Thanks, but that author confuses credit with debt. They are related, but not necessarily equal.
Thanks, but that author confuses credit with debt. They are related, but not necessarily equal.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-09/it-took-10-new-debt-create-1-growth-first-quarter
Oh, the irony!
And oh the fantasy of your beliefs....
What are his beliefs?
Commodities headed toward bull market.
Lemons wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:Can you say Macy's, Aeropostale, JC Penny, Sears, Dillard's, REI, Dick's, Sports Authority, Nordstrom, Staples, Office Depot.....?
More cherry picking.
You apparently do not understand the concept of cherry picking.
Not rilly wrote:
Lemons wrote:More cherry picking.
You apparently do not understand the concept of cherry picking.
"Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position."
In other words, what Igy did/does.
Lemons wrote:
Not rilly wrote:You apparently do not understand the concept of cherry picking.
"Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position."
In other words, what Igy did/does.
"while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position."
How does the extensive list provided by Ghost do this? Can you provide a list of "a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position". ?
Not rilly wrote:
Lemons wrote:"Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position."
In other words, what Igy did/does.
"while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position."
How does the extensive list provided by Ghost do this? Can you provide a list of "a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position". ?
Easy.
http://www.greenandredmarket.com/menu/yeartodategainers.htmLemons wrote:
Not rilly wrote:"while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position."
How does the extensive list provided by Ghost do this? Can you provide a list of "a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position". ?
Easy.
http://www.greenandredmarket.com/menu/yeartodategainers.htm
Well ok then.
Lemons wrote:
Not rilly wrote:"while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position."
How does the extensive list provided by Ghost do this? Can you provide a list of "a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position". ?
Easy.
http://www.greenandredmarket.com/menu/yeartodategainers.htm
You do realize that now you are doing the same thing you called cherry-picking when Ghost did it?
Not rilly wrote:
Lemons wrote:Easy.
http://www.greenandredmarket.com/menu/yeartodategainers.htmYou do realize that now you are doing the same thing you called cherry-picking when Ghost did it?
First, I posted that at your request.
Second, I am not suppressing evidence since Igy had already posted his cherry picked data.
I get it.
Ghost posts his data -- and it is cherry picked.
You post your data -- and it isn't cherry picked,
I am a little unclear on this: "...I am not suppressing evidence since Igy had already posted his cherry picked data." This seems to imply that Igy suppressed evidence and thus his data is cherry picking.
Can you explain to me how he suppressed evidence? I don't get that
Not rilly wrote:
I get it.
Ghost posts his data -- and it is cherry picked.
You post your data -- and it isn't cherry picked,
I am a little unclear on this: "...I am not suppressing evidence since Igy had already posted his cherry picked data." This seems to imply that Igy suppressed evidence and thus his data is cherry picking.
Can you explain to me how he suppressed evidence? I don't get that
Sure. It's quite simple really. Igy posted a bunch of losers to try to make a point. But he ignored (suppressed) the many winners. That is cherry picking.
If you want other examples from this thread, read some of the posts by K5 or one of his many aliases. He routinely cherry picks data about Jews to support his hateful position.
Good day.
Lemons,
I trust you are not implying I am K5 or one of his many aliases.
Igy
Article suggests that negative real interest rates are not as uncommon as many think
agip,
Hope you are enjoying some great track and field at the NCAA meet.
In regards to the article, I find the comment comparing checking account fees to negative interest rates a stretch.
Hope you had a weekend of running. I had to scale back my Saturday after good training mid-week.
Igy
idiot investor wrote:
What are his beliefs?
bump
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Lemons,
I trust you are not implying I am K5 or one of his many aliases.
Igy
If the shoe fits...
Prince of Fools,
No, your and Lemons' apparent slander misplaced.
Igy