-
27
-
Jimmy Dore ??
James Patrick Anthony Dore is an American stand-up comedian, political commentator, podcaster, YouTube personality, and conspiracy theorist.
52 -
Covidiocy wrote:
fisky wrote:
This link was posted on the Canaday thread, but it's more appropriate here. If you click on the "full demographic breakdown" at the bottom of the article and then download the data by clicking on the "download" link on that page, you will download an .xlsx spreadsheet with all of the responses by demographics. Here are some key results.
Ques: How likely is it that the vaccine has caused a SIGNIFICANT NUMBER of excess deaths?
Very likely: Dems: 31%, Repubs: 32%
Somewhat likely: Dems: 20%, Repubs: 24%
This is hard to explain away. Over half of Americans, 51% of Democrats and 56% of Republicans, believe that the vaccine has caused a significant number of excess deaths. OVER HALF!
You'd think this would be big news, but you would be wrong. I searched CNN and Fox for rasmussen covid vaccine and found nothing. I did a google search and it wasn't on the first page.
Yes, and it doesn’t capture people like me who are registered unaffiliated voters who not only think people died from the jabs but know so. Of course, it can never be proven, but the course of demise and death started so soon after the injections. I also know one person who died of Covid, or maybe it was the Remdesivir-Modazilam-x protocol implemented to intubate him.
Folks, the antivaxxers best 'data' is now surveys of laypeople's opinions about complex statistical questions.
This is not a joke. This is all they have.
64 -
Harambe wrote:
Folks, the antivaxxers best 'data' is now surveys of laypeople's opinions about complex statistical questions.
This is not a joke. This is all they have.
True. I’m very surprised the Johnson brothers allow it.
54 -
Doesn’t really matter though because it’s an echo chamber of like two crazies so free speech ftw
44 -
Harambe wrote:
Covidiocy wrote:
Yes, and it doesn’t capture people like me who are registered unaffiliated voters who not only think people died from the jabs but know so. Of course, it can never be proven, but the course of demise and death started so soon after the injections. I also know one person who died of Covid, or maybe it was the Remdesivir-Modazilam-x protocol implemented to intubate him.
Folks, the antivaxxers best 'data' is now surveys of laypeople's opinions about complex statistical questions.
This is not a joke. This is all they have.
Nobody is asserting it as “data,” just observational opinion that has become so painfully fukking obvious to any non-moron that is skeptical about the newest raccoon dog “theory.”
What people do question and are right to question is all of the “data” coming out of the CDC or NIH. Or that paper you recently posted about higher auto-immune antibodies in the infected but unvaccinated (so many confounders), even as one of the authors is a prominent anti-natural immunity purveyor and received $2 million in NIH grant money. Offit, to his credit, posited that natural immunity should ‘count’ as two vaccine doses, but Iwasaki, the huge NIH grant benefactor, said no. In fact, Iwasaki has never published anything in favor of natural immunity. So, there’s clear bias and a reason to question Iwasaki’s motives and ‘data.’
46 -
Harambe wrote:
Covidiocy wrote:
Yes, and it doesn’t capture people like me who are registered unaffiliated voters who not only think people died from the jabs but know so. Of course, it can never be proven, but the course of demise and death started so soon after the injections. I also know one person who died of Covid, or maybe it was the Remdesivir-Modazilam-x protocol implemented to intubate him.
Folks, the antivaxxers best 'data' is now surveys of laypeople's opinions about complex statistical questions.
This is not a joke. This is all they have.
Oh, and it’s midazolam since you didn’t reply to that correction. That benzo that, unproven of course, likely killed many intubated patients after Remdesivir compromised their livers.
55 -
Covidiocy wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Folks, the antivaxxers best 'data' is now surveys of laypeople's opinions about complex statistical questions.
This is not a joke. This is all they have.
What people do question and are right to question is all of the “data” coming out of the CDC or NIH. Or that paper you recently posted about higher auto-immune antibodies in the infected but unvaccinated (so many confounders), even as one of the authors is a prominent anti-natural immunity purveyor and received $2 million in NIH grant money. Offit, to his credit, posited that natural immunity should ‘count’ as two vaccine doses, but Iwasaki, the huge NIH grant benefactor, said no. In fact, Iwasaki has never published anything in favor of natural immunity. So, there’s clear bias and a reason to question Iwasaki’s motives and ‘data.’
Iwasaki is maybe the most respected respiratory disease immunologist in the world. I know is frustrating that we’ll informed people don’t agree with what you want to be true, but that’s life.
Every biological scientist in the US takes NIH or other federal govt money. You either don’t understand the funding of science at all in America or you’re pushing a narrative you know is BS. “They take NIH money” is the last bastion before, what?, “it’s the Rothschilds.”Wishing you a life free from COVID induced autoimmunity. The vaccine protected me :)
54 -
Harambe wrote:
Covidiocy wrote:
What people do question and are right to question is all of the “data” coming out of the CDC or NIH. Or that paper you recently posted about higher auto-immune antibodies in the infected but unvaccinated (so many confounders), even as one of the authors is a prominent anti-natural immunity purveyor and received $2 million in NIH grant money. Offit, to his credit, posited that natural immunity should ‘count’ as two vaccine doses, but Iwasaki, the huge NIH grant benefactor, said no. In fact, Iwasaki has never published anything in favor of natural immunity. So, there’s clear bias and a reason to question Iwasaki’s motives and ‘data.’
Wishing you a life free from COVID induced autoimmunity. The vaccine protected me :)
Lol, “K” right back at you. So stressed I am.
Is it possible Iwasaki is “conflicted?”
Thank God for the control group.
35 -
Covidiocy wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Wishing you a life free from COVID induced autoimmunity. The vaccine protected me :)
Lol, “K” right back at you. So stressed I am.
Is it possible Iwasaki is “conflicted?”
Thank God for the control group.
"The entire scientific apparatus in the US (and the World) is deeply corrupted to push... mRNA vaccines, which happen to be the one thing I care deeply about.
Somehow Pfizer has bought all the scientists in the NIH AND all the thousands of scientists they fund and nobody has blown the whistle.
Look, if that's your argument.... uh, sure.
84 -
#10132
This post was removed.
-
The same Rasmussen survey asked do you personally know anyone who you think died from the vaccine? Assuming the vaccine is as safe as it's purported to be, you'd expect the yes responses to be very low... single digits... and mostly in the Republican cohort. That wasn't the case. Instead, it was higher among Democrats and shockingly high in both groups.
Democrats: 33%
Republicans: 26%
The xlsx spreadsheet sorts the responses by race, age, sex, etc. Interestingly, the lowest percentage was found in the 65+ cohort with only 14% replying yes. That partially explains why there doesn't seem to be any booster hesitancy in the 65+ cohort.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.22 -
I posted a paper showing that vaccination greatly mitigates autoimmune issues after COVID infection.
The response: 'I think one of the co-authors is bought by the NIH engaged in a globe-spanning conspiracy. I have no evidence for this.'
Compelling!
53 -
Harambe wrote:
I posted a paper showing that vaccination greatly mitigates autoimmune issues after COVID infection.
The response: 'I think one of the co-authors is bought by the NIH engaged in a globe-spanning conspiracy. I have no evidence for this.'
Compelling!
"The most potent vaccination is getting infected yourself," Fauci, back when Fauci was part of the globe-spanning anti-vaxxer conspiracy against vaccines, masks, and public health; before he had become science incarnate and brought the "Light and Truth" unto the world.
23 -
Alex Jones Was Right wrote:
Harambe wrote:
I posted a paper showing that vaccination greatly mitigates autoimmune issues after COVID infection.
The response: 'I think one of the co-authors is bought by the NIH engaged in a globe-spanning conspiracy. I have no evidence for this.'
Compelling!
"The most potent vaccination is getting infected yourself," Fauci, back when Fauci was part of the globe-spanning anti-vaxxer conspiracy against vaccines, masks, and public health; before he had become science incarnate and brought the "Light and Truth" unto the world.
This is a satirical post, right?
33 -
Lots of anecdotal stories of medical professionals being reluctant to file VAERS reports. It's easy to understand why when medical professionals are fired for making VAERS reports.
23 -
44
-
Can anyone name one famous person who died from Covid who was not already extremely ill?
23
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
Of General Interest
-
1:49.84 - 800m Freshmen National Record - Cooper Lutkenhaus (check this kick out!!)
-
Emma Coburn to miss Olympic Trials after breaking ankle in Suzhou
-
Jakob on Oly 1500- “Walk in the park if I don’t get injured or sick”
-
VALBY has graduated (w/ honors) from Florida, will she go to grad school??
-
Men who run twice a day and the women who love/put up with them