george oscar bluth wrote:
26mi235 wrote:People were shouting about Lagat running 7:34; Rupp just bettered that time and beat the Silver medalist in the 5000m and all there is here is a bunch of complaint.
Probably because Lagat's 7:34 win by 4 seconds is more impressive than Rupp's 7:33 loss?
Maybe a little, unless you consider who rupp stomped in the race. It wasn't a 7:40 race that got fast at the end.
Lagat was impressive, but that doesn't mean rupps wasn't too.