Top world tennis player Novak Djokovic has been banned from playing in the United States since 2020 because he refuses to get vaccinated. This ridiculous, in...
But, anyone who goes pulling on that "vaccine" thread quickly finds it starts unraveling things like vaccine passports, CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currencies) tied to social credit scores, 15 min cities, transhumanism, etc. To be correct on "my body, my choice" versus medical tyranny of mandatory "vaccines" tied to employment and basic human rights trumps almost everything else one can think of.
Bro AI is gonna turn you into paperclips in less than a decade. Don’t stress so much. It’s all meaningless
If it’s all meaningless, then why do you care so much about purveying your bull$hit and forcing it on everyone? I mean, with climate change, isn’t it a good thing the fatties are dying off? Isn’t that Darwinism at its finest, oh Holier-than-thou “molecular biologist” and “crypto trader?”
DeathSantis, Djoke, and antivaxxers go home devastated
Seriously man, why are you here? You bring absolutely nothing to the conversation. You don’t know science, you never post or analyze a paper. You just mock and condescend, riding on Harambe’s coattails.
I already posted two CDC papers recently where they are slowly but surely admitting that there is no real, substantial difference between natural immunity and/or vaccination against all variants, including Omicron. Natural immunity was just as good as three shots but more durable, and only slightly worse than natural immunity PLUS three shots, again, with a waning vax-induced response. Their own conclusion was that ANY form of immunity was effective against ALL variants. They did NOT distinguish in their conclusion. Moreover, a subsequent paper on the bivalent vaccine showed incredibly poor efficacy some four months on, again with a waning effect.
Here is a primer on some basics about natural and vax-induced immunity versus SARS-Cov2 from one Dr. Monica Gandhi, a UCSF and Berkeley-trained physician, hardly “conservative” spheres of influence. Note, she promotes vaccination, especially in certain groups stratified by risk. She is by no means an “anti-vaxxer.” This is the doctor Harambe libeled and mischaracterized.
Why don’t you break down and summarize what she’s saying here without Harambe doing your homework for you? Why don’t you add value for once? I’d like to see it. Take your best shot. Are you capable of dissecting this? Or are you just a typical 20-something know-it-all d-bag who has nothing meaningful to say? I’m serious. Break it down. Go…
DeathSantis, Djoke, and antivaxxers go home devastated
Seriously man, why are you here? You bring absolutely nothing to the conversation. You don’t know science, you never post or analyze a paper. You just mock and condescend.
Precisely. Because there is no conversation to be had with most antivaxxers on here, they aren't interested in arguing in good faith. This was clear from way more than a year ago. Just stooping to their level now and enjoying every delicious minute of it.
Seriously man, why are you here? You bring absolutely nothing to the conversation. You don’t know science, you never post or analyze a paper. You just mock and condescend.
Precisely. Because there is no conversation to be had with most antivaxxers on here, they aren't interested in arguing in good faith. This was clear from way more than a year ago. Just stooping to their level now and enjoying every delicious minute of it.
Lol, in other words you are incapable of analyzing it. Love how you left the “riding on Harambe’s coattails” and other details about the science out in your selective response. In other words, open your mouth and remove all doubt. Got it. Thanks.
Precisely. Because there is no conversation to be had with most antivaxxers on here, they aren't interested in arguing in good faith. This was clear from way more than a year ago. Just stooping to their level now and enjoying every delicious minute of it.
Lol, in other words you are incapable of analyzing it. Love how you left the “riding on Harambe’s coattails” and other details about the science out in your selective response. In other words, open your mouth and remove all doubt. Got it. Thanks.
It’s a message board dude , no one is opening their mouths .
Precisely. Because there is no conversation to be had with most antivaxxers on here, they aren't interested in arguing in good faith. This was clear from way more than a year ago. Just stooping to their level now and enjoying every delicious minute of it.
Lol, in other words you are incapable of analyzing it. Love how you left the “riding on Harambe’s coattails” and other details about the science out in your selective response. In other words, open your mouth and remove all doubt. Got it. Thanks.
What does this have to do with Harambe? My replies are mostly to antivaxxers and are to mock the outlandishly stupid takes they have, their embarrassing grasp and use of statistics, and their tired regurgitating of the same old memes they think make them look wise and in the know about something the medical community is unaware of. I posted under a different name in the pandemic of the unvaccinated thread and engaged honestly for a while, but it became clear there was no discussion to be had with people like DanM, Ghost of disco Gary, Unkle, Steve, and all the other antivax whack jobs. I admire Harambe for even continuing to engage with people like this, he has greater character than I do. I prefer to just mock and sh!tpost because that’s what sh!t posts deserve.
Dr. Anthony Fauci joins CNN's Jim Acosta to discuss the minority view that the Covid-19 virus occurred as a result of work in a Chinese lab known as the "lab...
Lord and saviour Fauci on the covid lab theory: mentions we should be open minded, while stating that the data and a large group of scientists have come to a fairly certain conclusion that the virus originated naturally.
In the spirit of honest engagement and contribution to the “discussion” going on here, as covidiocy demands, what do you vaccine “skeptics” think?
Lord and saviour Fauci on the covid lab theory: mentions we should be open minded, while stating that the data and a large group of scientists have come to a fairly certain conclusion that the virus originated naturally.
In the spirit of honest engagement and contribution to the “discussion” going on here, as covidiocy demands, what do you vaccine “skeptics” think?
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky is experiencing a rebound of Covid-19 symptoms after taking Pfizer Inc.’s antiviral Paxlovid.
Lol, in other words you are incapable of analyzing it. Love how you left the “riding on Harambe’s coattails” and other details about the science out in your selective response. In other words, open your mouth and remove all doubt. Got it. Thanks.
What does this have to do with Harambe? My replies are mostly to antivaxxers and are to mock the outlandishly stupid takes they have, their embarrassing grasp and use of statistics, and their tired regurgitating of the same old memes they think make them look wise and in the know about something the medical community is unaware of. I posted under a different name in the pandemic of the unvaccinated thread and engaged honestly for a while, but it became clear there was no discussion to be had with people like DanM, Ghost of disco Gary, Unkle, Steve, and all the other antivax whack jobs. I admire Harambe for even continuing to engage with people like this, he has greater character than I do. I prefer to just mock and sh!tpost because that’s what sh!t posts deserve.
The "vaccines" you took will finish you, the people you blindly trusted will have made a point to NOT to injected with the real thing and will need to tried and executed.
What does this have to do with Harambe? My replies are mostly to antivaxxers and are to mock the outlandishly stupid takes they have, their embarrassing grasp and use of statistics, and their tired regurgitating of the same old memes they think make them look wise and in the know about something the medical community is unaware of. I posted under a different name in the pandemic of the unvaccinated thread and engaged honestly for a while, but it became clear there was no discussion to be had with people like DanM, Ghost of disco Gary, Unkle, Steve, and all the other antivax whack jobs. I admire Harambe for even continuing to engage with people like this, he has greater character than I do. I prefer to just mock and sh!tpost because that’s what sh!t posts deserve.
The "vaccines" you took will finish you, the people you blindly trusted will have made a point to NOT to injected with the real thing and will need to tried and executed.
DeathSantis, Djoke, and antivaxxers go home devastated
Seriously man, why are you here? You bring absolutely nothing to the conversation. You don’t know science, you never post or analyze a paper. You just mock and condescend, riding on Harambe’s coattails.
I already posted two CDC papers recently where they are slowly but surely admitting that there is no real, substantial difference between natural immunity and/or vaccination against all variants, including Omicron. Natural immunity was just as good as three shots but more durable, and only slightly worse than natural immunity PLUS three shots, again, with a waning vax-induced response. Their own conclusion was that ANY form of immunity was effective against ALL variants. They did NOT distinguish in their conclusion. Moreover, a subsequent paper on the bivalent vaccine showed incredibly poor efficacy some four months on, again with a waning effect.
Here is a primer on some basics about natural and vax-induced immunity versus SARS-Cov2 from one Dr. Monica Gandhi, a UCSF and Berkeley-trained physician, hardly “conservative” spheres of influence. Note, she promotes vaccination, especially in certain groups stratified by risk. She is by no means an “anti-vaxxer.” This is the doctor Harambe libeled and mischaracterized.
Why don’t you break down and summarize what she’s saying here without Harambe doing your homework for you? Why don’t you add value for once? I’d like to see it. Take your best shot. Are you capable of dissecting this? Or are you just a typical 20-something know-it-all d-bag who has nothing meaningful to say? I’m serious. Break it down. Go…
Ghandi badly damaged her reputation months ago by trying to pretend that the US doesn't 'recognize' natural immunity. Major tilting at windmills. Nothing I said was remotely close to 'libel' under US laws (opinions are, of course, protected speech -- move to China if you don't like that, bud).
The thread you linked just lays out a host of immune principles that largely apply to both infection and vaccine driven immunity. It's a good primer. It doesn't say anything about the relatively superiority (and is from ~2021 so any claims would be outdated).
Ironic that Ghandi is extremely pro vaccine and recently posted the following paper, for example, showing that vaccines are strongly associated with reduced risk of 'long COVID' symptoms. Natural immunity destroyed again.
LONG COVID & VACCINATION: Long COVID symptoms associated with having had severe disease, less prevalent now; even with severe disease, vaccination mitigates the long COVID symptoms (creating adaptive immunity, turning response from innate immunity)https://t.co/eh2vcq1iKA
Lol, in other words you are incapable of analyzing it. Love how you left the “riding on Harambe’s coattails” and other details about the science out in your selective response. In other words, open your mouth and remove all doubt. Got it. Thanks.
What does this have to do with Harambe? My replies are mostly to antivaxxers and are to mock the outlandishly stupid takes they have, their embarrassing grasp and use of statistics, and their tired regurgitating of the same old memes they think make them look wise and in the know about something the medical community is unaware of. I posted under a different name in the pandemic of the unvaccinated thread and engaged honestly for a while, but it became clear there was no discussion to be had with people like DanM, Ghost of disco Gary, Unkle, Steve, and all the other antivax whack jobs. I admire Harambe for even continuing to engage with people like this, he has greater character than I do. I prefer to just mock and sh!tpost because that’s what sh!t posts deserve.
The antivaxxers are obsessed with me because they are masochistically dedicated to getting owned week in and week out.
Sh-tposting is a necessary part of antivaxxer owning. Keep up the good work, friend.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) admitted on Sunday that her administration's pandemic-era lockdown policies went too far, such as her April 2020 executive order barring most stores from selling gardening supplies, including seeds and plants, to Americans who anted to grow their own fruits and vegetables.
The "vaccines" you took will finish you, the people you blindly trusted will have made a point to NOT to injected with the real thing and will need to tried and executed.
A new study covertly released by the Israeli Ministry of Health confirms what we know from the Medicare data: the COVID vaccines increase your risk of death over time.
Seriously man, why are you here? You bring absolutely nothing to the conversation. You don’t know science, you never post or analyze a paper. You just mock and condescend, riding on Harambe’s coattails.
I already posted two CDC papers recently where they are slowly but surely admitting that there is no real, substantial difference between natural immunity and/or vaccination against all variants, including Omicron. Natural immunity was just as good as three shots but more durable, and only slightly worse than natural immunity PLUS three shots, again, with a waning vax-induced response. Their own conclusion was that ANY form of immunity was effective against ALL variants. They did NOT distinguish in their conclusion. Moreover, a subsequent paper on the bivalent vaccine showed incredibly poor efficacy some four months on, again with a waning effect.
Here is a primer on some basics about natural and vax-induced immunity versus SARS-Cov2 from one Dr. Monica Gandhi, a UCSF and Berkeley-trained physician, hardly “conservative” spheres of influence. Note, she promotes vaccination, especially in certain groups stratified by risk. She is by no means an “anti-vaxxer.” This is the doctor Harambe libeled and mischaracterized.
Why don’t you break down and summarize what she’s saying here without Harambe doing your homework for you? Why don’t you add value for once? I’d like to see it. Take your best shot. Are you capable of dissecting this? Or are you just a typical 20-something know-it-all d-bag who has nothing meaningful to say? I’m serious. Break it down. Go…
Ghandi badly damaged her reputation months ago by trying to pretend that the US doesn't 'recognize' natural immunity. Major tilting at windmills. Nothing I said was remotely close to 'libel' under US laws (opinions are, of course, protected speech -- move to China if you don't like that, bud).
The thread you linked just lays out a host of immune principles that largely apply to both infection and vaccine driven immunity. It's a good primer. It doesn't say anything about the relatively superiority (and is from ~2021 so any claims would be outdated).
Ironic that Ghandi is extremely pro vaccine and recently posted the following paper, for example, showing that vaccines are strongly associated with reduced risk of 'long COVID' symptoms. Natural immunity destroyed again.
You've accidentally aligned yourself with someone who thinks everyone should get the vax. You're one of us. Welcome, brother.
First of all, that’s exactly what I called it, “a primer.” It’s just a good basic immunology review, both that induced by infection and injection. I invited “Anti-vaxxers killing Democracy” to dissect it & break it down instead of you because I knew he was incapable. And, unable to refuse to hear yourself talk, here you are doing it for him like clockwork. How predictable. Good job saving him though.
Also, on p. 494, you literally wrote: “The policies Gandhi advocated for would have led to 100k+ additional American deaths. But hey, what she says 'just makes sense, bro.'”
Ok, what specific policies are you referring to? Specifically? Because, as you said, she is a vaccine proponent. Interesting that she’s just tilting at windmills since you yourself think Djokovic’s natural immunity predicament is “hilarious.”
Oh, and it’s Gandhi, not Ghandi. So you would misrepresent her and the spelling of her name.
Natural immunity is definitely not destroyed. In fact, it’s very much here to stay, laugh out loud.