Where did Shalane go for those 92 seconds behind the crowds?

Too--soon wrote:

Think she lost a bet to Ryan hall.....

Seems to me she was in trouble from 30 - 35k

Is that 15:44 accurate?

oliver stoner wrote:

see what I did wrote:

Did she have to take a 'Radcliffe'?

Perhaps there was a second $hitter?

Post of the Year, for those of us old enough to remember. Better than the conspiracy theories flying around the men's race!

no non no. not even close to a ratcliffe. she went be bihind the stands. ahe did NOT drop a deuce right in the middle of the course

Guessing she did not have Run Chow for breakfast this morning.

tempo_orslower wrote:

Guessing she did not have Run Chow for breakfast this morning.

Or maybe taking a masking agent for doping procedures to come. You got to know she dirty.

lazinonamondayafternoon wrote:

oliver stoner wrote:

Perhaps there was a second $hitter?

Post of the Year, for those of us old enough to remember. Better than the conspiracy theories flying around the men's race!

I second this motion.

If true, the lost time could have come over two 5k segments. Her even splits could have come when others had negative splits. Fine job though.

Explain how stopping for 92seconds could possibly be spread out over multiple splits when stopping implies she was not moving.

She puked afterwards. Never went off course.

To see her dealer.

(somebody was obligated to say it)

She needed more Botox for her forehead prior to photo ops.

Former BAA Athlete wrote:

clogged pipe wrote:

Nevertheless, bottom line is she ran **best American time ever.** On this coarse course.

Fixed, though I don't think there is anything too coarse about the Boston Marathon course.

Of course not.

I know what I could have done in 92 seconds with her. That would leave me a :28 stroke fest to finish. Or maybe the Boston crowds would gussy me up to completely finish in 92 seconds. It's possible.