Animal Farm diversity strength wrote:
Maybe they will promise to appoint more prejudiced and hateful anti-progress justices like RBG and Kagan who voted for this "unconstitutional" "Muslim" ban.
This "unanimous" decision is all Fake News.
As stated, it was only "per curiam", which just means that, well, it was designated as "per curiam"...
In practice, it just means that no names go on the main opinion. Thus the lack of a dissent by any individual (as can be seen in other "per curiam" opinions), doesn't mean anything specifically, because they didn't sign the main opinion either. Maybe the others (like Ginsburg) are waiting for the main case to proceed, and will write their opinions then. No need to show your hand at this stage.