Official Covid Vaccine thread

fisky wrote:

Let me BLUF this post. (Bottom Line Up Front).

BLUF: Two more surveys... these done by Zogby... have found similar vaccine adverse effects to the 3 previous surveys I linked to earlier in this thread. They found that vaccine adverse effects are much higher than officially reported.

Links to the two surveys are at the bottom of the article linked to below. I suggest you peruse the actual survey responses since the article is unclear in spots. Here are some key points from the larger, all adults survey.

- 15% diagnosed with new condition after vaccination

- 10% of these new conditions are serious (i.e., 1.5% of all respondents reported a serious adverse effect)

- 10% had a flare up of a pre-existing condition

Ques 5: New conditions were MUCH HIGHER in the 18-29 and 30-49 cohorts. Normally, you would expect more new conditions in the older cohorts.

Q6: New conditions were a laundry list of conditions linked to the vaccines.

Q7: Flare ups of pre-existing conditions were MUCH HIGHER in the 18-29 and 30-49 cohorts.

Q16-18: Do you trust the CDC, FDA, Fauci? Yes: About 60%

Q19: Poorly worded question on ivermectin. Disregard it. The question asked about "pre-approved drugs such as ivermectin." Ivermectin was never approved for covid and has been effectively banned, yet the wording strongly implies that it was pre-approved for covid. Someone should have caught this before sending out the survey. Poorly worded questions are subject to reader interpretation of what the question is asking and that skews the results.

Q20: Have certain government agencies DELIBERATELY SUPPRESSED early treatments? Yes 46%. THIS IS HUGE. If these early treatments were deliberately suppressed, does it mean that the government was complicit in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people by deliberately suppressing early treatments that might have saved those lives? The FLCCC would say yes. I would say yes. Future surveys should ask follow-up questions on this point.

We now have five surveys that all indicate that vaccine adverse effects are much higher than officially reported. (Note: The second survey was conducted on the 18-49 cohort only. The results in 18-49 were similar to the 18-49 cohort in the first survey that included older cohorts.)

I mined the data in both surveys for more specifics, the odds of a life threatening condition were 1 in 655. The odds of a severe and continuing adverse effect were 1 in 93.

The first five surveys included 1,500 people. These two Zogby surveys included 1,967 people. Several of the questions were different between Zogby and the first three surveys, but the similar questions received similar responses.

Link:childrenshealthdefense.org/press-relea...

fisky wrote:

fisky wrote:

Let me BLUF this post. (Bottom Line Up Front).

BLUF: Two more surveys... these done by Zogby... have found similar vaccine adverse effects to the 3 previous surveys I linked to earlier in this thread. They found that vaccine adverse effects are much higher than officially reported.

Links to the two surveys are at the bottom of the article linked to below. I suggest you peruse the actual survey responses since the article is unclear in spots. Here are some key points from the larger, all adults survey.

- 15% diagnosed with new condition after vaccination

- 10% of these new conditions are serious (i.e., 1.5% of all respondents reported a serious adverse effect)

- 10% had a flare up of a pre-existing condition

Ques 5: New conditions were MUCH HIGHER in the 18-29 and 30-49 cohorts. Normally, you would expect more new conditions in the older cohorts.

Q6: New conditions were a laundry list of conditions linked to the vaccines.

Q7: Flare ups of pre-existing conditions were MUCH HIGHER in the 18-29 and 30-49 cohorts.

Q16-18: Do you trust the CDC, FDA, Fauci? Yes: About 60%

Q19: Poorly worded question on ivermectin. Disregard it. The question asked about "pre-approved drugs such as ivermectin." Ivermectin was never approved for covid and has been effectively banned, yet the wording strongly implies that it was pre-approved for covid. Someone should have caught this before sending out the survey. Poorly worded questions are subject to reader interpretation of what the question is asking and that skews the results.

Q20: Have certain government agencies DELIBERATELY SUPPRESSED early treatments? Yes 46%. THIS IS HUGE. If these early treatments were deliberately suppressed, does it mean that the government was complicit in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people by deliberately suppressing early treatments that might have saved those lives? The FLCCC would say yes. I would say yes. Future surveys should ask follow-up questions on this point.

We now have five surveys that all indicate that vaccine adverse effects are much higher than officially reported. (Note: The second survey was conducted on the 18-49 cohort only. The results in 18-49 were similar to the 18-49 cohort in the first survey that included older cohorts.)

I mined the data in both surveys for more specifics, the odds of a life threatening condition were 1 in 655. The odds of a severe and continuing adverse effect were 1 in 93.

The first five surveys included 1,500 people. These two Zogby surveys included 1,967 people. Several of the questions were different between Zogby and the first three surveys, but the similar questions received similar responses.

Link:childrenshealthdefense.org/press-relea...

It's been six days since this press release. Every major and most minor news outlets have received this press release, yet as of yesterday, there has been no media coverage of this Zogby survey. A Google search for Zogby in the past week did not find this story in any mainstream media. A search of FoxNews did not find a mention of it. The media, left and right, is afraid to touch this story, probably out of fear that it would anger their pharmaceutical sponsors.

Meanwhile, I did a comparison of responses in the two surveys. If the margin of error is 3.1% as Zogby claims, then these two polls should be pretty close when looking at identical questions in identical age cohorts.

I looked at percent diagnosed with new conditions and flare-ups in pre-existing conditions in the 18-29 and 30-49 cohorts. The responses in one survey were within 3-4% of the identical question (and cohort) in the other study. This, to me, indicates that these surveys are reliable and the findings are, if not accurate, at least within the ballpark.

Looking for unusual trends, I found that new conditions were more than twice as likely to occur in minorities. The percent reporting new conditions after vaccination for whites, Hispanics, Blacks, and Asians were 11%, 34%, 20%, and 23% respectively. It seems like this would be newsworthy as well.

Extrapolating that to the entire population.... That's... let's see... about 3.9 million Blacks and 13 million Hispanics who have been diagnosed with a new condition since getting vaccinated. Since it's 1 in 3 Hispanics, that should be easily recognizable in health care organizations and hospitals with a high percentage of Hispanic patients.

I wonder if our politicians will eventually see the handwriting on the wall and react like this...

Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME