Ritz: 12:56
Webb: 13:07 (13:10?) not sure.
Who will have a better 5k PR when all is said and done?
Ritz: 12:56
Webb: 13:07 (13:10?) not sure.
Who will have a better 5k PR when all is said and done?
Probably Ritz, just because I need Webb to prove it to me. I'm not sure if Salazar will be the best fit for him. But I could see Webb going real low 12:50 someday if he gets back on track. I don't think Ritz will run faster. I think Teg will drop a second or two, Jager will get down there, and German will crush them all.
I vote Webb
Colonel Forbin wrote:
Ritz: 12:56
Webb: 13:07 (13:10?) not sure.
Who will have a better 5k PR when all is said and done?
Webb for sure. Webb has the talent to go sub 12:50 and Salazar will make sure he stays focused. I say 12:48 for Webb and maybe 12:55-12:56 for Ritz.
None of you can answer this question with any degree of certainty, yet you still try. I'm not sure whether to admire that, or pity that.
I don't see Ritz improving upon his 5k time. So the question in my mind is will Webb break 12:56?
My vote is Webb will turn into a 5k / 1.5k runner this coming summer, with the next year focussing primarily on the 5k. At that time (two years from now) I see Webb running in the 12:50 range and Ritz only focussing on the 10k and breaking 27 next year.