Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
A counter-argument would first require an argument.
My view? Which view is mine? Have I expressed a view? Can you be more specific?
Which "argument" do you think I am supposed to counter?
Which view have I expressed that you would like me to support with a citation?
A wind-up doll whose head has come off would be more coherent. Your evasiveness has acquired comic proportions. You've lost your wits along with the argument. I don't expect you to know what the "argument" is - your head would need screwing back on.
Oh I didn't see that coming.
Who could have predicted that you would add more imaginary ideas that you would not be able to substantiate?
Who could have predicted that you would accuse me of evasiveness, as you continue to evade?
Who could have predicted that instead of providing substance to your imagination, you would resort to insults and some weird analogy about a headless wind-up doll?
I have not given "my view" of any "argument" in this thread, one way or another. To the extent I made any argument at all, the subject of that argument is your inability to substantiate your ideas with authority. It is not easy to prove a negative, but I offer as further demonstrations your inability to connect breathing to EPO, and your inability now to express exactly what counter-argument I am supposed to provide a citation for.