the truth teller feller wrote:
Follow the criteria wrote:
I think it is funny that every year the New England schools cry that they should have more teams at nationals and every year they continue to not run out of the region to get the wins the committee is looking for. They spend money to go overnight to lehigh which does nothing for them but don’t go to Rowan (or Oshkosh, Oberlin, wherever prenats is- Rowan is drivable and not much further than Lehigh). New England got lucky St Thomas bailed them out going to Conn College’s meet or they would have no quality wins again and be looking at 4 teams. Now they have a chance to get 5-6 depending on how regionals plays out.
For such “great academic schools” they seem to have trouble following the criteria the selection committee has given them.
New England sucks. Bunch of soft, time-trial cucks who peak running against other soft runners and then get waxed by WIAC schools at Nats. Happens every year.
With that said, let's get some UAA power rankings! And let's hear your best Padgett bread/CMU showers/who is Rochester/lol Brandeis jokes!
There is a UAA specific thread with all of four posts. Why? The conference just isn't that interesting this year.
Shame. Those jokes are always really funny.