good thing mr. obama didn't take her guns away! that, kiddos, is why we have the second amendment :)
Get over the lie that Obama is doing anything that would prevent this woman from doing what she did.
Wow Unbelievable wrote:
Get over the lie that Obama is doing anything that would prevent this woman from doing what she did.
Hopefully that guy was being sarcastic. It's hard to believe that anyone stupid enough to think the government wants to take our guns away could actually operate a computer.
Ok. Let shotguns be legal. Ban everything else.
What gets me is that, according to the story, the man had five felony convictions. Why is a guy like that not in prison forever?
runn wrote:
Wow Unbelievable wrote:Get over the lie that Obama is doing anything that would prevent this woman from doing what she did.
Hopefully that guy was being sarcastic. It's hard to believe that anyone stupid enough to think the government wants to take our guns away could actually operate a computer.
You haven't turn on the tv, read a newspaper, listened to the radio,
or been on the Internet in the last 8 months have you?
Welcome back to the Internet. LRC is still full of idiots,
as usual. The post above is proof.
self'd
reading 101 wrote:
runn wrote:Hopefully that guy was being sarcastic. It's hard to believe that anyone stupid enough to think the government wants to take our guns away could actually operate a computer.
You haven't turn on the tv, read a newspaper, listened to the radio,
or been on the Internet in the last 8 months have you?
Welcome back to the Internet. LRC is still full of idiots,
as usual. The post above is proof.
What was the proposed law that would have prevented this woman from having this gun?
Now there was a proposed law that would make it increasingly difficult for that attacker with the felonies to get a gun.
But Obama opponents want him to easily obtain weapons and ammo.
reading 101 wrote:
Welcome back to the Internet. LRC is still full of idiots,
as usual. The post above is proof.
Weren't you the one who thought that there was no information about the Earth's climate prior to the 19th Century?
So, the date on the video is Oct. 2008. How is this news?
L L wrote:
What was the proposed law that would have prevented this woman from having this gun?
Now there was a proposed law that would make it increasingly difficult for that attacker with the felonies to get a gun.
But Obama opponents want him to easily obtain weapons and ammo.
At least the rapist didn't go to a gun show before the rapes. It would have been a gun fight. A 5-time felon CAN purchase a gun without any checks. That's what Obama wanted to stop. Your neighborhood thugs no longer need to illegally obtain guns. They are easier to purchase than a car!
Missouri is the pit of America. We should excavate the whole state, pave it over, and make it a huge skate park.
She's racist against whatever the race of the rapist is,
The story just shows how unnecessary assault rifles are. A twelve guage shot gun is the best weapon for home defense. One blast will generally stop any assailant. A wide dispersal of gun shot means that there is no problem trying to hit a target under pressure. Most of the time, burglars will flee just when they hear you pump a catridge into the barrel. And if you miss, the shot will not penetrate your walls and kill someone next door or walking down the street. Assault weapons are terrible for home defense. They are made and designed to kill at a distance on a battle field. They are also high performance weapons that require consistent maintenance and adjusting to be sure that they are ready for use. You can lock a way a shot gun for a year and it will be ready to go when you pull it out. Simple, affordable and effective.
F that wall of text. I'm not reading it. The more firepower, the better.
Precious Roy wrote:
The story just shows how unnecessary assault rifles are. A twelve guage shot gun is the best weapon for home defense. One blast will generally stop any assailant. A wide dispersal of gun shot means that there is no problem trying to hit a target under pressure. Most of the time, burglars will flee just when they hear you pump a catridge into the barrel. And if you miss, the shot will not penetrate your walls and kill someone next door or walking down the street. Assault weapons are terrible for home defense. They are made and designed to kill at a distance on a battle field. They are also high performance weapons that require consistent maintenance and adjusting to be sure that they are ready for use. You can lock a way a shot gun for a year and it will be ready to go when you pull it out. Simple, affordable and effective.
Your post suggests that you don't understand the 2nd Amendment. It doesn't say "...the right to keep and bear arms (deemed necessary by the central government for home defense) shall not be infringed." It says American citizens have a right to "bear arms." Period.
I agree with you that an AR-15 is not necessary for home defense. A shotgun is much more efficient, effective, and easier to use. A Mossberg 500 or the cheaper Maverick 88 ($200) or your granddad's old 12-gauge pump bird hunter are great home defense weapons. But it doesn't matter if an assault rifle is "necessary" for home defense. If a mentally stable American without a felony conviction wants to own an AR-15, he should be able to buy one. A nation of law abiding citizens armed with modern weapons are a check on an overly powerful central government.
good kush wrote:
good thing mr. obama didn't take her guns away! that, kiddos, is why we have the second amendment :)
"Buy a shotgun." -Vice President Joe Biden
You can quit the internet now.
Charlie Freak wrote:
A nation of law abiding citizens armed with modern weapons are a check on an overly powerful central government.
So you are saying I should be legally able to own a nuclear weapon?
So you are saying I should be legally able to own a nuclear weapon?
only if you are law abiding.