not particularly
rough rule of thumb i use is that an equivalent women's performance is ~ 10% slower than a man's performance - meaning
100w = male wr
200w = male wr
400w = male wr
800w = 2s weaker than = male wr
1500w = 4s weaker than = male wr
3kw = male wr ( the 8'06 had poor 1k splts )
5kw = 18s weaker than = male wr
10k = 36s weaker than = male wr
Mw = 1'00 stronger than = male wr
for 53.5/1'57.5 - neither are wr calibre times for women let alone men - equivalence for man woud be ~ 48.6 / 1'46.8
you are comparing women's times directly with the mens without taking into account that women's 800 is still a coupla secs underdeveloped compared to men
your example of caballo is instructive
44.26/1'43.50wr at same meet ( former being low altitude wr )
add 10% to both & you get caballo's equivalent time for women as :
48.62 / 1'53.85 - times both a little slower than jarmila's clockings
i'd wager a 1'53.28 = ~ 1'43.00
& 1'57.5 = 1'46.8 for a man
just that women's 800 times are weak compared to men & the wr is probably = to about a 1'43-flat