The MyPillow founder and election denier offered the money to anyone who could disprove his claim about data he said showed China manipulated the 2020 U.S. election.
This is like the covid thread. Hundreds of pages yet not one single idiot ever changed their opinion that Trump was defrauded.
Even after they have been told by the people that lied to them that they were lying. It still changes nothing to the Trumper.
Explain how any reasonable person would conclude the Pennsylvania election was legitimate.
Ballots were sent out unsolicited to tens of thousands of ineligible voters.
All ballots returned were counted without signature verification.
It is not possible to claim elections held this way are legitimate.
Thanks for reinforcing the point of "Stater of the Obvious".
Ballots were sent to people on the legal voter list. All that BS you just posted has been debunked over and over. It is amazing that people still think that a state with Republican House and Senate control for 10 years prior to and including the '20 election somehow threw the election to the Democrats. You gotta be some kind of moron to believe that.
Trump lost because he is a polarizing person. He polarized too many people against himself by claiming half the country was out to get him, and by extension, you his loyal follower. >50% of the population saw through this self serving BS and decided that almost anyone would be a better president, even in states that often go Republican.
Maybe if the Republican party got a sort of moderate candidate who did not constantly blame everyone but himself for his problems, they would do better. Until they do, expect losses.
Explain how any reasonable person would conclude the Pennsylvania election was legitimate.
Ballots were sent out unsolicited to tens of thousands of ineligible voters.
All ballots returned were counted without signature verification.
It is not possible to claim elections held this way are legitimate.
Thanks for reinforcing the point of "Stater of the Obvious".
Ballots were sent to people on the legal voter list. All that BS you just posted has been debunked over and over. It is amazing that people still think that a state with Republican House and Senate control for 10 years prior to and including the '20 election somehow threw the election to the Democrats. You gotta be some kind of moron to believe that.
Trump lost because he is a polarizing person. He polarized too many people against himself by claiming half the country was out to get him, and by extension, you his loyal follower. >50% of the population saw through this self serving BS and decided that almost anyone would be a better president, even in states that often go Republican.
Maybe if the Republican party got a sort of moderate candidate who did not constantly blame everyone but himself for his problems, they would do better. Until they do, expect losses.
Your ignorance is showing. The voter rolls are packed with ineligible voters.
LA county alone had 1.2 MILLION ineligible voters on the rolls.
If you think this didn't have an impact on an election with mass mail in voting with ZERO signature verification you're absolutely delusional. If you think a national election decided by less than 100,000 votes wasn't impacted by this you're absolutely delusional.
Trump got 13 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016.
Biden didn't campaign and got 12 million more votes than Obama in 2008. Sure!
I'm not a republican every election I'm forced to choose between the lesser of 2 evils. Trump sucks but he is far and away better than Biden or Clinton.
To reiterate: Trump lost because he is a polarizing person. People came out in droves for and against him but more against.
Every investigation of voter fraud turned up.... NOTHING. Every legal case thrown out of court for lack of evidence - even by Trump appointed judges. The sham investigation in AZ found MORE votes for Biden. Fox is paying $787M because there was overwhelming proof they lied about and knew they were lying. It was safer to pay up front than go through a trial and probably be slapped with the full amount of the suit for their egregious lies.
The voter rolls you refer to were inactive. This means that NO ONE voted with these ballots for several elections after registering legally. That is apathy, not fraud.
To reiterate: Trump lost because he is a polarizing person. People came out in droves for and against him but more against.
Every investigation of voter fraud turned up.... NOTHING. Every legal case thrown out of court for lack of evidence - even by Trump appointed judges. The sham investigation in AZ found MORE votes for Biden. Fox is paying $787M because there was overwhelming proof they lied about and knew they were lying. It was safer to pay up front than go through a trial and probably be slapped with the full amount of the suit for their egregious lies.
The voter rolls you refer to were inactive. This means that NO ONE voted with these ballots for several elections after registering legally. That is apathy, not fraud.
There are still MILLIONS of people on the voter rolls who are not eligible to vote. LA county is 1 county and it's just an example of how polluted the voter rolls are. In places like Pennsylvania and Nevada they mailed a ballot to 100% of the people on the voter rolls whether they were inactive or not. You're being dishonest.
Answer the question.
How do you prove a ballot that was mailed to a random address and is counted without verifying the signature was a legal vote?
To reiterate: Trump lost because he is a polarizing person. People came out in droves for and against him but more against.
Every investigation of voter fraud turned up.... NOTHING. Every legal case thrown out of court for lack of evidence - even by Trump appointed judges. The sham investigation in AZ found MORE votes for Biden. Fox is paying $787M because there was overwhelming proof they lied about and knew they were lying. It was safer to pay up front than go through a trial and probably be slapped with the full amount of the suit for their egregious lies.
The voter rolls you refer to were inactive. This means that NO ONE voted with these ballots for several elections after registering legally. That is apathy, not fraud.
There are still MILLIONS of people on the voter rolls who are not eligible to vote. LA county is 1 county and it's just an example of how polluted the voter rolls are. In places like Pennsylvania and Nevada they mailed a ballot to 100% of the people on the voter rolls whether they were inactive or not. You're being dishonest.
Answer the question.
How do you prove a ballot that was mailed to a random address and is counted without verifying the signature was a legal vote?
It was sent to the registered voter on record. How do you prove the votes were fraudulent? Well, entities can mount legal claims and open local investigations. Which they did and were thrown out of court for lack of evidence and investigations found nothing.
Your argument is "a ballot sent to a registered voter MIGHT have been intercepted and used fraudulently". But the evidence is against this.
Which is easier to believe:
A. In all but one (2004) Presidential election since 1988, a Democrat has won the popular vote. Trump is a polarizing figure who lost the popular vote in 2 elections but won the first election due to winning a few key states that swung the Electoral College count to him. In Congress and Senate, Republicans have fared better by holding the majority approximately 2/3 of the last 22 years.
B. The 2020 election was rife with fraud so much so that Trump actually should have won millions more votes and/or Biden millions less. But all Republican wins in the House and Senate are legitimate from the same states that were fraudulent.
To reiterate: Trump lost because he is a polarizing person. People came out in droves for and against him but more against.
Every investigation of voter fraud turned up.... NOTHING. Every legal case thrown out of court for lack of evidence - even by Trump appointed judges. The sham investigation in AZ found MORE votes for Biden. Fox is paying $787M because there was overwhelming proof they lied about and knew they were lying. It was safer to pay up front than go through a trial and probably be slapped with the full amount of the suit for their egregious lies.
The voter rolls you refer to were inactive. This means that NO ONE voted with these ballots for several elections after registering legally. That is apathy, not fraud.
There are still MILLIONS of people on the voter rolls who are not eligible to vote. LA county is 1 county and it's just an example of how polluted the voter rolls are. In places like Pennsylvania and Nevada they mailed a ballot to 100% of the people on the voter rolls whether they were inactive or not. You're being dishonest.
Answer the question.
How do you prove a ballot that was mailed to a random address and is counted without verifying the signature was a legal vote?
I wonder if Trump will run on something even remotely policy related this time around? I mean that would be a good place to start to win an election. Economic policy; let’s hear one.
There are still MILLIONS of people on the voter rolls who are not eligible to vote. LA county is 1 county and it's just an example of how polluted the voter rolls are. In places like Pennsylvania and Nevada they mailed a ballot to 100% of the people on the voter rolls whether they were inactive or not. You're being dishonest.
Answer the question.
How do you prove a ballot that was mailed to a random address and is counted without verifying the signature was a legal vote?
It was sent to the registered voter on record. How do you prove the votes were fraudulent? Well, entities can mount legal claims and open local investigations. Which they did and were thrown out of court for lack of evidence and investigations found nothing.
Your argument is "a ballot sent to a registered voter MIGHT have been intercepted and used fraudulently". But the evidence is against this.
Which is easier to believe:
A. In all but one (2004) Presidential election since 1988, a Democrat has won the popular vote. Trump is a polarizing figure who lost the popular vote in 2 elections but won the first election due to winning a few key states that swung the Electoral College count to him. In Congress and Senate, Republicans have fared better by holding the majority approximately 2/3 of the last 22 years.
B. The 2020 election was rife with fraud so much so that Trump actually should have won millions more votes and/or Biden millions less. But all Republican wins in the House and Senate are legitimate from the same states that were fraudulent.
There are still MILLIONS of people on the voter rolls who are not eligible to vote. LA county is 1 county and it's just an example of how polluted the voter rolls are. In places like Pennsylvania and Nevada they mailed a ballot to 100% of the people on the voter rolls whether they were inactive or not. You're being dishonest.
Answer the question.
How do you prove a ballot that was mailed to a random address and is counted without verifying the signature was a legal vote?
It was sent to the registered voter on record. How do you prove the votes were fraudulent? Well, entities can mount legal claims and open local investigations. Which they did and were thrown out of court for lack of evidence and investigations found nothing.
Your argument is "a ballot sent to a registered voter MIGHT have been intercepted and used fraudulently". But the evidence is against this.
Which is easier to believe:
A. In all but one (2004) Presidential election since 1988, a Democrat has won the popular vote. Trump is a polarizing figure who lost the popular vote in 2 elections but won the first election due to winning a few key states that swung the Electoral College count to him. In Congress and Senate, Republicans have fared better by holding the majority approximately 2/3 of the last 22 years.
B. The 2020 election was rife with fraud so much so that Trump actually should have won millions more votes and/or Biden millions less. But all Republican wins in the House and Senate are legitimate from the same states that were fraudulent.
And there are MILLIONS more "voters on record" in the country than there are actual voters.
In a high-impact case of potential voter fraud you’ll learn about only from Judicial Watch, a new investigation reveals likely ineligible voter registrations around the country. In November, Judicial Watch’s election integrit...
Virginity is a social construct traditionally used to control young women, but for young men in the last decade, the social construct has haunted them instead. About 27% of men under thirty report …
