So who all made their case for an at large this last weekend, and who all blew it? Any ideas on who is going to fill the field?
So who all made their case for an at large this last weekend, and who all blew it? Any ideas on who is going to fill the field?
we'll all know in about three hours
can't wait
From Mideast, I would figure both Carnegie Mellon and Dickinson get in on the men's side. On the women's side, Hopkins and E-Town, though maybe just Hopkins(would be hard with just a 3 pt. deficit). From the South, UTT will get in on the men's side.
Poker wrote:
From Mideast, I would figure both Carnegie Mellon and Dickinson get in on the men's side. On the women's side, Hopkins and E-Town, though maybe just Hopkins(would be hard with just a 3 pt. deficit). From the South, UTT will get in on the men's side.
hope dickinson makes it
if so, my friend grabbed the last individual spot
I predict in no particular order for men:
NCC
St. Johns
Platteville
Geneseo
Augustana
Carnegie Mellon
St. Lawrence
Colorado College
Carleton
UT Tyler
TCNJ
Anderson
Tufts
Heidelberg
Mt. Union
Dickinson
MW-5
S-3
ME-4
W-3
GL-5
NE-3
A-5
C-4
32 total
Look around the Nation - you can make a strong case that the Mideast region deserves 5 teams on the women's side. I can not imagine only one women's at-large bid for the Mideast.
I think Trinity and Bowdoin will be in instead of TCNJ and St Lawrence
Dude your an idiot, GL 5? your kidding right, Keene beat ST Laurence, you have to give NE 4 without a doubt but not 5 for NE either.
You can't take Geneseo if you don't take TCNJ...TCNJ beat Trinity at paul short
then geneseo will also not be going because tcnj came in third and geneseo in fourth and in case you did not know you cant take a team if you dont take another team that finished higher than them at regionals. does anyone have any thoughts on the south? do you think texas-tyler will have the entire team go? i know they are ranked and lost by only a point to a lower ranked emory team, but the south normally does not perform as great at nationals as other regions and their top 2 guys finished 1-2 and had a 1:45 spread till thier fifth guy. could it be possible they just send the two individuals who really make this team good because team spread is supposed to a determinant for who goes to nationals.
paul short isn't considered. It's only the last two meets of the season and regional finishing.
just remember also that rankings aren't supposed to be takin into account when deciding at large bids. Its all who beat who and how they beat them in the last part of the season.
Women:
Bowdin
Colby
Middlebury
Luther
N. Wes.
Wartburg
St. Thomas
St. Olaf
Wash. U
Wis. Eau-Claire
Wis. Platt.
Wis. LaCrosse
Wis. Oshkoh
Dickinson
Haveford
Johns Hopkins
Genesco
Plattsburgh
Ithaca
TCNJ
Cortland
Calvin
Case
De Pauw
Kenyon
Emory
Trinity
Willamette
Puget Sound
Colorado
Why did Mount Union's women not run at regionals? They placed 3rd at OAC's so it would seem they would be somewhat competitive at regionals...
where are the at-larges announced?
i am guessing its supposed to come out at 3
Rumor has it that Mount's girls team quit.
colorado will not make it.
who's in?? its 3
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
Article: Director of BU track and field, cross country steps down following abuse allegations
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
Official Suzhou Diamond League Discussion Thread (7-9 am ET+ Instant Reaction show at 9:05 am ET)