Look, I know most of you mean well, but it seems like you have no idea of the kind of budgetary balancing act that it takes to run a state university. The budget cuts that RU took from the state were enormous last year. As it was, they had comparatively little impact on academic affairs, which is the right approach in my book.
As a strategy, the course taken has merit. It is a belt tightening move and is unpopular in many quarters, but its not as though the AD and pres just got out a dart board and decided "let's cut mens crew!"
For better or worse, Rutgers has decided to promote football and b'ball at the expense of other sports. The president/board feels as though these sports have the best chance of keeping RU in the national spotlight and that is the most effective way to build donor support and improve the reputation of the university. (which is far undervauled).
Look, let's face it, if these nonrevenue sports had a strong donor base and could form a vocal constituency in the alumni then this move would be impossible. At a recent university senate meeting there was sympathy but little support for a group of parents and athletes who were trying to get a resolution passed to condemn the cuts. I'm sure they felt that it was apathy that led to a lack of support, but I think most people realized that we can't be everything to everybody - especially until the state legislature starts funding us in a fair way.
So for those of you out there who are looking at your schools and wondering if track and XC are next, they probably are. You would do well to organize whatever alumni you have, raise funds, and get active.
Finally, for the people spewingabout corruption at RU
- Recent audits of the books turned up very little in the way of wasteful spending/corruption. UMDNJ is a cesspool and most of that can be tied to political patronage in the Jim "I am a gay american" McGreevy's admin. I would put RU's books up against any major state shool and I'd be confident that they are cleaner than most.