This just in: Republicans state they Kavanaugh lying to them about attempting to rape a young women is okay because he was drunk at the time, and he was only trying to protect his family. Trump adds: Boys will be boys.
This just in: Republicans state they Kavanaugh lying to them about attempting to rape a young women is okay because he was drunk at the time, and he was only trying to protect his family. Trump adds: Boys will be boys.
Flagpole wrote:
Game, Match, Set! wrote:
I read it too.
Yup. Democrats shoot airballs. They strike out on three pitches. They bowl scores of 0. Their IQs are no better than 25.
Sorry, I fixed my own mistake. It's good now;)
This was from when he was in high school right? I really dont see how this matters.
Convince me otherwise.
Alan
Lied to Congress wrote:
This just in: Democrats state other Democrats lying to them about attempting to rape a young women is okay because he was drunk at the time, and he was only trying to protect his family. Hillary adds: Boys will be boys.
She's nuts! And a crook who stole millions!
ktyd wrote:
This just in: Sixty-five women have signed a letter stating that OJ Simpson did not kill them.
Therefore he clearly did not kill Nicole Simpson, either.
Well, I guess we could say the same thing about Hillary and Benghazi, but let's not go there as I voted for her and feel foolish to this day. My logic was flawed and biased, I admit it.
Game, Match, Set! wrote:
I read it too.
Here's his words.
Renato Canova to pop_pop!_v2.2.1
"Pop pop, you are an idiot and a liar...But, when you put in my mouth something I never said, the only reality is that you are not honest and a liar. And, for those reasons, I consider you an idiot."
Renato gave it to him good, he is an idiot and a liar! POD!
ktyd wrote:
ktyd wrote:
This just in: Sixty-five women have signed a letter stating that OJ Simpson did not kill them.
Therefore he clearly did not kill Nicole Simpson, either.
Well, I guess we could say the same thing about Hillary and Benghazi, but let's not go there as I voted for her and feel foolish to this day. My logic was flawed and biased, I admit it.
kudos for admitting it. rarely does anyone on the left admit wrong doing or wrong thinking.
Runningart2004 wrote:
This was from when he was in high school right? I really dont see how this matters.
Convince me otherwise.
Alan
He lied about the incident. He should have been truthful and said he was young and made a mistake. Several mistakes actually: attempted rape and underage drunkenness. Instead he chose to lie that it ever happened—lied about just last week. Based in lying about it makes him unqualified for a SCOTUS seat. There are other SCOTUS candidates who not have a need to lie about such a situation because they have never put themselves into such a situation.
Liared wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
This was from when he was in high school right? I really dont see how this matters.
Convince me otherwise.
Alan
He lied about the incident. He should have been truthful and said he was young and made a mistake. Several mistakes actually: attempted rape and underage drunkenness. Instead he chose to lie that it ever happened—lied about just last week. Based in lying about it makes him unqualified for a SCOTUS seat. There are other SCOTUS candidates who not have a need to lie about such a situation because they have never put themselves into such a situation.
You know what, I'm not perfect either and should be judging him. I wasn't there and it was a long time ago. Hillary lied over and over and I'm the fool who voted for her. Heck, she lied repeatedly in the hearing and was caught, so I'm clearly being biased. Sorry Alan.
Runningart2004 wrote:
This was from when he was in high school right? I really dont see how this matters.
Convince me otherwise.
Alan
Well, we should at least know the truth about something like that. It needs to at a minimum be part of the decision making. We don't just give blanket do-overs what someone did in high school. A sexual assault on a high school girl even though he was in high school at the time is a big deal. We should not accept that kind of thing.
Sorry, "shouldn't" be judging him. I'm simply a common man and should remain as such. Again, sorry Alan.
Democrats lose again
Flagpole wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
This was from when he was in high school right? I really dont see how this matters.
Convince me otherwise.
Alan
Well, we should at least know the truth about something like that. It needs to at a minimum be part of the decision making. We don't just give blanket do-overs what someone did in high school. A sexual assault on a high school girl even though he was in high school at the time is a big deal. We should not accept that kind of thing.
And then the idiot enters the conversation. Alan and I don't need your input Flagpole. Please butt out and stop being such a blow hard.
Liared wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Well, we should at least know the truth about something like that. It needs to at a minimum be part of the decision making. We don't just give blanket do-overs what someone did in high school. A sexual assault on a high school girl even though he was in high school at the time is a big deal. We should not accept that kind of thing.
And then the idiot enters the conversation. Alan and I don't need your input Flagpole. Please butt out and stop being such a blow hard.
Agreed. Ban the Biased Liberal from Ohio!
Liared wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Well, we should at least know the truth about something like that. It needs to at a minimum be part of the decision making. We don't just give blanket do-overs what someone did in high school. A sexual assault on a high school girl even though he was in high school at the time is a big deal. We should not accept that kind of thing.
And then the idiot enters the conversation. Alan and I don't need your input Flagpole. Please butt out and stop being such a blow hard.
1) You clearly do need my input.
2) "Blowhard" is one word.
Flagpole wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
This was from when he was in high school right? I really dont see how this matters.
Convince me otherwise.
Alan
Well, we should at least know the truth about something like that. It needs to at a minimum be part of the decision making. We don't just give blanket do-overs what someone did in high school. A sexual assault on a high school girl even though he was in high school at the time is a big deal. We should not accept that kind of thing.
The accuser's credentials are impeccable. She passed a lie detector test. She discussed the issue with a therapist 6 years ago, a full 25 years afterwards because it is still an issue for her.
Kavanaugh should take a lie detector test himself. He needs to defend his claim that the situation never happened. Or he needs to accept his error and provide an acceptable explanation--why he did it (drunk?) and why he chose not to tell the truth about it just last week (?--I don't see a way out for him on admitting he lied). His only way out is to stick with the full denial at this point.
Liared [name thief] wrote:
Again, sorry Name Thief.
^ The lowly name thief. He has no response to justify why he supports an attempted rapist, and a teenage drunkard, and a liar.
Lie Detector wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Well, we should at least know the truth about something like that. It needs to at a minimum be part of the decision making. We don't just give blanket do-overs what someone did in high school. A sexual assault on a high school girl even though he was in high school at the time is a big deal. We should not accept that kind of thing.
The accuser's credentials are impeccable. She passed a lie detector test. She discussed the issue with a therapist 6 years ago, a full 25 years afterwards because it is still an issue for her.
Kavanaugh should take a lie detector test himself. He needs to defend his claim that the situation never happened. Or he needs to accept his error and provide an acceptable explanation--why he did it (drunk?) and why he chose not to tell the truth about it just last week (?--I don't see a way out for him on admitting he lied). His only way out is to stick with the full denial at this point.
CORRECT!
Flagpole wrote:
Liared [Name Thief] wrote:
blow hard.
2) "Blowhard" is one word.
In the name thief's world Blow Hard is a command from his master.
Lie Detector wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Well, we should at least know the truth about something like that. It needs to at a minimum be part of the decision making. We don't just give blanket do-overs what someone did in high school. A sexual assault on a high school girl even though he was in high school at the time is a big deal. We should not accept that kind of thing.
The accuser's credentials are impeccable. She passed a lie detector test. She discussed the issue with a therapist 6 years ago, a full 25 years afterwards because it is still an issue for her.
Kavanaugh should take a lie detector test himself. He needs to defend his claim that the situation never happened. Or he needs to accept his error and provide an acceptable explanation--why he did it (drunk?) and why he chose not to tell the truth about it just last week (?--I don't see a way out for him on admitting he lied). His only way out is to stick with the full denial at this point.
What is the threshold that separates a "hobbyjogger" from a "sub-elite" runner?
BREAKING: Leonard Korir not going to Paris! 11 Universality athletes get in ahead of him!
Hicham El Guerrouj is back baby! Runs Community Mile in Oxford
Do "running influencers" harm the competitive nature of the sport?
Why's it cost every household $5000 in taxes just to run a public school?