High chance Khannouchi was doping. He was running in the late 90's, early 2000's when testing procedures weren't really that great. Off the grid in Morocco much of his training. Shady situation and he ran unbelievable times at the time.
Khalid was 100% obviously a doper.
Rupp is clean. And the best.
Well the Rupp/Sleazy Sal sycophant said so so I guess that case is closed.
I guess you missed the line from CAS stating, "no athletes were found to have ever gained any kind of advantage." Interpret that how you will.............
I missed that indeed. Are you sure CAS said that? I just searched their reasoned decision for "no athletes" and "any kind", and could not find that statement.
Just some points why "Rupp's career is questionable", in addition to being coached by a now finally banned drug cheat (who also coached banned drug cheat Slaney):
1) "testosterone medication" as teenager
2) "likely doping" according to IAAF
3) suspicious testo spike according to USADA
4) likely usage of a forbidden method according to USADA
5) unidentified drugs sent across the border in a hollowed book.
Geez this again hahaha. It's called Testoboost - walk down to your CVS and buy some. Report back and let us know if you start running 2:06.
If everyone "likely doping" is doping then the whole sport is doping. Which could be the case, I admit.
As to the CAS report and AlSal decision - that statement was definitely in there. It was their reasoning for banning exactly ZERO athletes.
I missed that indeed. Are you sure CAS said that? I just searched their reasoned decision for "no athletes" and "any kind", and could not find that statement.
Just some points why "Rupp's career is questionable", in addition to being coached by a now finally banned drug cheat (who also coached banned drug cheat Slaney):
1) "testosterone medication" as teenager
2) "likely doping" according to IAAF
3) suspicious testo spike according to USADA
4) likely usage of a forbidden method according to USADA
5) unidentified drugs sent across the border in a hollowed book.
Geez this again hahaha. It's called Testoboost - walk down to your CVS and buy some. Report back and let us know if you start running 2:06.
If everyone "likely doping" is doping then the whole sport is doping. Which could be the case, I admit.
As to the CAS report and AlSal decision - that statement was definitely in there. It was their reasoning for banning exactly ZERO athletes.
If “everyone” is likely doping, “everyone’s” coach would be banned for life and their accomplishments would have an implied asterisk after each race time.
Only one prominent coach was given the boot for life. It’s not a far stretch that his prized athlete is seen as shady.
Clean coaches don't try gray area stuff, they stay far away from even the hint of gray in the white. The weird experimenting tmeirh T cream and the stuff he had Steve do only gets done by someone trying to step 8btobtje gray.
Once you do that everything you do and everything you touch is dirty.
Geez this again hahaha. It's called Testoboost - walk down to your CVS and buy some. Report back and let us know if you start running 2:06.
If everyone "likely doping" is doping then the whole sport is doping. Which could be the case, I admit.
As to the CAS report and AlSal decision - that statement was definitely in there. It was their reasoning for banning exactly ZERO athletes.
It never was proven to be testoboost, but we have it in writing that is was testosterone medication. Testoboost is not a medication.
Likely doping: there were less than 20 likely dopers on that infamous 2016 list, but we know that 15-18% used in-competition blood doping at the 2011 and 2013 worlds. Check how many athletes were there... Ergo you are wrong: there are actually a lot more dopers than those few identified "likely dopers".
Finally, lol. Evidently you can't find that alleged CAS statement either. Nice one!
Geez this again hahaha. It's called Testoboost - walk down to your CVS and buy some. Report back and let us know if you start running 2:06.
If everyone "likely doping" is doping then the whole sport is doping. Which could be the case, I admit.
As to the CAS report and AlSal decision - that statement was definitely in there. It was their reasoning for banning exactly ZERO athletes.
It never was proven to be testoboost, but we have it in writing that is was testosterone medication. Testoboost is not a medication.
Likely doping: there were less than 20 likely dopers on that infamous 2016 list, but we know that 15-18% used in-competition blood doping at the 2011 and 2013 worlds. Check how many athletes were there... Ergo you are wrong: there are actually a lot more dopers than those few identified "likely dopers".
Finally, lol. Evidently you can't find that alleged CAS statement either. Nice one!
"In competition blood doping?" Do you seriously believe that from the AlSal camp? That's what you're insinuating.....
You've gone from vitamin drips (L-Carnitine) and testoboost to blood doping?!?!? I must admit this is a first.
Almost every human in the history of human beings has PB's slower than Bekele.
This is NOT a comparison to Kenenisa Bekele’s personal best times. Please try to be relevant in your next post.
I thought we were comparing Galen Rupp’s PB with Bekeje’s masters marathon time from London a few days ago? where in my post did I write “Bekele’s personal best times”?
"In competition blood doping?" Do you seriously believe that from the AlSal camp? That's what you're insinuating.....
You've gone from vitamin drips (L-Carnitine) and testoboost to blood doping?!?!? I must admit this is a first.
1) It's a published fact "that 15-18% used in-competition blood doping at the 2011 and 2013 worlds". Of course that's worldwide, not in the AlSal camp.
2) It was you who falsely claimed that "If everyone "likely doping" is doping then the whole sport is doping." I merely pointed out that a lot more people are doping than getting caught with such absurd ABP parameters and thus flagged "likely doping". Fact.
3) Suspecting blood doping for Rupp and Farah here in 2022 is not a first. Where have you been? See the IAAF list from 2016, where they were two of the just 17 "likely dopers" (blood dopers) worldwide.
4) Again with the testoboost. That was Salazar's unsubstantiated claim, not a fact. It was literally "testosterone medication".
"In competition blood doping?" Do you seriously believe that from the AlSal camp? That's what you're insinuating.....
You've gone from vitamin drips (L-Carnitine) and testoboost to blood doping?!?!? I must admit this is a first.
1) It's a published fact "that 15-18% used in-competition blood doping at the 2011 and 2013 worlds". Of course that's worldwide, not in the AlSal camp.
2) It was you who falsely claimed that "If everyone "likely doping" is doping then the whole sport is doping." I merely pointed out that a lot more people are doping than getting caught with such absurd ABP parameters and thus flagged "likely doping". Fact.
3) Suspecting blood doping for Rupp and Farah here in 2022 is not a first. Where have you been? See the IAAF list from 2016, where they were two of the just 17 "likely dopers" (blood dopers) worldwide.
4) Again with the testoboost. That was Salazar's unsubstantiated claim, not a fact. It was literally "testosterone medication".
1) I agree. In fact probably more like 25-30% in actuality
2) Not sure if you're what you're really saying here, I think I agree.
3) Of course Doorbell Mo looks very shady, you seem to be associating Galen by association? If the most tested athlete in the history of T&F (Galen - one year it was literally 200+ tests), and also an athlete whose coach and team went through the most extensive investigation in the history of T&F (5+ years and tens of millions spent) that determined "no athletes gained any advantage," and resulted in ZERO athletes being banned..........if that athlete is doping (Galen), God help us all. Why are you even watching?
"Round and round" wrote "Bekele," not "Bekele's." That refers to Bekele's London time, not to his PB. The grammar is conceivably misinterpretable, but it's not technically ambiguous. "Hane" is wrong. It would be easier to forgive the understandable error if "Hane" wasn't so insulting while compounding it.
"Round and round" wrote "Bekele," not "Bekele's." That refers to Bekele's London time, not to his PB. The grammar is conceivably misinterpretable, but it's not technically ambiguous. "Hane" is wrong. It would be easier to forgive the understandable error if "Hane" wasn't so insulting while compounding it.
"Round and round" wrote "Bekele," not "Bekele's." That refers to Bekele's London time, not to his PB. The grammar is conceivably misinterpretable, but it's not technically ambiguous. "Hane" is wrong. It would be easier to forgive the understandable error if "Hane" wasn't so insulting while compounding it.
The lack of intelligence here is stunning. Again , if I wrote almost all human beings have a slower PB than myself, do you really think I am not referring to my best times? Oh my…
Olympic gold and and silver in the marathon. 4x Fukuoka winner when it was basically the World Championships. World number 1 ranked in the marathon 71 to 73. I world personally rank Rodgers and Edelen over Rupp in the marathon.