Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

funny funnyy wrote:

literally nobody cares.

some monkey with makeup complains "muh drumpf not good speaka" and frothing libs everywhere jump aboard hate train. meanwhile wall prototypes up, economy looking up and up, lib cesspool of hollywood crumbling, sjw grip on sports crumbling, tax reform moving along, healthcare prospects improving, dem leaders pelosi and waters literally losing minds, and trump-like populist figures rising all across the world. Lol and all moron libs can talk about is same ol' failed script "trump big meanie wahhh wahh" lol looks like the 2020 cuck blowout is gonna be bigger than even I ever thought. seriously, do any of the vapid libs on this board think there is ANY chance of winning in 2020?? lol lemme guess, you thought HIllary was gonna win "big" lolol

"some monkey with makeup" ???

Ummm . . . racist much?

Though it will undoubtedly cause you emotional angst, that I have no interest in seeing you suffer through, my guess is that the non-bigots outnumber the bigots - if only by a slim margin. So things will work out in the end.

L L wrote:

At this point it's not about whether the widow was thrilled with his call but the fact that Trump is basically attacking this widow right now and calling her a liar.

Really low class.

The clown had to get Kelly to back his lies.

I wonder what how Kelly felt about publicly lying for the President.

We know the other clowns are perfectly happy to lie. One more liar;

funny funnyy wrote:

literally nobody cares.

some monkey with makeup complains "muh drumpf not good speaka" and frothing libs everywhere jump aboard hate train. meanwhile wall prototypes up, economy looking up and up, lib cesspool of hollywood crumbling, sjw grip on sports crumbling, tax reform moving along, healthcare prospects improving, dem leaders pelosi and waters literally losing minds, and trump-like populist figures rising all across the world. Lol and all moron libs can talk about is same ol' failed script "trump big meanie wahhh wahh" lol looks like the 2020 cuck blowout is gonna be bigger than even I ever thought. seriously, do any of the vapid libs on this board think there is ANY chance of winning in 2020?? lol lemme guess, you thought HIllary was gonna win "big" lolol

not to mention all the pedophile busts that the mainstream media fails to report. #winning

L L wrote:

Trump has gone after a Muslim family of a dead soldier (Capt. Humayun Khan) and now a black family of a dead soldier.

But feels that the NFL athletes are disrespecting the military.

Boy you are either incredibly disingenuous, or a complete dolt. Trump didn’t “attack” either of them (you’re falling for the MSM BS narrative). In both cases, he was the one that was initially “attacked”, and was just responding to rather strong accusations from the Identity Politics Party.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

L L wrote:

At this point it's not about whether the widow was thrilled with his call but the fact that Trump is basically attacking this widow right now and calling her a liar.

Really low class.

The clown had to get Kelly to back his lies.

I wonder what how Kelly felt about publicly lying for the President.

We know the other clowns are perfectly happy to lie. One more liar;

AND KELLY’S RACIST!! RACIST, RACIST, RACIST!! MUST BE RACIST TO ARGUE WITH A MINORITY!!!! RACIST!!

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Trump spars with widow of slain soldier about condolence call

Amazing. Not only did he successfully dig himself a 10m deep hole violating the most sacred political symbol there is, he keeps shoveling.

Tired of winning, yet?

Uhh, DB, don’t you get it yet? No one’s buying the headlines / fake narratives anymore? Do you really not get it?! What is wrong with you?

Posting a MSM narrative that no one believes, and then implying Trump is losing is ridiculously stupid. Half the country believes the MSM makes up stories about Trump. So posting headlines might not be the best way to argue on message boards anymore, you know?

The Environmental Protection Agency has canceled speaking appearances by three of its scientists set to speak at a Rhode Island conference Monday.

The New York Times first reported that the agency scientists, who were expected to address climate change during their talks to present a 500-page report, were removed from the program at the request of the EPA on Friday. An EPA official told Tom Borden, the program director for the conference, that the scientists would not be allowed to speak, according to the Times.

The EPA clarified in a statement that scientists would be present but not speak.

"EPA supports the Narragansett Bay Estuary, and just this month provided the program a $600,000 grant. EPA scientists are attending, they simply are not presenting; it is not an EPA conference," an EPA spokesperson told CNN.

The EPA did not respond when asked by CNN for the reasoning behind not allowing the scientists to speak.

Flagpole wrote:

What should happen in the future:

1) Trump should not call families of fallen soldiers. Doesn't matter if a few of them said he did fine. This is not something at which he is skilled.

Nah. Everyone but the Mrs. Johnson has been fine with Trump's calls, and she was just backing up her crazy Congresswoman BFF.

A POTUS should be calling families of fallen soldiers if for no other reason that it reminds the POTUS that these are real people whom he - and when Nikki Haley is POTUS, she, - should not put into harm's way without good cause.

That is all.

You are a little bit confused and I don't know if responding to you is a good idea. The widow said that Trump said that "he knew what he was getting into." Most likely coached by the congresswoman. This is what Trump said: I had a very respectful conversation with the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson, and spoke his name from beginning, without hesitation! There were 3 other soldiers killed. I don't hear anyone else complaining. I'm still waiting for proof he lied.

Flagpole wrote:

[quote]its_baddude wrote:

Can you show me proof that Trump lied?

[quote]

Trump said that he didn't tell the wife of that soldier that "he knew what he was getting into", but then Kelly explained how he counseled Trump to say exactly that...it's just that Kelly gave it more of a frame of reference that made it sound reasonable. Trump has no ability to do that.

So, Trump said he didn't say that, but Kelly says he told Trump that that was a good thing to say. Wilson then reported that he did say it. So, he for sure said it, and he then lied about it. This should not be a surprise to you. Trump lies about everything.

You are confused. Trump made a private call and the congresswomen accused him of wrong doing. Trump just does not take sh*t from the media. You should know this by now.

L L wrote:

At this point it's not about whether the widow was thrilled with his call but the fact that Trump is basically attacking this widow right now and calling her a liar.

Really low class.

Bruhs,

Trump's latest job approval rating improving among the only group of voters that matter at this point (aka GOP voters). See here.....

http://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

Trump back into the 80% plus approve range with GOP voters bruhs.

Now Trump has said "I made a very respectful call to that black b!tch."

its_baddude wrote:

You are a little bit confused and I don't know if responding to you is a good idea.

The widow said that Trump said that "he knew what he was getting into." Most likely coached by the congresswoman.

This is what Trump said:

I had a very respectful conversation with the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson, and spoke his name from beginning, without hesitation!

There were 3 other soldiers killed. I don't hear anyone else complaining.

I'm still waiting for proof he lied.

Dude, I am not confused at all. Read this again and try to understand.

1) Trump told the widow that her husband "knew what he was signed up for".

2) Trump then later said he did NOT say that after the congresswoman complained.

3) Kelly then had a press conference and told them that he told Trump to say exactly that. It's just that Kelly gave it a framework that made it acceptable the way he counseled Trump to say it. So, Kelly confirmed that he told Trump to say that...so Trump lied. It is obvious that Trump said it, because the family and the Congresswoman heard it. They couldn't have just made it up, because it is almost verbatim what Kelly said he told Trump to say. So, 100% without question, Trump lied about this.

Good grief brother, don't defend a serial liar.

Man Overboard wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

What should happen in the future:

1) Trump should not call families of fallen soldiers. Doesn't matter if a few of them said he did fine. This is not something at which he is skilled.

Nah. Everyone but the Mrs. Johnson has been fine with Trump's calls, and she was just backing up her crazy Congresswoman BFF.

A POTUS should be calling families of fallen soldiers if for no other reason that it reminds the POTUS that these are real people whom he - and when Nikki Haley is POTUS, she, - should not put into harm's way without good cause.

That is all.

Most Presidents should call families of fallen soldiers. Trump should not. He lacks the empathy and tact to do it correctly.

Only GOP voters matter, bruhs wrote:

Bruhs,

Trump's latest job approval rating improving among the only group of voters that matter at this point (aka GOP voters). See here.....

http://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

Trump back into the 80% plus approve range with GOP voters bruhs.

you are way oversimplifying.

Trump is losing support among the fanatics - his support is slipping from 'strongly support' to 'somewhat support'

that will lead to a serious enthusiasm gap.

And the dems are fired up, winning statehouse elections and record numbers of new candidates are turning out to run.

eric a blair wrote:

Only GOP voters matter, bruhs wrote:

Bruhs,

Trump's latest job approval rating improving among the only group of voters that matter at this point (aka GOP voters). See here.....

http://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

Trump back into the 80% plus approve range with GOP voters bruhs.

you are way oversimplifying.

Trump is losing support among the fanatics - his support is slipping from 'strongly support' to 'somewhat support'

that will lead to a serious enthusiasm gap.

And the dems are fired up, winning statehouse elections and record numbers of new candidates are turning out to run.

Keep dreaming, agip.

The RNC has more than DOUBLE the cash that the DNC has and the DNC has a whopping $3.8 Million in debt. How broke is the DNC? So broke they are worrying they can't even build infrastructure to run winning campaigns.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

you are way oversimplifying.

Trump is losing support among the fanatics - his support is slipping from 'strongly support' to 'somewhat support'

that will lead to a serious enthusiasm gap.

And the dems are fired up, winning statehouse elections and record numbers of new candidates are turning out to run.

Keep dreaming, agip.

The RNC has more than DOUBLE the cash that the DNC has and the DNC has a whopping $3.8 Million in debt. How broke is the DNC? So broke they are worrying they can't even build infrastructure to run winning campaigns.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/22/dnc-2018-rebuilding-finances-244019

the Dem money is going straight to the candidates, in giant floods. Far, far more than Repubs.

I'm not sure of the consequences of money going to candidates rather than the DNC. Might be good, might be bad. But shows the enthusiasm out there to defeat trumpism.

"Animated by opposition to President Donald Trump and the Republican congressional majorities, at least 162 Democratic candidates in 82 GOP-held districts have raised over $100,000 so far this year, according to a POLITICO analysis of the latest FEC data. That’s about four times as many candidates as House Democrats had at this point before the 2016 or 2014 elections, and it’s more than twice as many as Republicans had running at this point eight years ago, on the eve of capturing the House in the 2010 wave election.

Nearly three dozen Republican incumbents were outraised by Democratic challengers in the third quarter of this year – a stunning figure. Nine GOP incumbents already trail a Democratic opponent in cash on hand, increasing the likelihood that many veteran incumbents will face tough opposition for the first time in years."

Something went terribly wrong and four brave Americans are dead. Apparently the one may have been left behind, possibly captured and tortured then killed. Then there is the issue of the USA outsourcing air cover and evacuation to the French and possibly private contractors. Shouldn't be putting troops in the field without proper support.

I expect at least 12 investigations into this, as per Benghazi. I assume Trey Gowdy is up to the task.

Bro, politico as a source....really? That's no different than that turd burglar Disco Gary siting Brietbart (LOL!) as a credible news source. Those are clown sites, bro.