I haven't claimed that his status as a legend/non-legend is the truth. What I have claimed as truth is that he isn't a household name like Seb Coe, his Olympic "fame" is almost non-existent in the eyes of the British public, and that his race record isn't sufficient to be considered legendary. These are truths.
Those are facts, not hate.
If you want to quantify "legend" go ahead, I will quite happily argue, on any reasonable definition of the term, that Farah isn't a legend (without name-calling - let's see if you can do the same?).
A legend wouldn't run half a marathon (I would suggest that, had he stayed in the race and won it, there wouldn't even be a question).
It's strange how none of the people arguing the other side can come up with anything other than name-calling - I guess when you have no way to back up your argument, name-calling is all you have left?