Wtfunny wrote:
The article says nothing about running down a wolf.
I never said it did. That is why I went on to prove that a human can, in fact, run on surfaces where a wolf cannot. That proves my original comment that persistence hunting of wolves is, in fact, possible.
But since your panties are still twisted up about that, I will insult you some more, as I warned you, you degenerate leech, while providing even more educational information for better readers than you.
Skiing was invented for persistence hunting, as most people of Nordic descent know. Moving quickly across deep snow can exhaust any animal that can't run on top, including bears and wolves, you corpse-festering worm. These hunters carried spears up until last century. Wolves were persistence-hunted by skiers who would pursue them all day, and sometimes for several days by relays of skiers.
Indians didn't happen to have skis, you insufferable snot. So they did their persistence hunting with snowshoes. E.g. page 112 of
http://books.google.com/books?id=OWElBYgbH60C&pg=PA294&lpg=PA294&dq=The+North+American+Indian.+Volume+13+-+The+Hupa.+The+Yurok.+The+Karok&source=bl&ots=P1B6shy1MT&sig=4zbU3rS_BIamwhIlqrDIH7awvX0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TU_kUrDsDoi9oQSzpYKIAQ&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=The%20North%20American%20Indian.%20Volume%2013%20-%20The%20Hupa.%20The%20Yurok.%20The%20Karok&f=falseNow, turdling, you know persistence hunting of wolves in snow exists, you know persistence hunting in snowshoes exists, and you know snowshoes can run on deeper snow than wolves can, so persistence hunting of wolves on snowshoes is possible. Go ahead, point out that I haven't provided a specific example. I enjoy making you look stupid so I'm saving that for next time. Or you could admit to yourself that there is surely one out there and I'm bound to find it if I hunt persistently, and spare yourself any further shame.