They return the following 1600 / 3200 times:
4:21 / 9:33
4:23 / 9:35
4:31 / 9:58
4:32 / 10:25
Can they find a 5th runner? If so, they could podium at the CIF state meet, which I don’t believe they have ever done before.
They would have made podium last season if they had a 5th runner.
Lekae wrote:
They return the following 1600 / 3200 times:
4:21 / 9:33
4:23 / 9:35
4:31 / 9:58
4:32 / 10:25
Can they find a 5th runner? If so, they could podium at the CIF state meet, which I don’t believe they have ever done before.
They would have made podium last season if they had a 5th runner.
I mean, if they find a 5th man, they could podium in Division 4, which is the division they are in. This division is not nearly as strong as Division 1 (with teams such as Great Oak, Buchanan, ML King, Beckman, etc.)
this team has terrible endurance
in what world does a 4:31 convert to barely sub 10
happy1 wrote:
this team has terrible endurance
in what world does a 4:31 convert to barely sub 10
All 1600 PRs are from March 23.
All 3200 PRs but the 9:35 one are from March 9. the 9:35 one was from March 23
i might transfer. I'm a sub 10 sophomore within the league
non of there guys have raced a serious 3200 this season. Krueger ran 10:25 a week after coming back from month long injury; so did mcnee