Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Then you will lose money over the next year on that trade.
DGTD Contrarian Indicator alert wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Then you will lose money over the next year on that trade.
Sounds like a BUY signal!
DGTD Contrarian Indicator alert wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Then you will lose money over the next year on that trade.
Sounds like a BUY signal!
seattle prattle wrote:
Racket wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
I honestly am in disbelief at today's action: the turn around, and a drastic one.
Wish i could claim to be smarter than i am, but ended up selling for a loss a couple of the trades i made yesterday but held onto most of them, luckily. It all averages out...
The fact that the market rebounded today might be a good sign.
This is like the fourth rebound in a month. Not really that surprising. In fact we've come back from worse. We had a -770 point loss at like 11:30am a couple of weeks ago that got reversed in about an hour. Welcome to algo trading
Yeah, I know, and I've been wrong before but i've been buying TNA, TQQQ (triple leveraged Nasdaq ETF), and AMZN all week.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
DGTD Contrarian Indicator alert wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Then you will lose money over the next year on that trade.
Sounds like a BUY signal!
Yes just like CHK, FB and TNA. Oh, you can add AMZN to today’s list.
seattle prattle wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Better keep a short leash.
Those aren't the kind of stocks that work on a short leash, esp. in this kind of volatility.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
purple martin wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-26/worst-yet-come-next-year
Why not just re-post similar headlines from 2010 - 2016.
Yes, I know what you mean, like this from last year:
http://online.wsj.com/public/r...ecasts.pdf
purple martin wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
purple martin wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-26/worst-yet-come-next-year
Why not just re-post similar headlines from 2010 - 2016.
Yes, I know what you mean, like this from last year:
http://online.wsj.com/public/r...ecasts.pdf
Yeah, I guess one out of eight years isn't bad.
Ura Loser wrote:
More projection.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
http://news.morningstar.com/fund-category-returns/
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Not true at all. The five year average of global stocks underperforming long term bonds by almost a percentage point. And we haven’t even had a bear market....yet.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Ura Loser wrote:
More projection.
No you are the loser:
https://realinvestmentadvice.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/1-my-tweet.png
seattle prattle wrote:
Igy, it's hard to take your claims seriously.
You make a claim that "the next year will take you back eight years."
Then to prove it you post a chart of the SNP 500 that purports to show how long various downturns took to recover to the previous highs. Well, okay.....
But no where does it show a one year period in which 8 years of previous gains were wiped out.
Don't get me wrong. If that were true and based on historical precedent, i would like to be aware of it. But it is simply not borne out by the data. In fact, by all appearances, the downturns have very closely mirrored the previous years uptrends, such that one year of losses would wipe out only approximately one year of gains. Yes, there are some brief stretches of a few months in which the loss excelerates, but if you look at most any 12 month period, it is equal in magnitude to one 12 month period of previous gains.
I find your claims to be not fully supported. I know, I know, ... I'll find out. I'm just saying, if you are going to attempt to assert your wild claims with data, one would think that the data would at least do that- support your claim. All it does is sensationalize normal market trends with the apparent purpose of inciting panic.