful of black guys.

You are scared they will steal your woman.

you're all in love wrote:

You guys should ask yourselves what is true source of your hate.

You are obviously attracted to Caitlyn.

Just like we all know why white guys are jealous/intimidated/hateful of black guys.

You are scared they will steal your woman.

Yes but what is she look like without makeups? Yes? Hmmmm beware strange women of smoothas oil

Tony_Tangent_Tanser wrote:

you're all in love wrote:

You guys should ask yourselves what is true source of your hate.

You are obviously attracted to Caitlyn.

Just like we all know why white guys are jealous/intimidated/hateful of black guys.

You are scared they will steal your woman.

Yes but what is she look like without makeups? Yes? Hmmmm beware strange women of smoothas oil

ROFL . . . ya'll know you'd hit it! The angrier you are, the more you want to!

It's ok, this is a safe place. We already had one guy admit he has tiny balls. the rest of you need to step up!

If you asked yourself secretly if you'd hit it - regardless of your answer - then that is a WOMAN. Otherwise, you is GAY!

True story.

you're all in love wrote:

We already had one guy admit he has tiny balls.

Au contraire. Caitlyn had the largest set recorded in '76.

Perspective.

This is the kind of thing all civilizations evolve into. Rich, weak, effete people alienated from nature so severely that they can acquire a world view only from each other and from the polluted concrete void they call home.

In the end they degenerate into a death spiral of powdered frippery, and the strong, hardy barbarians overpower them and put them out of their misery.

It has been proven repeatedly for thousands of years. It will happen again. America and Europe are on the brink.