What about when you take into consideration that the pro athlete has been injured for an extended period of time last year and has not had ideal training coming into this season? And that Oregon and NAU runners likely don’t have the heaviest class load? And have better facilities than the pro? And the fact that the college runners are on scholarship so they too are basically payed to run? And how about the fact that for many pro runners there is an adjustment period to pro training and living at altitude that collegiate runners might still have to go through? Progression is not linear through an entire career. Hunter would have beat both of these guys last summer. Right now the collegiate runners are better. Should Drew be beating them? probably. BUT you have to consider these other factors which show that he was beating their times and might soon be beating them again. AND realize that these college kids are training at a very high level as well also under the top coaches in the world and will not magically improve the second they turn pro.