seattle prattle wrote:
I think you're on to something there - the short term trade is how to play this market. The part that gives me a royal smack down is when i try to take long term positions, because just as soon as i do, the market starts going in the opposite direction and rather significantly, and i end up bailing for a small loss (again....).
CPI is neutral. Calling it now, Fed will chicken out and not hike rates in December
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Racket wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Ah, but even Trump Tweets won’t matter since the global economy has peaked this cycle. Even the central banks can’t organize a successful stick save. So Hussman and the shorts likely have the upper hand.
They're losing effectiveness but market makers have trained people to buy the dip really well. We're range bound between SPY 260 and 280 until a big catalyst. Rate hikes? War with China? Tune in for today's episode of Deal Or No Deal : Global Economic Doom Edition!
Perhaps. It appears to me the buy on the dip has been a bad trade, maybe even a dead trade. Anyway, if not over the short run, it is bound to be a dead trade soon. These traders jerking the market have never been through a Bear Market. Even they will get killed at some point. Algo writers and traders will be the first to be fired when this up-cycle ends.
Only one of eight indexes on our world watch list have posted gains through Monday, December 10, 2018. The top performer this year is India's BSE SENSEX with a gain of 3.39%. In second is our own S&P 500 with a loss of 1.34%. In third is Tokyo's Nikkei 225 with a loss of 6.79%. Coming in last is Shanghai's SSE with a loss of 21.85%.
https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2018/12/10/world-markets-update?&bt_ee=B7GHZHTGslGjFDAeO3MDHV9eQanGg7TvAMoA8IMgCO86O%2BLKs2XnI8M9L5cPBhAr&bt_ts=1544622715459
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
These traders jerking the market have never been through a Bear Market. Even they will get killed at some point.
Uncle Sam wrote:
agip wrote:
Reesky stuff wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
80% of my liquid net worth is in a CD ladder.
Pretty risky is you are going out several years.
You will take a beating if interest rates rise a lot.
Remember that CD ladders are losers every day - they pay less than inflation. So obviously that's one risk.
The other risk is opportunity loss but I'm sure Iggy is comfortable with that.
but rates rising are ok on a short ladder like that one - not much of a risk.
I'd opt for an online bank account instead - you can get 2%, totally liquid and they will adjust the rate as the market changes.
Why lock up your money at all? Unless the CD rates are better than 2% I suppose.
FDIC issues also come into play.
Treasuries are better than CDs. They pay more and don’t have the same tax issues. Why aren’t you financial advisors recommending that route?
kommon senz wrote:
[quote]agip wrote:
1. Remember that CD ladders are losers every day - they pay less than inflation. So obviously that's one risk.
Not really. Current one year CDs paying @ 2.75% while inflation is 2.50%. And yes, 2.75% is > 2.50%
2. The other risk is opportunity loss but I'm sure Iggy is comfortable with that.
That can be said of any investment. Money tied up in one investment cannot be invested elsewhere.
3. but rates rising are ok on a short ladder like that one - not much of a risk.
Yes, Iggy has a very short term ladder so little risk
4.I'd opt for an online bank account instead - you can get 2%, totally liquid and they will adjust the rate as the market changes. Why lock up your money at all? Unless the CD rates are better than 2% I suppose.
I am unfamiliar with what online bank accounts are paying but as to CDs, one month is just above 2%, 1 year @ 2.75%
Brady Tom wrote:
Stanley Morgan wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Good summary of current market risk to the downside:
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4227407-another-50-percent-correction-possible?lift_email_rec=false
Interesting.
While we have been carrying a much higher weighting in cash over the last several months, we also still have a healthy dose of equity related investments.
Why? Because the longer-term trends still remain bullish as shown below.
Go, Pats!
Short term trend down.
Go Dolphins!
Now Lowes is announcing a big stock buy back to gloss over the fact they're closing a bunch of stores and housing sales are dropping. I'm actually now convinced that 50% of current stock valuation is literally just companies doing buybacks
People who were around in 2007 : were companies pulling this sh!t then too?
Once again we see an inverse relationship between the direction of the market and the volume of posts on this thread.
What do you expect, trading the market is no longer fun or profitable.
Go, Fats!
Brady Tom wrote:
What do you expect, trading the market is no longer fun or profitable.
Go, Fats!
So what is your year-to date performance?
BradyTom wrote:
So what is your year-to date performance?
Mouth Breather wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
I think you're on to something there - the short term trade is how to play this market. The part that gives me a royal smack down is when i try to take long term positions, because just as soon as i do, the market starts going in the opposite direction and rather significantly, and i end up bailing for a small loss (again....).
Why bail? Just hold on and it will go back up. It always does.
Knot4U wrote:
BradyTom wrote:
So what is your year-to date performance?
Not great, but better than yours.
Brady Tom wrote:
Knot4U wrote:
BradyTom wrote:
So what is your year-to date performance?
Not great, but better than yours.
I am up 4.5% on the year, so if you are doing better than that, great!
Go, Fats!
Slovakian CD ladder.....
