The Animal Within wrote:
You must work for the USATF.
It has been better, checkout the top Americans in the early 80's at major marathons. Depth is just not what it used to be.
Next look at the decline of club cross country after the USATF split the club nats and world trials. Then look at the decline of xc on a national and world scale.
Next look at participation numbers and competitive depth in the junior college level. Then look at the reduction of track & field programs in the NCAA.
Yup. Never better! Maybe for mud runs but not the sport.
Don't say track if you mean distance running.
Last 2 international championships, mid-distance medals men/women combined:
USA 5
Kenya 4
USA London Olympic medal count second highest since 1956 in non-hosted games
98 medals in last 4 world championships--never happened before
London DL sells 80,000 seats in 4.5 hours after Bolt announces
Track and Field #2 most popular high school sport for boys and #1 most popular for girls
New Canadian National Track League (no long distance)
New American Track League (no long distance)
Wait to get Allyson Felix autograph at Arcadia Invitational: 2 hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distance running fans have a problem: The athletes are slow compared to sprinters, hurdlers, and jumpers; Events are boring; DL 10000 meters canceled because sponsors didn't want to pay for it because nobody wanted to watch it.
France media feed for Paris DL cut away from 5000m event to show sprinters on the warmup track.
Unless long distance promoters can show the sport of distance running (not track and field) has a place in the era of team sports, it seems destined to hobby jogger territory, to compete with things like crossfit to get friends/neighbors attention. But that's not track and field