Complete outrage against any misstep, indiscretion, or alleged wrongdoing by someone on the "left".
But 100% cheerleading for the orange lunatic (or him minions) facing endless legal, moral, and medical issues.
So, you complaints ring very hollow and I looked in to the Gay plagiarism claims, and its slicing the salami pretty thin.
Not a fan of Trump at all, but this is an idiotic post. The left lives their lives obsessing over Trump and anything slightly negative done by a Republican.
Do you not realize who started this thread? it wasn’t a leftard. It was a rightard.
It's to gloat of course. See this DEI hire? Look how terrible she is! Look! Look at the terrible DEI hire. See how right I am about everything? I am very smart
You are okay with frauds? You don't think the best person for the job should get the job?!?
I do believe the best person for the job should get the job. We may have slight differences in how we view "the best person for the job" though.
I do believe the best person for the job should get the job. We may have slight differences in how we view "the best person for the job" though.
But we both agree that a fraudulent academic would not be the best person for the job, yes?
Of teaching a class? I would say that you learn a lot from failure and can pass along those lessons to students. Her plagiarism wasn't like a moral failing. She just cited a few things incorrectly and used some common language that is iffy on whether or not it should have been cited. Its very minor stuff compared to someone like Neil Gorsuch who lifted whole passages verbatim without citation for a book he wrote. Do you think a fraudulent person should be a Supreme Court Justice?
Also, the class is called Reading and Research, not "How to cite things." Those are separate skills. So in summary, I don't really believe she's fraudulent. Just made a few small mistakes but did not at all copy someone else's work. A truly fraudulent person shouldn't be teaching any class anywhere because it's a moral failing.
But we both agree that a fraudulent academic would not be the best person for the job, yes?
Of teaching a class? I would say that you learn a lot from failure and can pass along those lessons to students. Her plagiarism wasn't like a moral failing. She just cited a few things incorrectly and used some common language that is iffy on whether or not it should have been cited. Its very minor stuff compared to someone like Neil Gorsuch who lifted whole passages verbatim without citation for a book he wrote. Do you think a fraudulent person should be a Supreme Court Justice?
Also, the class is called Reading and Research, not "How to cite things." Those are separate skills. So in summary, I don't really believe she's fraudulent. Just made a few small mistakes but did not at all copy someone else's work. A truly fraudulent person shouldn't be teaching any class anywhere because it's a moral failing.
To racists it doesn't matter if black women are qualified, they are discounted because white supremacists believe they are better just because others aren't.
Speaking of KJP, the White House has been trying to get rid of her for months but she just won't leave. And they can't fire her because... well, you know. LOL
Top aides to President Biden secretly hatched a plan this past fall to replace White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre by recruiting outside allies to nudge her out the door.
Without making it a daily personal task to Google her name every morning, how do you find this obscure stuff all time (I'll put aside for now questions as to why you care about it)? How do you come across the latest news on Claudine Gay and others of little significance? Is there a website/service that tracks such people? Do you have to register and pay?