deydoodoodohdohdontdeydoo? wrote:
John Wesley Harding wrote:
Fine...I’ll tell you that Jakob has not run “<3:28”.
I don’t think Wale’s 3k is necessarily better than Jakob’s outdoor 1500 PB, and I’m not gonna claim he and Barega are overall better runners than Jakob, but you should admit that 3:31.8 is the 3rd most impressive mid/long distance performance of the meet.
Why is that? Because you like to denigrate European athletes subject to much stricter doping controls than East Africans? Jakob just ran the 5th fastest time ever indoors and broke the European record, with no competition (which actually included the WR holder). Plus the 1500m is 10 x the importance of the 3000m.
No.
Because 3:31.8i is worth 1274 points on the IAAF scoring tables, while 7:24.98i is worth 1298 points, and Tsegay’s 3:53.09i is worth 1285 points. Outdoors, the disparity becomes greater: 1219 for Jakob, 1271 for Wale, 1262 for Tsegay.
Because Tsegay’s run was the WR, Wale’s was the 2nd fastest time ever, and Ingebrigtsen’s was the 5th fastest time ever. Outdoors, the times would make Wale #3 AT, Tsegay #8 AT (#4 non-Chinese national championships), and Ingebrigtsen #102 AT.
Because the pacing was more erratic in the W1500 and M3K, causing us all to wonder what kind of potential could be there, while Jakob’s race went according to the script—and finally, nonessentially, because we all expected this performance from Jakob coming in, whereas nobody was predicting Tsegay 3:53.09 or Wale 7:24.9.
I don’t believe that I “like to denigrate European athletes” for one minute. I’m sure doping played into today’s results, but has nothing to do with my assessment. I know doping is a problem in East Africa, but I don’t dismiss all East African talent as being doped, because I’m not a fool.